Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax
Prevention of inhalational anthrax after Bacillus anthracis spore exposure requires a prolonged course of antibiotic prophylaxis. In response to the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent inhalational anthrax, but adherence t...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Vietri, Nicholas J Purcell, Bret K Lawler, James V Leffel, Elizabeth K Rico, Pedro Gamble, Christopher S Twenhafel, Nancy A Ivins, Bruce E Wright, Mary E Friedlander, Arthur M |
description | Prevention of inhalational anthrax after Bacillus anthracis spore exposure requires a prolonged course of antibiotic prophylaxis. In response to the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent inhalational anthrax, but adherence to this regimen was poor. We sought to determine whether a short course of antibiotic prophylaxis after exposure could protect non-human primates from a high-dose spore challenge if vaccination was combined with antibiotics. Two groups of 10 rhesus macaques were exposed to 1,600 LD(sub 50) of spores by aerosol. Both groups were given ciprofloxacin by orogastric tube twice daily for 14 days, beginning 1-2 h after exposure. One group also received three doses of the licensed human anthrax vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed) after exposure. In the ciprofloxacin-only group, four of nine monkeys (44%) survived the challenge. In contrast, all 10 monkeys that received 14 days of antibiotic plus anthrax vaccine adsorbed survived (P = 0.011). Thus, postexposure vaccination enhanced the protection afforded by 14 days of antibiotic prophylaxis alone and completely protected animals against inhalational anthrax. These data provide evidence that postexposure vaccination can shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis required to protect against inhalational anthrax and may impact public health management of a bioterrorism event.
Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), v103 n20 p7813-7816, 16 May 2006. Prepared in cooperation with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Prepared in collaboration with Bayer Pharmaceutical Corporation, West Haven, CT. The original document contains color images. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA448475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA448475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4484753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjbEKwkAQRNNYiPoHFvsDqYxoG2JEu4BiGy7n6i1c7sLtBs_Cf_cUe6thmMe8afY6GR8kr_wYGKHxLBgHz2NAKJ1QR15IQxP8YJ5WRWKofN-Rwys8SAxclNbklJB3H0pQC0N5V-RYoI4DBurRibJwdEbZL5hK-jZBxXk2uSnLuPjlLFvu63N1yK_J2rIkj7TlriyKbbFZr_7Mbxu3Rnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Vietri, Nicholas J ; Purcell, Bret K ; Lawler, James V ; Leffel, Elizabeth K ; Rico, Pedro ; Gamble, Christopher S ; Twenhafel, Nancy A ; Ivins, Bruce E ; Wright, Mary E ; Friedlander, Arthur M</creator><creatorcontrib>Vietri, Nicholas J ; Purcell, Bret K ; Lawler, James V ; Leffel, Elizabeth K ; Rico, Pedro ; Gamble, Christopher S ; Twenhafel, Nancy A ; Ivins, Bruce E ; Wright, Mary E ; Friedlander, Arthur M ; ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INST OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK MD</creatorcontrib><description>Prevention of inhalational anthrax after Bacillus anthracis spore exposure requires a prolonged course of antibiotic prophylaxis. In response to the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent inhalational anthrax, but adherence to this regimen was poor. We sought to determine whether a short course of antibiotic prophylaxis after exposure could protect non-human primates from a high-dose spore challenge if vaccination was combined with antibiotics. Two groups of 10 rhesus macaques were exposed to 1,600 LD(sub 50) of spores by aerosol. Both groups were given ciprofloxacin by orogastric tube twice daily for 14 days, beginning 1-2 h after exposure. One group also received three doses of the licensed human anthrax vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed) after exposure. In the ciprofloxacin-only group, four of nine monkeys (44%) survived the challenge. In contrast, all 10 monkeys that received 14 days of antibiotic plus anthrax vaccine adsorbed survived (P = 0.011). Thus, postexposure vaccination enhanced the protection afforded by 14 days of antibiotic prophylaxis alone and completely protected animals against inhalational anthrax. These data provide evidence that postexposure vaccination can shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis required to protect against inhalational anthrax and may impact public health management of a bioterrorism event.
Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), v103 n20 p7813-7816, 16 May 2006. Prepared in cooperation with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Prepared in collaboration with Bayer Pharmaceutical Corporation, West Haven, CT. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ANTHRAX ; ANTIBIOTICS ; BACILLUS ANTHRACIS ; EXPOSURE(PHYSIOLOGY) ; IMMUNIZATION ; INHALATION ; Medicine and Medical Research ; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE ; PROTECTIVE TREATMENTS ; REPRINTS ; VACCINES</subject><creationdate>2006</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA448475$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vietri, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Bret K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leffel, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, Christopher S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twenhafel, Nancy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, Arthur M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INST OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK MD</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax</title><description>Prevention of inhalational anthrax after Bacillus anthracis spore exposure requires a prolonged course of antibiotic prophylaxis. In response to the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent inhalational anthrax, but adherence to this regimen was poor. We sought to determine whether a short course of antibiotic prophylaxis after exposure could protect non-human primates from a high-dose spore challenge if vaccination was combined with antibiotics. Two groups of 10 rhesus macaques were exposed to 1,600 LD(sub 50) of spores by aerosol. Both groups were given ciprofloxacin by orogastric tube twice daily for 14 days, beginning 1-2 h after exposure. One group also received three doses of the licensed human anthrax vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed) after exposure. In the ciprofloxacin-only group, four of nine monkeys (44%) survived the challenge. In contrast, all 10 monkeys that received 14 days of antibiotic plus anthrax vaccine adsorbed survived (P = 0.011). Thus, postexposure vaccination enhanced the protection afforded by 14 days of antibiotic prophylaxis alone and completely protected animals against inhalational anthrax. These data provide evidence that postexposure vaccination can shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis required to protect against inhalational anthrax and may impact public health management of a bioterrorism event.
Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), v103 n20 p7813-7816, 16 May 2006. Prepared in cooperation with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Prepared in collaboration with Bayer Pharmaceutical Corporation, West Haven, CT. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>ANTHRAX</subject><subject>ANTIBIOTICS</subject><subject>BACILLUS ANTHRACIS</subject><subject>EXPOSURE(PHYSIOLOGY)</subject><subject>IMMUNIZATION</subject><subject>INHALATION</subject><subject>Medicine and Medical Research</subject><subject>PREVENTIVE MEDICINE</subject><subject>PROTECTIVE TREATMENTS</subject><subject>REPRINTS</subject><subject>VACCINES</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjbEKwkAQRNNYiPoHFvsDqYxoG2JEu4BiGy7n6i1c7sLtBs_Cf_cUe6thmMe8afY6GR8kr_wYGKHxLBgHz2NAKJ1QR15IQxP8YJ5WRWKofN-Rwys8SAxclNbklJB3H0pQC0N5V-RYoI4DBurRibJwdEbZL5hK-jZBxXk2uSnLuPjlLFvu63N1yK_J2rIkj7TlriyKbbFZr_7Mbxu3Rnc</recordid><startdate>20060516</startdate><enddate>20060516</enddate><creator>Vietri, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Purcell, Bret K</creator><creator>Lawler, James V</creator><creator>Leffel, Elizabeth K</creator><creator>Rico, Pedro</creator><creator>Gamble, Christopher S</creator><creator>Twenhafel, Nancy A</creator><creator>Ivins, Bruce E</creator><creator>Wright, Mary E</creator><creator>Friedlander, Arthur M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060516</creationdate><title>Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax</title><author>Vietri, Nicholas J ; Purcell, Bret K ; Lawler, James V ; Leffel, Elizabeth K ; Rico, Pedro ; Gamble, Christopher S ; Twenhafel, Nancy A ; Ivins, Bruce E ; Wright, Mary E ; Friedlander, Arthur M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4484753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>ANTHRAX</topic><topic>ANTIBIOTICS</topic><topic>BACILLUS ANTHRACIS</topic><topic>EXPOSURE(PHYSIOLOGY)</topic><topic>IMMUNIZATION</topic><topic>INHALATION</topic><topic>Medicine and Medical Research</topic><topic>PREVENTIVE MEDICINE</topic><topic>PROTECTIVE TREATMENTS</topic><topic>REPRINTS</topic><topic>VACCINES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vietri, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purcell, Bret K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, James V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leffel, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamble, Christopher S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twenhafel, Nancy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivins, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlander, Arthur M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INST OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK MD</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vietri, Nicholas J</au><au>Purcell, Bret K</au><au>Lawler, James V</au><au>Leffel, Elizabeth K</au><au>Rico, Pedro</au><au>Gamble, Christopher S</au><au>Twenhafel, Nancy A</au><au>Ivins, Bruce E</au><au>Wright, Mary E</au><au>Friedlander, Arthur M</au><aucorp>ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INST OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK MD</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax</btitle><date>2006-05-16</date><risdate>2006</risdate><abstract>Prevention of inhalational anthrax after Bacillus anthracis spore exposure requires a prolonged course of antibiotic prophylaxis. In response to the 2001 anthrax attack in the United States, 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent inhalational anthrax, but adherence to this regimen was poor. We sought to determine whether a short course of antibiotic prophylaxis after exposure could protect non-human primates from a high-dose spore challenge if vaccination was combined with antibiotics. Two groups of 10 rhesus macaques were exposed to 1,600 LD(sub 50) of spores by aerosol. Both groups were given ciprofloxacin by orogastric tube twice daily for 14 days, beginning 1-2 h after exposure. One group also received three doses of the licensed human anthrax vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed) after exposure. In the ciprofloxacin-only group, four of nine monkeys (44%) survived the challenge. In contrast, all 10 monkeys that received 14 days of antibiotic plus anthrax vaccine adsorbed survived (P = 0.011). Thus, postexposure vaccination enhanced the protection afforded by 14 days of antibiotic prophylaxis alone and completely protected animals against inhalational anthrax. These data provide evidence that postexposure vaccination can shorten the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis required to protect against inhalational anthrax and may impact public health management of a bioterrorism event.
Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), v103 n20 p7813-7816, 16 May 2006. Prepared in cooperation with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Prepared in collaboration with Bayer Pharmaceutical Corporation, West Haven, CT. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA448475 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | ANTHRAX ANTIBIOTICS BACILLUS ANTHRACIS EXPOSURE(PHYSIOLOGY) IMMUNIZATION INHALATION Medicine and Medical Research PREVENTIVE MEDICINE PROTECTIVE TREATMENTS REPRINTS VACCINES |
title | Short-Course Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis Combined with Vaccination Protects Against Experimental Inhalational Anthrax |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Short-Course%20Postexposure%20Antibiotic%20Prophylaxis%20Combined%20with%20Vaccination%20Protects%20Against%20Experimental%20Inhalational%20Anthrax&rft.au=Vietri,%20Nicholas%20J&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20MEDICAL%20RESEARCH%20INST%20OF%20INFECTIOUS%20DISEASES%20FORT%20DETRICK%20MD&rft.date=2006-05-16&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA448475%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |