Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations

The purpose of this investigation was to quantify active range of motion (AROM) of individuals performing head, upper body, and leg movements with and without personal protective equipment with a focus on Levels B and A protection categories. Fifteen volunteers aged 33 +/- 6 yr (mean +/- SD) complet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Caretti, David M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Caretti, David M
description The purpose of this investigation was to quantify active range of motion (AROM) of individuals performing head, upper body, and leg movements with and without personal protective equipment with a focus on Levels B and A protection categories. Fifteen volunteers aged 33 +/- 6 yr (mean +/- SD) completed head, upper body, and lower body exercises to assess AROM under the following conditions of individual protective equipment (IPE) wear: no IPE, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and Levels B and A protective items. Head AROM was not substantially affected while wearing the SCBA, but AROM performance was reduced for both Levels B and A protection conditions. Upper body movement restrictions due to SCBA and Levels B and A conditions were evident for most AROM activities but were greatest during thoracic flexion and rotation. Comparisons in AROM results among IPE conditions suggest that the SCBA system was the overriding influence in restricting thoracic movements. Even though substantial decrements in performance were found for specific head and upper body AROM variables, few IPE-imposed restrictions on lower body movements were observed. The original document contains color images. All DTIC reproductions will be in black and white.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA508572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA508572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5085723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjb0KwjAUhbs4iPoGDvcFCqIUxS2tFQUFUXcJzU17ISa1uamzb25Qd6fD4Ts_w-QlKqYe4SxtjeA0HB2Ts_AkbmBvFfWkgjRw6hzjN1o-ArV3tLyGCxqdFs6yJIsK8g4lN2RrEG0rO8nBg7QKDtij8ZB_jIBY0FSHyOOTHycDLY3HyU9HyXRbXotdqpiqm-e4zDexEdlslS3niz_4DRcARbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Caretti, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Caretti, David M ; EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIR</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to quantify active range of motion (AROM) of individuals performing head, upper body, and leg movements with and without personal protective equipment with a focus on Levels B and A protection categories. Fifteen volunteers aged 33 +/- 6 yr (mean +/- SD) completed head, upper body, and lower body exercises to assess AROM under the following conditions of individual protective equipment (IPE) wear: no IPE, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and Levels B and A protective items. Head AROM was not substantially affected while wearing the SCBA, but AROM performance was reduced for both Levels B and A protection conditions. Upper body movement restrictions due to SCBA and Levels B and A conditions were evident for most AROM activities but were greatest during thoracic flexion and rotation. Comparisons in AROM results among IPE conditions suggest that the SCBA system was the overriding influence in restricting thoracic movements. Even though substantial decrements in performance were found for specific head and upper body AROM variables, few IPE-imposed restrictions on lower body movements were observed. The original document contains color images. All DTIC reproductions will be in black and white.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AROM(ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION) ; BIOLOGICAL AGENTS ; BREATHING APPARATUS ; CHEMICAL AGENTS ; EXPOSURE SUITS ; HUMAN BODY ; IPE(INDIVIDUAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT) ; LEVEL A PROTECTION ; LEVEL B PROTECTION ; Life Support Systems ; MOTION ; Protective Equipment ; SELF CONTAINED</subject><creationdate>2009</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27565,27566</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA508572$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caretti, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIR</creatorcontrib><title>Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations</title><description>The purpose of this investigation was to quantify active range of motion (AROM) of individuals performing head, upper body, and leg movements with and without personal protective equipment with a focus on Levels B and A protection categories. Fifteen volunteers aged 33 +/- 6 yr (mean +/- SD) completed head, upper body, and lower body exercises to assess AROM under the following conditions of individual protective equipment (IPE) wear: no IPE, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and Levels B and A protective items. Head AROM was not substantially affected while wearing the SCBA, but AROM performance was reduced for both Levels B and A protection conditions. Upper body movement restrictions due to SCBA and Levels B and A conditions were evident for most AROM activities but were greatest during thoracic flexion and rotation. Comparisons in AROM results among IPE conditions suggest that the SCBA system was the overriding influence in restricting thoracic movements. Even though substantial decrements in performance were found for specific head and upper body AROM variables, few IPE-imposed restrictions on lower body movements were observed. The original document contains color images. All DTIC reproductions will be in black and white.</description><subject>AROM(ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION)</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL AGENTS</subject><subject>BREATHING APPARATUS</subject><subject>CHEMICAL AGENTS</subject><subject>EXPOSURE SUITS</subject><subject>HUMAN BODY</subject><subject>IPE(INDIVIDUAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT)</subject><subject>LEVEL A PROTECTION</subject><subject>LEVEL B PROTECTION</subject><subject>Life Support Systems</subject><subject>MOTION</subject><subject>Protective Equipment</subject><subject>SELF CONTAINED</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjb0KwjAUhbs4iPoGDvcFCqIUxS2tFQUFUXcJzU17ISa1uamzb25Qd6fD4Ts_w-QlKqYe4SxtjeA0HB2Ts_AkbmBvFfWkgjRw6hzjN1o-ArV3tLyGCxqdFs6yJIsK8g4lN2RrEG0rO8nBg7QKDtij8ZB_jIBY0FSHyOOTHycDLY3HyU9HyXRbXotdqpiqm-e4zDexEdlslS3niz_4DRcARbo</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Caretti, David M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations</title><author>Caretti, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5085723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>AROM(ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION)</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL AGENTS</topic><topic>BREATHING APPARATUS</topic><topic>CHEMICAL AGENTS</topic><topic>EXPOSURE SUITS</topic><topic>HUMAN BODY</topic><topic>IPE(INDIVIDUAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT)</topic><topic>LEVEL A PROTECTION</topic><topic>LEVEL B PROTECTION</topic><topic>Life Support Systems</topic><topic>MOTION</topic><topic>Protective Equipment</topic><topic>SELF CONTAINED</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caretti, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIR</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caretti, David M</au><aucorp>EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIR</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations</btitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to quantify active range of motion (AROM) of individuals performing head, upper body, and leg movements with and without personal protective equipment with a focus on Levels B and A protection categories. Fifteen volunteers aged 33 +/- 6 yr (mean +/- SD) completed head, upper body, and lower body exercises to assess AROM under the following conditions of individual protective equipment (IPE) wear: no IPE, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and Levels B and A protective items. Head AROM was not substantially affected while wearing the SCBA, but AROM performance was reduced for both Levels B and A protection conditions. Upper body movement restrictions due to SCBA and Levels B and A conditions were evident for most AROM activities but were greatest during thoracic flexion and rotation. Comparisons in AROM results among IPE conditions suggest that the SCBA system was the overriding influence in restricting thoracic movements. Even though substantial decrements in performance were found for specific head and upper body AROM variables, few IPE-imposed restrictions on lower body movements were observed. The original document contains color images. All DTIC reproductions will be in black and white.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA508572
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AROM(ACTIVE RANGE OF MOTION)
BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
BREATHING APPARATUS
CHEMICAL AGENTS
EXPOSURE SUITS
HUMAN BODY
IPE(INDIVIDUAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT)
LEVEL A PROTECTION
LEVEL B PROTECTION
Life Support Systems
MOTION
Protective Equipment
SELF CONTAINED
title Active Range of Motion with Individual Protective Equipment: Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and Levels B and A Configurations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Active%20Range%20of%20Motion%20with%20Individual%20Protective%20Equipment:%20Self-Contained%20Breathing%20Apparatus%20and%20Levels%20B%20and%20A%20Configurations&rft.au=Caretti,%20David%20M&rft.aucorp=EDGEWOOD%20CHEMICAL%20BIOLOGICAL%20CENTER%20ABERDEEN%20PROVING%20GROUND%20MD%20RESEARCH%20AND%20TECHNOLOGY%20DIR&rft.date=2009-10&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA508572%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true