Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats
This study explores the changes that might be called for in the Department of Defense (DoD) learning environment to meet the challenges facing the United States as it responds to the asymmetric threats of the 21st century. In DoD planning terms, the concept of an asymmetric threat can be included in...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Tillson, John C Freeman, Waldo D Burns, William R Michel, John E LeCuyer, Jack A Scales, Robert H Worley, D R |
description | This study explores the changes that might be called for in the Department of Defense (DoD) learning environment to meet the challenges facing the United States as it responds to the asymmetric threats of the 21st century. In DoD planning terms, the concept of an asymmetric threat can be included in the concept of irregular warfare. In addressing this question, the IDA study team concluded that the asymmetric or irregular threats in the 21st century were largely unpredictable. Given the uncertainty of the threats, the key skill that individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders need to learn is adaptability -- defined as the degree to which adjustments are possible in practices, processes, or structures of systems to projected or actual changes of situation. In this context, the changes of situation are created by an asymmetric threat. Given this conclusion about the nature of the threats facing the United States, the study team set out to determine the elements of adaptability, to determine the extent to which the DoD learning establishment might already be focusing on adaptability learning, and to identify ways in which the DoD could facilitate efforts to learn to be adaptable. The authors found evidence across the department that DoD excels in training individuals and units in the set of skills essential for defeating traditional, symmetric, 20th century threats. They also found evidence of successful efforts to adapt these training techniques to the current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They found less evidence of a systemic effort to prepare individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders to defeat nontraditional, asymmetric, irregular threats. Accordingly, the authors conclude that the DoD needs to revise its learning paradigm to enhance its ability to learn to adapt to the new threats facing the United States.
Task BE-6-2456. The original document contains color images. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA442427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA442427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4424273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFD3SU0sysvMS1coyVdwTEksKAEziitzc1NLijKTFUIyilITS4p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbkpJZnJ8cUlmXmpJvKOLo4mJkYmRuTEBaQDr0ySx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Tillson, John C ; Freeman, Waldo D ; Burns, William R ; Michel, John E ; LeCuyer, Jack A ; Scales, Robert H ; Worley, D R</creator><creatorcontrib>Tillson, John C ; Freeman, Waldo D ; Burns, William R ; Michel, John E ; LeCuyer, Jack A ; Scales, Robert H ; Worley, D R ; INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the changes that might be called for in the Department of Defense (DoD) learning environment to meet the challenges facing the United States as it responds to the asymmetric threats of the 21st century. In DoD planning terms, the concept of an asymmetric threat can be included in the concept of irregular warfare. In addressing this question, the IDA study team concluded that the asymmetric or irregular threats in the 21st century were largely unpredictable. Given the uncertainty of the threats, the key skill that individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders need to learn is adaptability -- defined as the degree to which adjustments are possible in practices, processes, or structures of systems to projected or actual changes of situation. In this context, the changes of situation are created by an asymmetric threat. Given this conclusion about the nature of the threats facing the United States, the study team set out to determine the elements of adaptability, to determine the extent to which the DoD learning establishment might already be focusing on adaptability learning, and to identify ways in which the DoD could facilitate efforts to learn to be adaptable. The authors found evidence across the department that DoD excels in training individuals and units in the set of skills essential for defeating traditional, symmetric, 20th century threats. They also found evidence of successful efforts to adapt these training techniques to the current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They found less evidence of a systemic effort to prepare individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders to defeat nontraditional, asymmetric, irregular threats. Accordingly, the authors conclude that the DoD needs to revise its learning paradigm to enhance its ability to learn to adapt to the new threats facing the United States.
Task BE-6-2456. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ADAPTABILITY LEARNING ; ADAPTATION ; ADAPTIVE TRAINING ; AFGHANISTAN ; ASYMMETRICAL THREATS ; ASYMMETRY ; AWARENESS ; CLT(COMMANDER LEADER TEAMS) ; COGNITION ; COGNITIVE SKILLS ; CREATIVE THINKING ; CREATIVITY ; CRITICAL THINKING ; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ; Humanities and History ; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS ; INTUITION ; IRAQ ; IRREGULAR WARFARE ; LEADERSHIP TRAINING ; LEARNING ; Military Forces and Organizations ; MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) ; MILITARY TRAINING ; Psychology ; REASONING ; RELATIONAL SKILLS ; SELF AWARENESS ; SKILLS ; SOCIAL SKILLS ; T2(TRAINING TRANSFORMATION) ; TEACHING METHODS ; TEAMS(PERSONNEL) ; THREATS ; TRAINING ASSESSMENT ; TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT ; TRANSFORMATIONS</subject><creationdate>2005</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA442427$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tillson, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Waldo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeCuyer, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scales, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worley, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats</title><description>This study explores the changes that might be called for in the Department of Defense (DoD) learning environment to meet the challenges facing the United States as it responds to the asymmetric threats of the 21st century. In DoD planning terms, the concept of an asymmetric threat can be included in the concept of irregular warfare. In addressing this question, the IDA study team concluded that the asymmetric or irregular threats in the 21st century were largely unpredictable. Given the uncertainty of the threats, the key skill that individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders need to learn is adaptability -- defined as the degree to which adjustments are possible in practices, processes, or structures of systems to projected or actual changes of situation. In this context, the changes of situation are created by an asymmetric threat. Given this conclusion about the nature of the threats facing the United States, the study team set out to determine the elements of adaptability, to determine the extent to which the DoD learning establishment might already be focusing on adaptability learning, and to identify ways in which the DoD could facilitate efforts to learn to be adaptable. The authors found evidence across the department that DoD excels in training individuals and units in the set of skills essential for defeating traditional, symmetric, 20th century threats. They also found evidence of successful efforts to adapt these training techniques to the current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They found less evidence of a systemic effort to prepare individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders to defeat nontraditional, asymmetric, irregular threats. Accordingly, the authors conclude that the DoD needs to revise its learning paradigm to enhance its ability to learn to adapt to the new threats facing the United States.
Task BE-6-2456. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>ADAPTABILITY LEARNING</subject><subject>ADAPTATION</subject><subject>ADAPTIVE TRAINING</subject><subject>AFGHANISTAN</subject><subject>ASYMMETRICAL THREATS</subject><subject>ASYMMETRY</subject><subject>AWARENESS</subject><subject>CLT(COMMANDER LEADER TEAMS)</subject><subject>COGNITION</subject><subject>COGNITIVE SKILLS</subject><subject>CREATIVE THINKING</subject><subject>CREATIVITY</subject><subject>CRITICAL THINKING</subject><subject>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</subject><subject>Humanities and History</subject><subject>INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS</subject><subject>INTUITION</subject><subject>IRAQ</subject><subject>IRREGULAR WARFARE</subject><subject>LEADERSHIP TRAINING</subject><subject>LEARNING</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</subject><subject>MILITARY TRAINING</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>REASONING</subject><subject>RELATIONAL SKILLS</subject><subject>SELF AWARENESS</subject><subject>SKILLS</subject><subject>SOCIAL SKILLS</subject><subject>T2(TRAINING TRANSFORMATION)</subject><subject>TEACHING METHODS</subject><subject>TEAMS(PERSONNEL)</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>TRAINING ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>TRANSFORMATIONS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFD3SU0sysvMS1coyVdwTEksKAEziitzc1NLijKTFUIyilITS4p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbkpJZnJ8cUlmXmpJvKOLo4mJkYmRuTEBaQDr0ySx</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Tillson, John C</creator><creator>Freeman, Waldo D</creator><creator>Burns, William R</creator><creator>Michel, John E</creator><creator>LeCuyer, Jack A</creator><creator>Scales, Robert H</creator><creator>Worley, D R</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats</title><author>Tillson, John C ; Freeman, Waldo D ; Burns, William R ; Michel, John E ; LeCuyer, Jack A ; Scales, Robert H ; Worley, D R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4424273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>ADAPTABILITY LEARNING</topic><topic>ADAPTATION</topic><topic>ADAPTIVE TRAINING</topic><topic>AFGHANISTAN</topic><topic>ASYMMETRICAL THREATS</topic><topic>ASYMMETRY</topic><topic>AWARENESS</topic><topic>CLT(COMMANDER LEADER TEAMS)</topic><topic>COGNITION</topic><topic>COGNITIVE SKILLS</topic><topic>CREATIVE THINKING</topic><topic>CREATIVITY</topic><topic>CRITICAL THINKING</topic><topic>DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE</topic><topic>Humanities and History</topic><topic>INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS</topic><topic>INTUITION</topic><topic>IRAQ</topic><topic>IRREGULAR WARFARE</topic><topic>LEADERSHIP TRAINING</topic><topic>LEARNING</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</topic><topic>MILITARY TRAINING</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>REASONING</topic><topic>RELATIONAL SKILLS</topic><topic>SELF AWARENESS</topic><topic>SKILLS</topic><topic>SOCIAL SKILLS</topic><topic>T2(TRAINING TRANSFORMATION)</topic><topic>TEACHING METHODS</topic><topic>TEAMS(PERSONNEL)</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>TRAINING ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>TRANSFORMATIONS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tillson, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Waldo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeCuyer, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scales, Robert H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worley, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tillson, John C</au><au>Freeman, Waldo D</au><au>Burns, William R</au><au>Michel, John E</au><au>LeCuyer, Jack A</au><au>Scales, Robert H</au><au>Worley, D R</au><aucorp>INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats</btitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><abstract>This study explores the changes that might be called for in the Department of Defense (DoD) learning environment to meet the challenges facing the United States as it responds to the asymmetric threats of the 21st century. In DoD planning terms, the concept of an asymmetric threat can be included in the concept of irregular warfare. In addressing this question, the IDA study team concluded that the asymmetric or irregular threats in the 21st century were largely unpredictable. Given the uncertainty of the threats, the key skill that individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders need to learn is adaptability -- defined as the degree to which adjustments are possible in practices, processes, or structures of systems to projected or actual changes of situation. In this context, the changes of situation are created by an asymmetric threat. Given this conclusion about the nature of the threats facing the United States, the study team set out to determine the elements of adaptability, to determine the extent to which the DoD learning establishment might already be focusing on adaptability learning, and to identify ways in which the DoD could facilitate efforts to learn to be adaptable. The authors found evidence across the department that DoD excels in training individuals and units in the set of skills essential for defeating traditional, symmetric, 20th century threats. They also found evidence of successful efforts to adapt these training techniques to the current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They found less evidence of a systemic effort to prepare individuals, units, and teams of commanders and leaders to defeat nontraditional, asymmetric, irregular threats. Accordingly, the authors conclude that the DoD needs to revise its learning paradigm to enhance its ability to learn to adapt to the new threats facing the United States.
Task BE-6-2456. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA442427 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | ADAPTABILITY LEARNING ADAPTATION ADAPTIVE TRAINING AFGHANISTAN ASYMMETRICAL THREATS ASYMMETRY AWARENESS CLT(COMMANDER LEADER TEAMS) COGNITION COGNITIVE SKILLS CREATIVE THINKING CREATIVITY CRITICAL THINKING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Humanities and History INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS INTUITION IRAQ IRREGULAR WARFARE LEADERSHIP TRAINING LEARNING Military Forces and Organizations MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) MILITARY TRAINING Psychology REASONING RELATIONAL SKILLS SELF AWARENESS SKILLS SOCIAL SKILLS T2(TRAINING TRANSFORMATION) TEACHING METHODS TEAMS(PERSONNEL) THREATS TRAINING ASSESSMENT TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT TRANSFORMATIONS |
title | Learning to Adapt to Asymmetric Threats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T02%3A38%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Learning%20to%20Adapt%20to%20Asymmetric%20Threats&rft.au=Tillson,%20John%20C&rft.aucorp=INSTITUTE%20FOR%20DEFENSE%20ANALYSES%20ALEXANDRIA%20VA&rft.date=2005-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA442427%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |