Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan

This discussion compares incident and transferred energy for gages located within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Comparisons are made primarily by examining the differences in the incident and transferred significant wave height, (Hm0). Other comparisons use spectral results. Spectral analysi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS
description This discussion compares incident and transferred energy for gages located within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Comparisons are made primarily by examining the differences in the incident and transferred significant wave height, (Hm0). Other comparisons use spectral results. Spectral analysis allows the energy of the total wave record to be broken down into discrete frequency bands. Energy inside and outside the wave absorber may then be compared and a transfer factor for each discrete frequency can be determined. Incident, (lakeside of absorber) and transferred (harborside of absorber) wave data were collected within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Non-directional, internally recording gages, each mounted about 6 inches off the bottom were deployed as indicated in figure 1. The incident gage is MI002 and is identified as Northwest Channel. This gage was deployed in 11 feet of water and was located 121 feet west of west edge of north wave absorber. The harborside gage is MI004 and is designated as Northeast Channel. MI004 was deployed in 8 feet of water, 72 feet east of east edge of north wave absorber. The purpose of this data collection effort was to determine characteristics of the wave absorber located at the western end of the channel. Wave gages were set to collect hourly using subsurface pressure sensors, however, MI004 collected every 26-32 minutes throughout the study. The sample rate for these sensors was 2 Hz and the burst length was 1024 seconds.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA459003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA459003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4590033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDBzLUvMKU0syczPU8hPUyjJSFUITyxLVXBMKs4vSkotUkgsUQhIzSspTyxJLdJR8M1MzshMT8zjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiamlgYGxsYEpAGN0Snv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</creator><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><description>This discussion compares incident and transferred energy for gages located within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Comparisons are made primarily by examining the differences in the incident and transferred significant wave height, (Hm0). Other comparisons use spectral results. Spectral analysis allows the energy of the total wave record to be broken down into discrete frequency bands. Energy inside and outside the wave absorber may then be compared and a transfer factor for each discrete frequency can be determined. Incident, (lakeside of absorber) and transferred (harborside of absorber) wave data were collected within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Non-directional, internally recording gages, each mounted about 6 inches off the bottom were deployed as indicated in figure 1. The incident gage is MI002 and is identified as Northwest Channel. This gage was deployed in 11 feet of water and was located 121 feet west of west edge of north wave absorber. The harborside gage is MI004 and is designated as Northeast Channel. MI004 was deployed in 8 feet of water, 72 feet east of east edge of north wave absorber. The purpose of this data collection effort was to determine characteristics of the wave absorber located at the western end of the channel. Wave gages were set to collect hourly using subsurface pressure sensors, however, MI004 collected every 26-32 minutes throughout the study. The sample rate for these sensors was 2 Hz and the burst length was 1024 seconds.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ABSORBERS(EQUIPMENT) ; CHANNELS(WATERWAYS) ; DATA ACQUISITION ; DETECTORS ; FREQUENCY ; GAGES ; MICHIGAN ; Physical and Dynamic Oceanography ; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS ; WAVES</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This document is not available from DTIC in microfiche.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA459003$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan</title><description>This discussion compares incident and transferred energy for gages located within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Comparisons are made primarily by examining the differences in the incident and transferred significant wave height, (Hm0). Other comparisons use spectral results. Spectral analysis allows the energy of the total wave record to be broken down into discrete frequency bands. Energy inside and outside the wave absorber may then be compared and a transfer factor for each discrete frequency can be determined. Incident, (lakeside of absorber) and transferred (harborside of absorber) wave data were collected within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Non-directional, internally recording gages, each mounted about 6 inches off the bottom were deployed as indicated in figure 1. The incident gage is MI002 and is identified as Northwest Channel. This gage was deployed in 11 feet of water and was located 121 feet west of west edge of north wave absorber. The harborside gage is MI004 and is designated as Northeast Channel. MI004 was deployed in 8 feet of water, 72 feet east of east edge of north wave absorber. The purpose of this data collection effort was to determine characteristics of the wave absorber located at the western end of the channel. Wave gages were set to collect hourly using subsurface pressure sensors, however, MI004 collected every 26-32 minutes throughout the study. The sample rate for these sensors was 2 Hz and the burst length was 1024 seconds.</description><subject>ABSORBERS(EQUIPMENT)</subject><subject>CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)</subject><subject>DATA ACQUISITION</subject><subject>DETECTORS</subject><subject>FREQUENCY</subject><subject>GAGES</subject><subject>MICHIGAN</subject><subject>Physical and Dynamic Oceanography</subject><subject>SPECTRUM ANALYSIS</subject><subject>WAVES</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDBzLUvMKU0syczPU8hPUyjJSFUITyxLVXBMKs4vSkotUkgsUQhIzSspTyxJLdJR8M1MzshMT8zjYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiamlgYGxsYEpAGN0Snv</recordid><startdate>20040120</startdate><enddate>20040120</enddate><creator>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040120</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4590033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>ABSORBERS(EQUIPMENT)</topic><topic>CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)</topic><topic>DATA ACQUISITION</topic><topic>DETECTORS</topic><topic>FREQUENCY</topic><topic>GAGES</topic><topic>MICHIGAN</topic><topic>Physical and Dynamic Oceanography</topic><topic>SPECTRUM ANALYSIS</topic><topic>WAVES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan</btitle><date>2004-01-20</date><risdate>2004</risdate><abstract>This discussion compares incident and transferred energy for gages located within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Comparisons are made primarily by examining the differences in the incident and transferred significant wave height, (Hm0). Other comparisons use spectral results. Spectral analysis allows the energy of the total wave record to be broken down into discrete frequency bands. Energy inside and outside the wave absorber may then be compared and a transfer factor for each discrete frequency can be determined. Incident, (lakeside of absorber) and transferred (harborside of absorber) wave data were collected within the Pentwater, Michigan boat channel. Non-directional, internally recording gages, each mounted about 6 inches off the bottom were deployed as indicated in figure 1. The incident gage is MI002 and is identified as Northwest Channel. This gage was deployed in 11 feet of water and was located 121 feet west of west edge of north wave absorber. The harborside gage is MI004 and is designated as Northeast Channel. MI004 was deployed in 8 feet of water, 72 feet east of east edge of north wave absorber. The purpose of this data collection effort was to determine characteristics of the wave absorber located at the western end of the channel. Wave gages were set to collect hourly using subsurface pressure sensors, however, MI004 collected every 26-32 minutes throughout the study. The sample rate for these sensors was 2 Hz and the burst length was 1024 seconds.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA459003
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ABSORBERS(EQUIPMENT)
CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)
DATA ACQUISITION
DETECTORS
FREQUENCY
GAGES
MICHIGAN
Physical and Dynamic Oceanography
SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
WAVES
title Evaluation of the Wave Absorber at Pentwater, Michigan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A13%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Wave%20Absorber%20at%20Pentwater,%20Michigan&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20ENGINEER%20WATERWAYS%20EXPERIMENT%20STATION%20VICKSBURG%20MS&rft.date=2004-01-20&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA459003%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true