Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications
This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Glumm, Monica M Kehring, Kathy L White, Timothy L |
description | This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.
The original document contains color images. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA437236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA437236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4372363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHbDzROpwnFpbB9oi5jS7cZTG7Af17JVrYCQPDzPBmWj3aENCrAAc4k2Q3gIs9mNyTcnpCk1HAXDgr2FtCp3Bi75Q4wlvWpSsqGH_PJFTaQqtiLEn554rHMUf60DKvJsENgouvz6rlobXNcdUr-U6UImpn9mZT79b1tv4zvwCJZUL5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L</creator><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L ; ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.
The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO) ; Acoustics ; AUDITORY SIGNALS ; COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS ; CUES(STIMULI) ; DETECTION ; DISPLAY SYSTEMS ; Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System ; POSITION(LOCATION) ; SENSORY MODALITIES ; SPATIAL LANGUAGES ; SPEECH ; TARGET ACQUISITION ; Target Direction, Range and Position Finding ; THREATS ; VISUAL SIGNALS</subject><creationdate>2005</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA437236$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehring, Kathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><description>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.
The original document contains color images.</description><subject>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO)</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>AUDITORY SIGNALS</subject><subject>COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS</subject><subject>CUES(STIMULI)</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System</subject><subject>POSITION(LOCATION)</subject><subject>SENSORY MODALITIES</subject><subject>SPATIAL LANGUAGES</subject><subject>SPEECH</subject><subject>TARGET ACQUISITION</subject><subject>Target Direction, Range and Position Finding</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>VISUAL SIGNALS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEKAjEQRK-xEPUPLPYHbDzROpwnFpbB9oi5jS7cZTG7Af17JVrYCQPDzPBmWj3aENCrAAc4k2Q3gIs9mNyTcnpCk1HAXDgr2FtCp3Bi75Q4wlvWpSsqGH_PJFTaQqtiLEn554rHMUf60DKvJsENgouvz6rlobXNcdUr-U6UImpn9mZT79b1tv4zvwCJZUL5</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Glumm, Monica M</creator><creator>Kehring, Kathy L</creator><creator>White, Timothy L</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</title><author>Glumm, Monica M ; Kehring, Kathy L ; White, Timothy L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4372363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO)</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>AUDITORY SIGNALS</topic><topic>COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS</topic><topic>CUES(STIMULI)</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System</topic><topic>POSITION(LOCATION)</topic><topic>SENSORY MODALITIES</topic><topic>SPATIAL LANGUAGES</topic><topic>SPEECH</topic><topic>TARGET ACQUISITION</topic><topic>Target Direction, Range and Position Finding</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>VISUAL SIGNALS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glumm, Monica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehring, Kathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Timothy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glumm, Monica M</au><au>Kehring, Kathy L</au><au>White, Timothy L</au><aucorp>ARMY RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD HUMAN RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications</btitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><abstract>This study examined the effects of visual, spatial language and three-dimensional (3-D) audio cues about target location on target acquisition performance and the recall of information contained in concurrent radio communications. Two baseline conditions were also included in the analysis: no cues (Baseline 1) and target presence cues only (Baseline 2). In modes in which target location cues were provided, 100% of the targets presented were acquired, as compared to 94% in Baseline 1 and 95% in Baseline 2. On average, targets were acquired 1.4 seconds faster in the visual, spatial language, audio modes than in the baseline conditions, with times in the visual and 3-D audio modes being 1 second faster than those in spatial language. Overall workload scores were lower in the 3-D audio mode than in all other conditions except the visual mode. Less information (23%) was recalled from auditory communications in Baseline 1 than in the other four conditions where attention could be directed to communications between target presentations.
The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA437236 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | 3-D AUDIO(THREE DIMENSIONAL AUDIO) Acoustics AUDITORY SIGNALS COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS CUES(STIMULI) DETECTION DISPLAY SYSTEMS Human Factors Engineering & Man Machine System POSITION(LOCATION) SENSORY MODALITIES SPATIAL LANGUAGES SPEECH TARGET ACQUISITION Target Direction, Range and Position Finding THREATS VISUAL SIGNALS |
title | Effects of Visual and Auditory Cues About Threat Location on Target Acquisition and Attention to Auditory Communications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Effects%20of%20Visual%20and%20Auditory%20Cues%20About%20Threat%20Location%20on%20Target%20Acquisition%20and%20Attention%20to%20Auditory%20Communications&rft.au=Glumm,%20Monica%20M&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20ABERDEEN%20PROVING%20GROUND%20MD%20HUMAN%20RESEARCH%20AND%20ENGINEERING%20DIRECTORATE&rft.date=2005-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA437236%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |