Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models

The FRAGPROP model predicts probabilities of propagation of detonation and burning between ammunition stacks. In order to benchmark predictions from FRAGPROP, propagation tests using 155-mm M107 ammunition were conducted. The predicted frequencies of detonation and burning propagation are somewhat g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hillstrom, Warren W, Starkenberg, John
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Hillstrom, Warren W
Starkenberg, John
description The FRAGPROP model predicts probabilities of propagation of detonation and burning between ammunition stacks. In order to benchmark predictions from FRAGPROP, propagation tests using 155-mm M107 ammunition were conducted. The predicted frequencies of detonation and burning propagation are somewhat greater than those observed in the tests. While the results do not provide sufficient data to validate the FRAGPROP predictions with a high level of confidence, they indicate that they are reasonable representations of the actual responses of these munitions. FRAGGEN is a simple model for estimating the fragment output. In order to benchmark its predictions of fragmentation from a missile warhead, an arena test on a single Hellfire missile was performed. Analysis indicates that the predicted distribution is accurate for the smallest fragments. Measured fragment velocities were much lower than the Gurney predictions employed by FRAGGEN. Because the configuration used in the single Hellfire test does not represent the actual storage arrangement, an arena test on two Hellfire missiles in their containers was conducted. Comparison of the fragment mass distributions produced in the two tests indicates depopulation of the smaller fragment sizes in the second test. This renders the FRAGGEN predictions inaccurate. A final arena test with two 155-mm M864 ICM projectiles containing submunitions, conducted in an attempt to develop fragmentation data for this configuration, was not successful. See also ADM001002. Presented at the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th) held in Orlando, Florida on 18-20 August 1998. Published in the Proceedings of the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th), 1998. The original document contains color images.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA513206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA513206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5132063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLBwSs1LzshNLMpWCEktLilWSMsvUnArSkzPTc0rSSzJzM9TSMxLUQgoyi9ITIfwffNTUnOKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OpobGRgZkxAWkAMHorTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Hillstrom, Warren W ; Starkenberg, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillstrom, Warren W ; Starkenberg, John ; ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD</creatorcontrib><description>The FRAGPROP model predicts probabilities of propagation of detonation and burning between ammunition stacks. In order to benchmark predictions from FRAGPROP, propagation tests using 155-mm M107 ammunition were conducted. The predicted frequencies of detonation and burning propagation are somewhat greater than those observed in the tests. While the results do not provide sufficient data to validate the FRAGPROP predictions with a high level of confidence, they indicate that they are reasonable representations of the actual responses of these munitions. FRAGGEN is a simple model for estimating the fragment output. In order to benchmark its predictions of fragmentation from a missile warhead, an arena test on a single Hellfire missile was performed. Analysis indicates that the predicted distribution is accurate for the smallest fragments. Measured fragment velocities were much lower than the Gurney predictions employed by FRAGGEN. Because the configuration used in the single Hellfire test does not represent the actual storage arrangement, an arena test on two Hellfire missiles in their containers was conducted. Comparison of the fragment mass distributions produced in the two tests indicates depopulation of the smaller fragment sizes in the second test. This renders the FRAGGEN predictions inaccurate. A final arena test with two 155-mm M864 ICM projectiles containing submunitions, conducted in an attempt to develop fragmentation data for this configuration, was not successful. See also ADM001002. Presented at the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th) held in Orlando, Florida on 18-20 August 1998. Published in the Proceedings of the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th), 1998. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AMMUNITION ; Ammunition and Explosives ; AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS ; AMMUNITION STACKS ; COMBUSTION ; Computer Programming and Software ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; CONFIDENCE LEVEL ; CONTAINERS ; DETONATIONS ; DISTRIBUTION ; EXPLOSIONS ; EXPLOSIVES ; FRAGGEN COMPUTER MODEL ; FRAGMENTATION ; FRAGMENTS ; FRAGPROP COMPUTER MODEL ; FREQUENCY ; GUIDED MISSILE WARHEADS ; GUIDED MISSILES ; GURNEY PREDICTIONS ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MASS ; PREDICTIONS ; PROJECTILES ; PROPAGATION ; REPRINTS ; Safety Engineering ; STACKING ; STORAGE ; SUBMUNITIONS ; SYMPOSIA ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; VELOCITY</subject><creationdate>1998</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27565,27566</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA513206$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillstrom, Warren W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkenberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models</title><description>The FRAGPROP model predicts probabilities of propagation of detonation and burning between ammunition stacks. In order to benchmark predictions from FRAGPROP, propagation tests using 155-mm M107 ammunition were conducted. The predicted frequencies of detonation and burning propagation are somewhat greater than those observed in the tests. While the results do not provide sufficient data to validate the FRAGPROP predictions with a high level of confidence, they indicate that they are reasonable representations of the actual responses of these munitions. FRAGGEN is a simple model for estimating the fragment output. In order to benchmark its predictions of fragmentation from a missile warhead, an arena test on a single Hellfire missile was performed. Analysis indicates that the predicted distribution is accurate for the smallest fragments. Measured fragment velocities were much lower than the Gurney predictions employed by FRAGGEN. Because the configuration used in the single Hellfire test does not represent the actual storage arrangement, an arena test on two Hellfire missiles in their containers was conducted. Comparison of the fragment mass distributions produced in the two tests indicates depopulation of the smaller fragment sizes in the second test. This renders the FRAGGEN predictions inaccurate. A final arena test with two 155-mm M864 ICM projectiles containing submunitions, conducted in an attempt to develop fragmentation data for this configuration, was not successful. See also ADM001002. Presented at the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th) held in Orlando, Florida on 18-20 August 1998. Published in the Proceedings of the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th), 1998. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>AMMUNITION</subject><subject>Ammunition and Explosives</subject><subject>AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS</subject><subject>AMMUNITION STACKS</subject><subject>COMBUSTION</subject><subject>Computer Programming and Software</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>CONFIDENCE LEVEL</subject><subject>CONTAINERS</subject><subject>DETONATIONS</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>EXPLOSIONS</subject><subject>EXPLOSIVES</subject><subject>FRAGGEN COMPUTER MODEL</subject><subject>FRAGMENTATION</subject><subject>FRAGMENTS</subject><subject>FRAGPROP COMPUTER MODEL</subject><subject>FREQUENCY</subject><subject>GUIDED MISSILE WARHEADS</subject><subject>GUIDED MISSILES</subject><subject>GURNEY PREDICTIONS</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MASS</subject><subject>PREDICTIONS</subject><subject>PROJECTILES</subject><subject>PROPAGATION</subject><subject>REPRINTS</subject><subject>Safety Engineering</subject><subject>STACKING</subject><subject>STORAGE</subject><subject>SUBMUNITIONS</subject><subject>SYMPOSIA</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>VELOCITY</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLBwSs1LzshNLMpWCEktLilWSMsvUnArSkzPTc0rSSzJzM9TSMxLUQgoyi9ITIfwffNTUnOKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OpobGRgZkxAWkAMHorTA</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Hillstrom, Warren W</creator><creator>Starkenberg, John</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models</title><author>Hillstrom, Warren W ; Starkenberg, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5132063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>AMMUNITION</topic><topic>Ammunition and Explosives</topic><topic>AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS</topic><topic>AMMUNITION STACKS</topic><topic>COMBUSTION</topic><topic>Computer Programming and Software</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>CONFIDENCE LEVEL</topic><topic>CONTAINERS</topic><topic>DETONATIONS</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>EXPLOSIONS</topic><topic>EXPLOSIVES</topic><topic>FRAGGEN COMPUTER MODEL</topic><topic>FRAGMENTATION</topic><topic>FRAGMENTS</topic><topic>FRAGPROP COMPUTER MODEL</topic><topic>FREQUENCY</topic><topic>GUIDED MISSILE WARHEADS</topic><topic>GUIDED MISSILES</topic><topic>GURNEY PREDICTIONS</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MASS</topic><topic>PREDICTIONS</topic><topic>PROJECTILES</topic><topic>PROPAGATION</topic><topic>REPRINTS</topic><topic>Safety Engineering</topic><topic>STACKING</topic><topic>STORAGE</topic><topic>SUBMUNITIONS</topic><topic>SYMPOSIA</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>VELOCITY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillstrom, Warren W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starkenberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillstrom, Warren W</au><au>Starkenberg, John</au><aucorp>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models</btitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><abstract>The FRAGPROP model predicts probabilities of propagation of detonation and burning between ammunition stacks. In order to benchmark predictions from FRAGPROP, propagation tests using 155-mm M107 ammunition were conducted. The predicted frequencies of detonation and burning propagation are somewhat greater than those observed in the tests. While the results do not provide sufficient data to validate the FRAGPROP predictions with a high level of confidence, they indicate that they are reasonable representations of the actual responses of these munitions. FRAGGEN is a simple model for estimating the fragment output. In order to benchmark its predictions of fragmentation from a missile warhead, an arena test on a single Hellfire missile was performed. Analysis indicates that the predicted distribution is accurate for the smallest fragments. Measured fragment velocities were much lower than the Gurney predictions employed by FRAGGEN. Because the configuration used in the single Hellfire test does not represent the actual storage arrangement, an arena test on two Hellfire missiles in their containers was conducted. Comparison of the fragment mass distributions produced in the two tests indicates depopulation of the smaller fragment sizes in the second test. This renders the FRAGGEN predictions inaccurate. A final arena test with two 155-mm M864 ICM projectiles containing submunitions, conducted in an attempt to develop fragmentation data for this configuration, was not successful. See also ADM001002. Presented at the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th) held in Orlando, Florida on 18-20 August 1998. Published in the Proceedings of the Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Seminar (28th), 1998. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA513206
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AMMUNITION
Ammunition and Explosives
AMMUNITION FRAGMENTS
AMMUNITION STACKS
COMBUSTION
Computer Programming and Software
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
CONFIDENCE LEVEL
CONTAINERS
DETONATIONS
DISTRIBUTION
EXPLOSIONS
EXPLOSIVES
FRAGGEN COMPUTER MODEL
FRAGMENTATION
FRAGMENTS
FRAGPROP COMPUTER MODEL
FREQUENCY
GUIDED MISSILE WARHEADS
GUIDED MISSILES
GURNEY PREDICTIONS
Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies
MASS
PREDICTIONS
PROJECTILES
PROPAGATION
REPRINTS
Safety Engineering
STACKING
STORAGE
SUBMUNITIONS
SYMPOSIA
TEST AND EVALUATION
VELOCITY
title Benchmark Tests for Fragmentation and Propagation Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A19%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Benchmark%20Tests%20for%20Fragmentation%20and%20Propagation%20Models&rft.au=Hillstrom,%20Warren%20W&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20ABERDEEN%20PROVING%20GROUND%20MD&rft.date=1998-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA513206%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true