Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility
Recognizing that systems were not achieving adequate reliability during development, leading to reduced warfighting capability and tremendous cost growth, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council acted in August 2006 to require a mandatory sustainment key performance parameter, materiel availability...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Fowler, Randy T Killoy, Sean P |
| description | Recognizing that systems were not achieving adequate reliability during development, leading to reduced warfighting capability and tremendous cost growth, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council acted in August 2006 to require a mandatory sustainment key performance parameter, materiel availability, and two supporting key system attributes, materiel reliability and ownership cost, for all new major defense acquisition programs and other selected programs. This article summarizes the background and rationale for the metrics and discusses some of the additional actions being taken to implement a disciplined approach to reliability and availability.
Published in the International Test and Evaluation (ITEA) Journal, v29 n3 p263-266, September 2008. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA514042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA514042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5140423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHD0yUxLVXCuTM5JVfBNLSnKTC5WSMxLUfAPdlHwL0stKs5MzyixUnDJLE7OLMjJzEtVCM8syVBwy0mtyEzKzMksqeRhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJUA9JfGOLo6mhiYGJkbGBKQBkTItvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Fowler, Randy T ; Killoy, Sean P</creator><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Randy T ; Killoy, Sean P ; ASSISTANT DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR MATERIEL READINESS AND MAINTENANCE POLICY WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>Recognizing that systems were not achieving adequate reliability during development, leading to reduced warfighting capability and tremendous cost growth, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council acted in August 2006 to require a mandatory sustainment key performance parameter, materiel availability, and two supporting key system attributes, materiel reliability and ownership cost, for all new major defense acquisition programs and other selected programs. This article summarizes the background and rationale for the metrics and discusses some of the additional actions being taken to implement a disciplined approach to reliability and availability.
Published in the International Test and Evaluation (ITEA) Journal, v29 n3 p263-266, September 2008.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACQUISITION ; Administration and Management ; AVAILABILITY ; CAIG(COST ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENT GROUP) ; CDD(CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS) ; CHCSM(CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MEMORANDUM) ; CJCSM 3170.01C ; COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS ; COMBAT READINESS ; COST EFFECTIVENESS ; COSTS ; DEFENSE SYSTEMS ; Economics and Cost Analysis ; GROWTH(GENERAL) ; JROC(JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL) ; KPP(KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS) ; KSA(KEY SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES) ; LIFE CYCLES ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MATERIEL ; PARAMETERS ; REDUCTION ; RELIABILITY ; REPRINTS ; REQUIREMENTS ; Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods</subject><creationdate>2008</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA514042$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Randy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killoy, Sean P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASSISTANT DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR MATERIEL READINESS AND MAINTENANCE POLICY WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility</title><description>Recognizing that systems were not achieving adequate reliability during development, leading to reduced warfighting capability and tremendous cost growth, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council acted in August 2006 to require a mandatory sustainment key performance parameter, materiel availability, and two supporting key system attributes, materiel reliability and ownership cost, for all new major defense acquisition programs and other selected programs. This article summarizes the background and rationale for the metrics and discusses some of the additional actions being taken to implement a disciplined approach to reliability and availability.
Published in the International Test and Evaluation (ITEA) Journal, v29 n3 p263-266, September 2008.</description><subject>ACQUISITION</subject><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>AVAILABILITY</subject><subject>CAIG(COST ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENT GROUP)</subject><subject>CDD(CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS)</subject><subject>CHCSM(CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MEMORANDUM)</subject><subject>CJCSM 3170.01C</subject><subject>COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS</subject><subject>COMBAT READINESS</subject><subject>COST EFFECTIVENESS</subject><subject>COSTS</subject><subject>DEFENSE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Economics and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>GROWTH(GENERAL)</subject><subject>JROC(JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL)</subject><subject>KPP(KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS)</subject><subject>KSA(KEY SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES)</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLES</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MATERIEL</subject><subject>PARAMETERS</subject><subject>REDUCTION</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>REPRINTS</subject><subject>REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHD0yUxLVXCuTM5JVfBNLSnKTC5WSMxLUfAPdlHwL0stKs5MzyixUnDJLE7OLMjJzEtVCM8syVBwy0mtyEzKzMksqeRhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJUA9JfGOLo6mhiYGJkbGBKQBkTItvg</recordid><startdate>200809</startdate><enddate>200809</enddate><creator>Fowler, Randy T</creator><creator>Killoy, Sean P</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200809</creationdate><title>Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility</title><author>Fowler, Randy T ; Killoy, Sean P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5140423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ACQUISITION</topic><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>AVAILABILITY</topic><topic>CAIG(COST ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENT GROUP)</topic><topic>CDD(CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS)</topic><topic>CHCSM(CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MEMORANDUM)</topic><topic>CJCSM 3170.01C</topic><topic>COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS</topic><topic>COMBAT READINESS</topic><topic>COST EFFECTIVENESS</topic><topic>COSTS</topic><topic>DEFENSE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Economics and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>GROWTH(GENERAL)</topic><topic>JROC(JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL)</topic><topic>KPP(KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS)</topic><topic>KSA(KEY SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES)</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLES</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MATERIEL</topic><topic>PARAMETERS</topic><topic>REDUCTION</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>REPRINTS</topic><topic>REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Randy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killoy, Sean P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASSISTANT DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR MATERIEL READINESS AND MAINTENANCE POLICY WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fowler, Randy T</au><au>Killoy, Sean P</au><aucorp>ASSISTANT DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR MATERIEL READINESS AND MAINTENANCE POLICY WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility</btitle><date>2008-09</date><risdate>2008</risdate><abstract>Recognizing that systems were not achieving adequate reliability during development, leading to reduced warfighting capability and tremendous cost growth, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council acted in August 2006 to require a mandatory sustainment key performance parameter, materiel availability, and two supporting key system attributes, materiel reliability and ownership cost, for all new major defense acquisition programs and other selected programs. This article summarizes the background and rationale for the metrics and discusses some of the additional actions being taken to implement a disciplined approach to reliability and availability.
Published in the International Test and Evaluation (ITEA) Journal, v29 n3 p263-266, September 2008.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA514042 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | ACQUISITION Administration and Management AVAILABILITY CAIG(COST ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENT GROUP) CDD(CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS) CHCSM(CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MEMORANDUM) CJCSM 3170.01C COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS COMBAT READINESS COST EFFECTIVENESS COSTS DEFENSE SYSTEMS Economics and Cost Analysis GROWTH(GENERAL) JROC(JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL) KPP(KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS) KSA(KEY SYSTEM ATTRIBUTES) LIFE CYCLES Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies MATERIEL PARAMETERS REDUCTION RELIABILITY REPRINTS REQUIREMENTS Test Facilities, Equipment and Methods |
| title | Life Cycle Metrics and OSD Oversight: Discipline With Flexibility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A39%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Life%20Cycle%20Metrics%20and%20OSD%20Oversight:%20Discipline%20With%20Flexibility&rft.au=Fowler,%20Randy%20T&rft.aucorp=ASSISTANT%20DEPUTY%20UNDER%20SECRETARY%20OF%20DEFENSE%20FOR%20MATERIEL%20READINESS%20AND%20MAINTENANCE%20POLICY%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2008-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA514042%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |