Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications

This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Glumm, Monica M, Kehring, Kathy L, White, Timothy L
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Glumm, Monica M
Kehring, Kathy L
White, Timothy L
description This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations. The original document contains color images.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA437236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA437236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4372363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHbDzROpwnFpbB9oi5jS7cZTG7Af17JVrYCQPDzPBmWj3aENCrAAc4k2Q3gIs9mNyTcnpCk1HAXDgr2FtCp3Bi75Q4wlvWpSsqGH_PJFTaQqtiLEn554rHMUf60DKvJsENgouvz6rlobXNcdUr-U6UImpn9mZT79b1tv4zvwCJZUL5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L</creator><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L ; ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO) ; Acoustics ; AUDITORY SIGNALS ; COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS ; CUES(STIMULI) ; DETECTION ; DISPLAY SYSTEMS ; Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System ; POSITION(LOCATION) ; SENSORY MODALITIES ; SPATIAL LANGUAGES ; SPEECH ; TARGET ACQUISITION ; Target Direction, Range and Position Finding ; THREATS ; VISUAL SIGNALS</subject><creationdate>2005</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA437236$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehring, Kathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><description>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO)</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>AUDITORY SIGNALS</subject><subject>COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS</subject><subject>CUES(STIMULI)</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</subject><subject>POSITION(LOCATION)</subject><subject>SENSORY MODALITIES</subject><subject>SPATIAL LANGUAGES</subject><subject>SPEECH</subject><subject>TARGET ACQUISITION</subject><subject>Target Direction, Range and Position Finding</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>VISUAL SIGNALS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHbDzROpwnFpbB9oi5jS7cZTG7Af17JVrYCQPDzPBmWj3aENCrAAc4k2Q3gIs9mNyTcnpCk1HAXDgr2FtCp3Bi75Q4wlvWpSsqGH_PJFTaQqtiLEn554rHMUf60DKvJsENgouvz6rlobXNcdUr-U6UImpn9mZT79b1tv4zvwCJZUL5</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Glumm, Monica M</creator><creator>Kehring, Kathy L</creator><creator>White, Timothy L</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><author>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4372363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO)</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>AUDITORY SIGNALS</topic><topic>COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS</topic><topic>CUES(STIMULI)</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering &amp; Man Machine System</topic><topic>POSITION(LOCATION)</topic><topic>SENSORY MODALITIES</topic><topic>SPATIAL LANGUAGES</topic><topic>SPEECH</topic><topic>TARGET ACQUISITION</topic><topic>Target Direction, Range and Position Finding</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>VISUAL SIGNALS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehring, Kathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glumm, Monica M</au><au>Kehring, Kathy L</au><au>White, Timothy L</au><aucorp>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</btitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><abstract>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA437236
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects 3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO)
Acoustics
AUDITORY SIGNALS
COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS
CUES(STIMULI)
DETECTION
DISPLAY SYSTEMS
Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System
POSITION(LOCATION)
SENSORY MODALITIES
SPATIAL LANGUAGES
SPEECH
TARGET ACQUISITION
Target Direction, Range and Position Finding
THREATS
VISUAL SIGNALS
title Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Effects%20of%20Visual%20and%20Auditory%20Cues%20About%20Threat%20Location%20on%20Target%20Acquisition%20and%20Attention%20to%20Auditory%20Communications&rft.au=Glumm,%20Monica%20M&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20ABERDEEN%20PROVING%20GROUND%20MD%20HUMAN%20RESEARCH%20AND%20ENGINEERING%20DIRECTORATE&rft.date=2005-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA437236%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true