MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest

This paper presents Etest determinations of MICs of selected antimicrobial agents for 76 isolates of Bacillus anthracis chosen for their diverse histories and 67, 12, and 4 cultures, respectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range of clinical an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Turnbull, Peter C, Sirianni, Nicky M, LeBron, Carlos I, Samaan, Marian N, Sutton, Felicia N, Reyes, Anatalio E, Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Turnbull, Peter C
Sirianni, Nicky M
LeBron, Carlos I
Samaan, Marian N
Sutton, Felicia N
Reyes, Anatalio E
Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F
description This paper presents Etest determinations of MICs of selected antimicrobial agents for 76 isolates of Bacillus anthracis chosen for their diverse histories and 67, 12, and 4 cultures, respectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range of clinical and environmental sources. NCCLS breakpoints are now available for B. anthracis and ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; based on these breakpoints, the B. anthracis isolates were all fully susceptible to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, and all except four cultures, three of which had a known history of penicillin resistance and were thought to originate from the same original parent, were susceptible to penicillin. Based on NCCLS interpretive standards for grampositive and/or aerobic bacteria, all cultures were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin and 99% (one with intermediate sensitivity) of cultures were susceptible to vancomycin. No group trends were apparent among the different categories of B. cereus (isolates from food poisoning incidents and nongastrointestinal infections and food and environmental specimens not associated with illness). Differences between B. anthracis and the other species were as expected for amoxicillin and penicillin, with all B. anthracis cultures, apart from the four referred to above, being susceptible versus high proportions of resistant isolates for the other three species. Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate category. There was a slightly higher resistance to azithromycin among the B. anthracis strains than for the other species. The proportion of B. anthracis strains fully susceptible to erythromycin was also substantially lower than for the other species, although just a single B. cereus strain was fully resistant. Pub. in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v42 n8, p3626-3634, Aug 2004.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA447963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA447963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4479633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj7EKwkAMhrs4iPoGDnkAnRTFsdaKDi7WvVyvqQauObikgo_nm3mKUDenkO__f_5kmDxPx0zAN1CgQ6tYQ8pKFXklK9D4AFtjyblOwLDeQlxk1jOLAbtfoLcuEF8JWd5Gw3WvtQ_rqUaBffAtGDgbvuK7O3PEZI372HO-U_DcImskhe-CjREjsEPF0BLHG6tHLELIFUXHyaAxTnDynaNkus8v2WFexxdK0RjQMt2ly-V6s1os_sgvEHddFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Turnbull, Peter C ; Sirianni, Nicky M ; LeBron, Carlos I ; Samaan, Marian N ; Sutton, Felicia N ; Reyes, Anatalio E ; Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</creator><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Peter C ; Sirianni, Nicky M ; LeBron, Carlos I ; Samaan, Marian N ; Sutton, Felicia N ; Reyes, Anatalio E ; Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F ; NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER SILVER SPRING MD</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents Etest determinations of MICs of selected antimicrobial agents for 76 isolates of Bacillus anthracis chosen for their diverse histories and 67, 12, and 4 cultures, respectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range of clinical and environmental sources. NCCLS breakpoints are now available for B. anthracis and ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; based on these breakpoints, the B. anthracis isolates were all fully susceptible to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, and all except four cultures, three of which had a known history of penicillin resistance and were thought to originate from the same original parent, were susceptible to penicillin. Based on NCCLS interpretive standards for grampositive and/or aerobic bacteria, all cultures were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin and 99% (one with intermediate sensitivity) of cultures were susceptible to vancomycin. No group trends were apparent among the different categories of B. cereus (isolates from food poisoning incidents and nongastrointestinal infections and food and environmental specimens not associated with illness). Differences between B. anthracis and the other species were as expected for amoxicillin and penicillin, with all B. anthracis cultures, apart from the four referred to above, being susceptible versus high proportions of resistant isolates for the other three species. Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate category. There was a slightly higher resistance to azithromycin among the B. anthracis strains than for the other species. The proportion of B. anthracis strains fully susceptible to erythromycin was also substantially lower than for the other species, although just a single B. cereus strain was fully resistant. Pub. in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v42 n8, p3626-3634, Aug 2004.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AEROBIC BACTERIA ; AGAR ; ANTHRAX ; ANTIBIOTICS ; ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ; BACILLUS ; BACILLUS ANTHRACIS ; BACILLUS CEREUS ; BACILLUS MYCOIDES ; BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS ; Biochemistry ; CIPROFLOXACIN ; CULTURES(BIOLOGY) ; DILUTION ; ENVIRONMENTS ; ERYTHROMYCIN ; FOOD ; FOOD POISONING ; HISTORY ; INFECTIOUS DISEASES ; Microbiology ; PENICILLINS ; RESISTANCE ; SENSITIVITY ; SOURCES ; STRAINS(BIOLOGY) ; TEST METHODS ; TEST SETS ; TETRACYCLINES ; VANCOMYCIN</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA447963$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirianni, Nicky M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBron, Carlos I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, Marian N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Felicia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Anatalio E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER SILVER SPRING MD</creatorcontrib><title>MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest</title><description>This paper presents Etest determinations of MICs of selected antimicrobial agents for 76 isolates of Bacillus anthracis chosen for their diverse histories and 67, 12, and 4 cultures, respectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range of clinical and environmental sources. NCCLS breakpoints are now available for B. anthracis and ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; based on these breakpoints, the B. anthracis isolates were all fully susceptible to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, and all except four cultures, three of which had a known history of penicillin resistance and were thought to originate from the same original parent, were susceptible to penicillin. Based on NCCLS interpretive standards for grampositive and/or aerobic bacteria, all cultures were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin and 99% (one with intermediate sensitivity) of cultures were susceptible to vancomycin. No group trends were apparent among the different categories of B. cereus (isolates from food poisoning incidents and nongastrointestinal infections and food and environmental specimens not associated with illness). Differences between B. anthracis and the other species were as expected for amoxicillin and penicillin, with all B. anthracis cultures, apart from the four referred to above, being susceptible versus high proportions of resistant isolates for the other three species. Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate category. There was a slightly higher resistance to azithromycin among the B. anthracis strains than for the other species. The proportion of B. anthracis strains fully susceptible to erythromycin was also substantially lower than for the other species, although just a single B. cereus strain was fully resistant. Pub. in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v42 n8, p3626-3634, Aug 2004.</description><subject>AEROBIC BACTERIA</subject><subject>AGAR</subject><subject>ANTHRAX</subject><subject>ANTIBIOTICS</subject><subject>ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS</subject><subject>BACILLUS</subject><subject>BACILLUS ANTHRACIS</subject><subject>BACILLUS CEREUS</subject><subject>BACILLUS MYCOIDES</subject><subject>BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>CIPROFLOXACIN</subject><subject>CULTURES(BIOLOGY)</subject><subject>DILUTION</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTS</subject><subject>ERYTHROMYCIN</subject><subject>FOOD</subject><subject>FOOD POISONING</subject><subject>HISTORY</subject><subject>INFECTIOUS DISEASES</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>PENICILLINS</subject><subject>RESISTANCE</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>SOURCES</subject><subject>STRAINS(BIOLOGY)</subject><subject>TEST METHODS</subject><subject>TEST SETS</subject><subject>TETRACYCLINES</subject><subject>VANCOMYCIN</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj7EKwkAMhrs4iPoGDnkAnRTFsdaKDi7WvVyvqQauObikgo_nm3mKUDenkO__f_5kmDxPx0zAN1CgQ6tYQ8pKFXklK9D4AFtjyblOwLDeQlxk1jOLAbtfoLcuEF8JWd5Gw3WvtQ_rqUaBffAtGDgbvuK7O3PEZI372HO-U_DcImskhe-CjREjsEPF0BLHG6tHLELIFUXHyaAxTnDynaNkus8v2WFexxdK0RjQMt2ly-V6s1os_sgvEHddFQ</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Turnbull, Peter C</creator><creator>Sirianni, Nicky M</creator><creator>LeBron, Carlos I</creator><creator>Samaan, Marian N</creator><creator>Sutton, Felicia N</creator><creator>Reyes, Anatalio E</creator><creator>Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest</title><author>Turnbull, Peter C ; Sirianni, Nicky M ; LeBron, Carlos I ; Samaan, Marian N ; Sutton, Felicia N ; Reyes, Anatalio E ; Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4479633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>AEROBIC BACTERIA</topic><topic>AGAR</topic><topic>ANTHRAX</topic><topic>ANTIBIOTICS</topic><topic>ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS</topic><topic>BACILLUS</topic><topic>BACILLUS ANTHRACIS</topic><topic>BACILLUS CEREUS</topic><topic>BACILLUS MYCOIDES</topic><topic>BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>CIPROFLOXACIN</topic><topic>CULTURES(BIOLOGY)</topic><topic>DILUTION</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTS</topic><topic>ERYTHROMYCIN</topic><topic>FOOD</topic><topic>FOOD POISONING</topic><topic>HISTORY</topic><topic>INFECTIOUS DISEASES</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>PENICILLINS</topic><topic>RESISTANCE</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>SOURCES</topic><topic>STRAINS(BIOLOGY)</topic><topic>TEST METHODS</topic><topic>TEST SETS</topic><topic>TETRACYCLINES</topic><topic>VANCOMYCIN</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turnbull, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirianni, Nicky M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeBron, Carlos I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, Marian N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Felicia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Anatalio E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER SILVER SPRING MD</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turnbull, Peter C</au><au>Sirianni, Nicky M</au><au>LeBron, Carlos I</au><au>Samaan, Marian N</au><au>Sutton, Felicia N</au><au>Reyes, Anatalio E</au><au>Peruski ,Jr, Leonard F</au><aucorp>NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER SILVER SPRING MD</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest</btitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><abstract>This paper presents Etest determinations of MICs of selected antimicrobial agents for 76 isolates of Bacillus anthracis chosen for their diverse histories and 67, 12, and 4 cultures, respectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range of clinical and environmental sources. NCCLS breakpoints are now available for B. anthracis and ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline; based on these breakpoints, the B. anthracis isolates were all fully susceptible to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, and all except four cultures, three of which had a known history of penicillin resistance and were thought to originate from the same original parent, were susceptible to penicillin. Based on NCCLS interpretive standards for grampositive and/or aerobic bacteria, all cultures were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and gentamicin and 99% (one with intermediate sensitivity) of cultures were susceptible to vancomycin. No group trends were apparent among the different categories of B. cereus (isolates from food poisoning incidents and nongastrointestinal infections and food and environmental specimens not associated with illness). Differences between B. anthracis and the other species were as expected for amoxicillin and penicillin, with all B. anthracis cultures, apart from the four referred to above, being susceptible versus high proportions of resistant isolates for the other three species. Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate category. There was a slightly higher resistance to azithromycin among the B. anthracis strains than for the other species. The proportion of B. anthracis strains fully susceptible to erythromycin was also substantially lower than for the other species, although just a single B. cereus strain was fully resistant. Pub. in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v42 n8, p3626-3634, Aug 2004.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA447963
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AEROBIC BACTERIA
AGAR
ANTHRAX
ANTIBIOTICS
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
BACILLUS
BACILLUS ANTHRACIS
BACILLUS CEREUS
BACILLUS MYCOIDES
BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS
Biochemistry
CIPROFLOXACIN
CULTURES(BIOLOGY)
DILUTION
ENVIRONMENTS
ERYTHROMYCIN
FOOD
FOOD POISONING
HISTORY
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Microbiology
PENICILLINS
RESISTANCE
SENSITIVITY
SOURCES
STRAINS(BIOLOGY)
TEST METHODS
TEST SETS
TETRACYCLINES
VANCOMYCIN
title MICs of Selected Antibiotics for Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus mycoides From a Range of Clinical and Environmental Sources as Determined by the Etest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=MICs%20of%20Selected%20Antibiotics%20for%20Bacillus%20anthracis,%20Bacillus%20cereus,%20Bacillus%20thuringiensis,%20and%20Bacillus%20mycoides%20From%20a%20Range%20of%20Clinical%20and%20Environmental%20Sources%20as%20Determined%20by%20the%20Etest&rft.au=Turnbull,%20Peter%20C&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20MEDICAL%20RESEARCH%20CENTER%20SILVER%20SPRING%20MD&rft.date=2004-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA447963%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true