Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations

Technology does not win wars or make nations safe. The search for security is shaped by larger cultural, economic, and political factors and strategic choices. On the other hand, technology has always been the handmaiden of national security. Nations always look for innovations that can offer them c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Carafano, James J, Gudgel, Andew, Kochems, Alane
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Carafano, James J
Gudgel, Andew
Kochems, Alane
description Technology does not win wars or make nations safe. The search for security is shaped by larger cultural, economic, and political factors and strategic choices. On the other hand, technology has always been the handmaiden of national security. Nations always look for innovations that can offer them competitive advantages over their adversaries. Innovation will always be a national security wild card. New technologies may unleash or accelerate social and cultural changes that affect how nations protect themselves on battlefields and behind the scenes. Over the course of the 20th century, America's genius was its capacity to ride above the wave of technological change. That may not be the case in the future. American prowess is at risk. Congress will have to play an active role in ensuring that the United States does not lose its competitive edge. In 2006, The Heritage Foundation organized a series of workshops to examine emerging technologies that have significant implications for national security. These technologies include nanotechnology, biotechnology, advanced computing, directed energy, and robotics. This report reflects the results of these workshops and additional research by Heritage scholars exploring the current and future uses of these innovations, as well as what policy, guidelines, and programs Congress and the Administration should undertake to ensure that the United States remains at the forefront of cutting-edge technological development.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA477700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA477700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4777003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPByzs8tSC3JLMksS1UISU3OyMvPyU_PTC1WSMsvUvBLLMnMz0vMUQhOTS4tyiyptFIISi3LTC1XSMxLATKT83NzU_NSwKqKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OJubm5gYExAWkANzYyiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Carafano, James J ; Gudgel, Andew ; Kochems, Alane</creator><creatorcontrib>Carafano, James J ; Gudgel, Andew ; Kochems, Alane ; HERITAGE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>Technology does not win wars or make nations safe. The search for security is shaped by larger cultural, economic, and political factors and strategic choices. On the other hand, technology has always been the handmaiden of national security. Nations always look for innovations that can offer them competitive advantages over their adversaries. Innovation will always be a national security wild card. New technologies may unleash or accelerate social and cultural changes that affect how nations protect themselves on battlefields and behind the scenes. Over the course of the 20th century, America's genius was its capacity to ride above the wave of technological change. That may not be the case in the future. American prowess is at risk. Congress will have to play an active role in ensuring that the United States does not lose its competitive edge. In 2006, The Heritage Foundation organized a series of workshops to examine emerging technologies that have significant implications for national security. These technologies include nanotechnology, biotechnology, advanced computing, directed energy, and robotics. This report reflects the results of these workshops and additional research by Heritage scholars exploring the current and future uses of these innovations, as well as what policy, guidelines, and programs Congress and the Administration should undertake to ensure that the United States remains at the forefront of cutting-edge technological development.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Administration and Management ; BIOTECHNOLOGY ; Civil Defense ; COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES ; CONGRESS ; COUNTERTERRORISM ; COUNTERTERRORISM EQUIPMENT ; CULTURAL CHANGES ; DIRECTED ENERGY ; DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS ; HOMELAND SECURITY ; MANANGEMENT REFORMS ; Military Intelligence ; NANOTECHNOLOGY ; NATIONAL SECURITY ; NETWORK SCIENCE ; POLICIES ; PRIVATE SECTOR ; PUBLIC HEALTH ; RISK ; ROBOTICS ; SOCIAL CHANGES ; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><creationdate>2008</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,778,883,27550,27551</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA477700$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carafano, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudgel, Andew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochems, Alane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERITAGE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations</title><description>Technology does not win wars or make nations safe. The search for security is shaped by larger cultural, economic, and political factors and strategic choices. On the other hand, technology has always been the handmaiden of national security. Nations always look for innovations that can offer them competitive advantages over their adversaries. Innovation will always be a national security wild card. New technologies may unleash or accelerate social and cultural changes that affect how nations protect themselves on battlefields and behind the scenes. Over the course of the 20th century, America's genius was its capacity to ride above the wave of technological change. That may not be the case in the future. American prowess is at risk. Congress will have to play an active role in ensuring that the United States does not lose its competitive edge. In 2006, The Heritage Foundation organized a series of workshops to examine emerging technologies that have significant implications for national security. These technologies include nanotechnology, biotechnology, advanced computing, directed energy, and robotics. This report reflects the results of these workshops and additional research by Heritage scholars exploring the current and future uses of these innovations, as well as what policy, guidelines, and programs Congress and the Administration should undertake to ensure that the United States remains at the forefront of cutting-edge technological development.</description><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>BIOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Civil Defense</subject><subject>COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES</subject><subject>CONGRESS</subject><subject>COUNTERTERRORISM</subject><subject>COUNTERTERRORISM EQUIPMENT</subject><subject>CULTURAL CHANGES</subject><subject>DIRECTED ENERGY</subject><subject>DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS</subject><subject>HOMELAND SECURITY</subject><subject>MANANGEMENT REFORMS</subject><subject>Military Intelligence</subject><subject>NANOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>NATIONAL SECURITY</subject><subject>NETWORK SCIENCE</subject><subject>POLICIES</subject><subject>PRIVATE SECTOR</subject><subject>PUBLIC HEALTH</subject><subject>RISK</subject><subject>ROBOTICS</subject><subject>SOCIAL CHANGES</subject><subject>TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPByzs8tSC3JLMksS1UISU3OyMvPyU_PTC1WSMsvUvBLLMnMz0vMUQhOTS4tyiyptFIISi3LTC1XSMxLATKT83NzU_NSwKqKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25KSWZyfHFJZl5qSbyji6OJubm5gYExAWkANzYyiA</recordid><startdate>20080229</startdate><enddate>20080229</enddate><creator>Carafano, James J</creator><creator>Gudgel, Andew</creator><creator>Kochems, Alane</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080229</creationdate><title>Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations</title><author>Carafano, James J ; Gudgel, Andew ; Kochems, Alane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4777003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>BIOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Civil Defense</topic><topic>COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES</topic><topic>CONGRESS</topic><topic>COUNTERTERRORISM</topic><topic>COUNTERTERRORISM EQUIPMENT</topic><topic>CULTURAL CHANGES</topic><topic>DIRECTED ENERGY</topic><topic>DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS</topic><topic>HOMELAND SECURITY</topic><topic>MANANGEMENT REFORMS</topic><topic>Military Intelligence</topic><topic>NANOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>NATIONAL SECURITY</topic><topic>NETWORK SCIENCE</topic><topic>POLICIES</topic><topic>PRIVATE SECTOR</topic><topic>PUBLIC HEALTH</topic><topic>RISK</topic><topic>ROBOTICS</topic><topic>SOCIAL CHANGES</topic><topic>TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carafano, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudgel, Andew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochems, Alane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERITAGE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carafano, James J</au><au>Gudgel, Andew</au><au>Kochems, Alane</au><aucorp>HERITAGE FOUNDATION WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations</btitle><date>2008-02-29</date><risdate>2008</risdate><abstract>Technology does not win wars or make nations safe. The search for security is shaped by larger cultural, economic, and political factors and strategic choices. On the other hand, technology has always been the handmaiden of national security. Nations always look for innovations that can offer them competitive advantages over their adversaries. Innovation will always be a national security wild card. New technologies may unleash or accelerate social and cultural changes that affect how nations protect themselves on battlefields and behind the scenes. Over the course of the 20th century, America's genius was its capacity to ride above the wave of technological change. That may not be the case in the future. American prowess is at risk. Congress will have to play an active role in ensuring that the United States does not lose its competitive edge. In 2006, The Heritage Foundation organized a series of workshops to examine emerging technologies that have significant implications for national security. These technologies include nanotechnology, biotechnology, advanced computing, directed energy, and robotics. This report reflects the results of these workshops and additional research by Heritage scholars exploring the current and future uses of these innovations, as well as what policy, guidelines, and programs Congress and the Administration should undertake to ensure that the United States remains at the forefront of cutting-edge technological development.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA477700
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects Administration and Management
BIOTECHNOLOGY
Civil Defense
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES
CONGRESS
COUNTERTERRORISM
COUNTERTERRORISM EQUIPMENT
CULTURAL CHANGES
DIRECTED ENERGY
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
HOMELAND SECURITY
MANANGEMENT REFORMS
Military Intelligence
NANOTECHNOLOGY
NATIONAL SECURITY
NETWORK SCIENCE
POLICIES
PRIVATE SECTOR
PUBLIC HEALTH
RISK
ROBOTICS
SOCIAL CHANGES
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
title Competitive Technologies for National Security: Review and Recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Competitive%20Technologies%20for%20National%20Security:%20Review%20and%20Recommendations&rft.au=Carafano,%20James%20J&rft.aucorp=HERITAGE%20FOUNDATION%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2008-02-29&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA477700%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true