Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing

This research investigates procurement scoring and the Department of Defense's (DoD) use of alternative financing methods, such as leases and public-private ventures. One of the major impediments to using alternative forms of procurement financing for acquiring defense capabilities is in the bu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Summers, Donald E, San Miguel, Joseph G
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Summers, Donald E
San Miguel, Joseph G
description This research investigates procurement scoring and the Department of Defense's (DoD) use of alternative financing methods, such as leases and public-private ventures. One of the major impediments to using alternative forms of procurement financing for acquiring defense capabilities is in the budgetary treatment, or scoring, of these initiatives by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the congressional Budget Committees. The current scoring policy that has been applied to many initiatives essentially negates the advantages from using alternative forms of financing. Therefore, this research examines existing policies and their adherence to statutes. It also investigates the recording methods of the various government organizations and committees and their documentation of obligations and outlays related to financing alternatives used by federal agencies. Preliminary evidence suggests that this emerging topic has major importance for future DoD acquisitions in a resource-constrained environment. Included are recommendations for changes in budgetary scoring that encompass the full scope of federal obligations and expenditures while promoting efficient, more rapid and fiscally responsible acquisitions. The original document contains color images.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA475519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA475519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4755193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDBzKk1JTy1RCE7OL8rMS7dScMxT8MwtSE3JzE3NK1EoyVdwzClJLcpLLMksS1Vwy8xLzEsGquNhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OJuampoaWxgSkAZPLKis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Summers, Donald E ; San Miguel, Joseph G</creator><creatorcontrib>Summers, Donald E ; San Miguel, Joseph G ; NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC POLICY</creatorcontrib><description>This research investigates procurement scoring and the Department of Defense's (DoD) use of alternative financing methods, such as leases and public-private ventures. One of the major impediments to using alternative forms of procurement financing for acquiring defense capabilities is in the budgetary treatment, or scoring, of these initiatives by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the congressional Budget Committees. The current scoring policy that has been applied to many initiatives essentially negates the advantages from using alternative forms of financing. Therefore, this research examines existing policies and their adherence to statutes. It also investigates the recording methods of the various government organizations and committees and their documentation of obligations and outlays related to financing alternatives used by federal agencies. Preliminary evidence suggests that this emerging topic has major importance for future DoD acquisitions in a resource-constrained environment. Included are recommendations for changes in budgetary scoring that encompass the full scope of federal obligations and expenditures while promoting efficient, more rapid and fiscally responsible acquisitions. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACQUISITION ; CONGRESS ; DEFENSE SYSTEMS ; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ; Economics and Cost Analysis ; FEDERAL BUDGETS ; FINANCE ; ORGANIZATIONS ; POLICIES ; PROCUREMENT ; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><creationdate>2007</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA475519$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Summers, Donald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC POLICY</creatorcontrib><title>Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing</title><description>This research investigates procurement scoring and the Department of Defense's (DoD) use of alternative financing methods, such as leases and public-private ventures. One of the major impediments to using alternative forms of procurement financing for acquiring defense capabilities is in the budgetary treatment, or scoring, of these initiatives by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the congressional Budget Committees. The current scoring policy that has been applied to many initiatives essentially negates the advantages from using alternative forms of financing. Therefore, this research examines existing policies and their adherence to statutes. It also investigates the recording methods of the various government organizations and committees and their documentation of obligations and outlays related to financing alternatives used by federal agencies. Preliminary evidence suggests that this emerging topic has major importance for future DoD acquisitions in a resource-constrained environment. Included are recommendations for changes in budgetary scoring that encompass the full scope of federal obligations and expenditures while promoting efficient, more rapid and fiscally responsible acquisitions. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>ACQUISITION</subject><subject>CONGRESS</subject><subject>DEFENSE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</subject><subject>Economics and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>FEDERAL BUDGETS</subject><subject>FINANCE</subject><subject>ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>POLICIES</subject><subject>PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDBzKk1JTy1RCE7OL8rMS7dScMxT8MwtSE3JzE3NK1EoyVdwzClJLcpLLMksS1Vwy8xLzEsGquNhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OJuampoaWxgSkAZPLKis</recordid><startdate>20070906</startdate><enddate>20070906</enddate><creator>Summers, Donald E</creator><creator>San Miguel, Joseph G</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070906</creationdate><title>Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing</title><author>Summers, Donald E ; San Miguel, Joseph G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4755193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ACQUISITION</topic><topic>CONGRESS</topic><topic>DEFENSE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</topic><topic>Economics and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>FEDERAL BUDGETS</topic><topic>FINANCE</topic><topic>ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>POLICIES</topic><topic>PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Summers, Donald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC POLICY</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Summers, Donald E</au><au>San Miguel, Joseph G</au><aucorp>NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC POLICY</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing</btitle><date>2007-09-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><abstract>This research investigates procurement scoring and the Department of Defense's (DoD) use of alternative financing methods, such as leases and public-private ventures. One of the major impediments to using alternative forms of procurement financing for acquiring defense capabilities is in the budgetary treatment, or scoring, of these initiatives by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the congressional Budget Committees. The current scoring policy that has been applied to many initiatives essentially negates the advantages from using alternative forms of financing. Therefore, this research examines existing policies and their adherence to statutes. It also investigates the recording methods of the various government organizations and committees and their documentation of obligations and outlays related to financing alternatives used by federal agencies. Preliminary evidence suggests that this emerging topic has major importance for future DoD acquisitions in a resource-constrained environment. Included are recommendations for changes in budgetary scoring that encompass the full scope of federal obligations and expenditures while promoting efficient, more rapid and fiscally responsible acquisitions. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA475519
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ACQUISITION
CONGRESS
DEFENSE SYSTEMS
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Economics and Cost Analysis
FEDERAL BUDGETS
FINANCE
ORGANIZATIONS
POLICIES
PROCUREMENT
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
title Budget Scoring: An Impediment to Alternative Financing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Budget%20Scoring:%20An%20Impediment%20to%20Alternative%20Financing&rft.au=Summers,%20Donald%20E&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20POSTGRADUATE%20SCHOOL%20MONTEREY%20CA%20GRADUATE%20SCHOOL%20OF%20BUSINESS%20AND%20PUBLIC%20POLICY&rft.date=2007-09-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA475519%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true