Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance

Computational tools and techniques for modeling team performance have advanced significantly in recent years. However, there have been few efforts to combine complementary modeling approaches. In the Manning Affordability Initiative, we have applied three modeling technologies to experimental data f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Freeman, Jared T, Pharmer, James A, Lorenzen, Christy, Santoro, Thomas P, Kieras, David
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Freeman, Jared T
Pharmer, James A
Lorenzen, Christy
Santoro, Thomas P
Kieras, David
description Computational tools and techniques for modeling team performance have advanced significantly in recent years. However, there have been few efforts to combine complementary modeling approaches. In the Manning Affordability Initiative, we have applied three modeling technologies to experimental data from a single domain (air defense warfare), a single scenario, and common watchstation technologies (current AEGIS technology and an advanced prototype). The conclusion of this multi-year project in early 2002 offers an opportunity to review the findings. The proposed panelists will summarize a human-in-the-loop experiment conducted to provide modeling data and present findings from efforts to integrate three modeling approaches for design and design validation. Team Optimal Design (TOD) focuses on team modeling. The Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) uses a general task modeling technique that applies well to individuals or teams. The GOMS Language Evaluation and Analysis Tool (GLEAN) combines individual models of users interacting as a team. The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with Aptima, Inc, Washington, DC, Micro Analysis and Design, Inc., Boulder, CO and Univ. of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA461076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA461076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4610763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDByzs8tyEnNTc0rSSyqVPBNLcnITylWyE9T8M1PSc3JzEtXCElNzFUISC1Kyy_KTcxLTuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OJmaGBuZmxgSkAQ0vKRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Freeman, Jared T ; Pharmer, James A ; Lorenzen, Christy ; Santoro, Thomas P ; Kieras, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jared T ; Pharmer, James A ; Lorenzen, Christy ; Santoro, Thomas P ; Kieras, David ; NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAINING SYSTEMS DIV ORLANDO FL</creatorcontrib><description>Computational tools and techniques for modeling team performance have advanced significantly in recent years. However, there have been few efforts to combine complementary modeling approaches. In the Manning Affordability Initiative, we have applied three modeling technologies to experimental data from a single domain (air defense warfare), a single scenario, and common watchstation technologies (current AEGIS technology and an advanced prototype). The conclusion of this multi-year project in early 2002 offers an opportunity to review the findings. The proposed panelists will summarize a human-in-the-loop experiment conducted to provide modeling data and present findings from efforts to integrate three modeling approaches for design and design validation. Team Optimal Design (TOD) focuses on team modeling. The Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) uses a general task modeling technique that applies well to individuals or teams. The GOMS Language Evaluation and Analysis Tool (GLEAN) combines individual models of users interacting as a team. The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with Aptima, Inc, Washington, DC, Micro Analysis and Design, Inc., Boulder, CO and Univ. of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AERIAL WARFARE ; AIR DEFENSE ; COMPUTATIONS ; EXPERIMENTAL DATA ; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS ; LANGUAGE ; METHODOLOGY ; Operations Research ; OPTIMIZATION ; PERFORMANCE(HUMAN) ; PROTOTYPES ; SCENARIOS ; TEAMS(PERSONNEL) ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; VALIDATION</subject><creationdate>2002</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA461076$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jared T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pharmer, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieras, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAINING SYSTEMS DIV ORLANDO FL</creatorcontrib><title>Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance</title><description>Computational tools and techniques for modeling team performance have advanced significantly in recent years. However, there have been few efforts to combine complementary modeling approaches. In the Manning Affordability Initiative, we have applied three modeling technologies to experimental data from a single domain (air defense warfare), a single scenario, and common watchstation technologies (current AEGIS technology and an advanced prototype). The conclusion of this multi-year project in early 2002 offers an opportunity to review the findings. The proposed panelists will summarize a human-in-the-loop experiment conducted to provide modeling data and present findings from efforts to integrate three modeling approaches for design and design validation. Team Optimal Design (TOD) focuses on team modeling. The Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) uses a general task modeling technique that applies well to individuals or teams. The GOMS Language Evaluation and Analysis Tool (GLEAN) combines individual models of users interacting as a team. The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with Aptima, Inc, Washington, DC, Micro Analysis and Design, Inc., Boulder, CO and Univ. of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI.</description><subject>AERIAL WARFARE</subject><subject>AIR DEFENSE</subject><subject>COMPUTATIONS</subject><subject>EXPERIMENTAL DATA</subject><subject>INTEGRATED SYSTEMS</subject><subject>LANGUAGE</subject><subject>METHODOLOGY</subject><subject>Operations Research</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</subject><subject>PROTOTYPES</subject><subject>SCENARIOS</subject><subject>TEAMS(PERSONNEL)</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDByzs8tyEnNTc0rSSyqVPBNLcnITylWyE9T8M1PSc3JzEtXCElNzFUISC1Kyy_KTcxLTuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6OJmaGBuZmxgSkAQ0vKRY</recordid><startdate>200201</startdate><enddate>200201</enddate><creator>Freeman, Jared T</creator><creator>Pharmer, James A</creator><creator>Lorenzen, Christy</creator><creator>Santoro, Thomas P</creator><creator>Kieras, David</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200201</creationdate><title>Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance</title><author>Freeman, Jared T ; Pharmer, James A ; Lorenzen, Christy ; Santoro, Thomas P ; Kieras, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4610763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>AERIAL WARFARE</topic><topic>AIR DEFENSE</topic><topic>COMPUTATIONS</topic><topic>EXPERIMENTAL DATA</topic><topic>INTEGRATED SYSTEMS</topic><topic>LANGUAGE</topic><topic>METHODOLOGY</topic><topic>Operations Research</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</topic><topic>PROTOTYPES</topic><topic>SCENARIOS</topic><topic>TEAMS(PERSONNEL)</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jared T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pharmer, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieras, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAINING SYSTEMS DIV ORLANDO FL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freeman, Jared T</au><au>Pharmer, James A</au><au>Lorenzen, Christy</au><au>Santoro, Thomas P</au><au>Kieras, David</au><aucorp>NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAINING SYSTEMS DIV ORLANDO FL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance</btitle><date>2002-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><abstract>Computational tools and techniques for modeling team performance have advanced significantly in recent years. However, there have been few efforts to combine complementary modeling approaches. In the Manning Affordability Initiative, we have applied three modeling technologies to experimental data from a single domain (air defense warfare), a single scenario, and common watchstation technologies (current AEGIS technology and an advanced prototype). The conclusion of this multi-year project in early 2002 offers an opportunity to review the findings. The proposed panelists will summarize a human-in-the-loop experiment conducted to provide modeling data and present findings from efforts to integrate three modeling approaches for design and design validation. Team Optimal Design (TOD) focuses on team modeling. The Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) uses a general task modeling technique that applies well to individuals or teams. The GOMS Language Evaluation and Analysis Tool (GLEAN) combines individual models of users interacting as a team. The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with Aptima, Inc, Washington, DC, Micro Analysis and Design, Inc., Boulder, CO and Univ. of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA461076
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AERIAL WARFARE
AIR DEFENSE
COMPUTATIONS
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
LANGUAGE
METHODOLOGY
Operations Research
OPTIMIZATION
PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)
PROTOTYPES
SCENARIOS
TEAMS(PERSONNEL)
TEST AND EVALUATION
VALIDATION
title Complementary Methods of Modeling Team Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A18%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Complementary%20Methods%20of%20Modeling%20Team%20Performance&rft.au=Freeman,%20Jared%20T&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20AIR%20WARFARE%20CENTER%20TRAINING%20SYSTEMS%20DIV%20ORLANDO%20FL&rft.date=2002-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA461076%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true