Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements

Manpower is a major component of the Air Force's capability to meet its designated wartime and peacetime missions. However, manpower requirements also are a major driver of costs in the Air Force budget. Periodically, the Air Force goes through an internal process that arrives at revised estima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Carrillo, Manuel J, Massey, Hugh G, Bolten, Joseph G
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Carrillo, Manuel J
Massey, Hugh G
Bolten, Joseph G
description Manpower is a major component of the Air Force's capability to meet its designated wartime and peacetime missions. However, manpower requirements also are a major driver of costs in the Air Force budget. Periodically, the Air Force goes through an internal process that arrives at revised estimates of its manpower needs. The Total Force Assessment (TFA) carried out from 1999 to 2001 is the latest exercise to examine the wartime and peacetime demands for Air Force capability and to estimate overall manpower requirements. In 2000, Air Force Manpower and Organization (AF/XPM) asked the RAND Corporation to participate in the TFA. Robert Corsi, the deputy director at the time, emphasized the need for RAND to provide an independent assessment of the TFA process (later called TFA Phase I TFA-I) and its results, in addition to challenging assumptions while participating in the TFA. More recently, with the increased interest in sizing requirements for scenarios short of two major theater wars (MTWs), Brigadier General Joseph Stein, while at AF/XPM, asked RAND to provide a requirements-estimating methodology that would accommodate scenarios not previously used in requirements determination; this work would be part of a TFA Phase II (TFA-II). This report, which documents the information briefed to Colonel William Bennett, AF/XPMR, in October 2001, serves as a response to both of these Air Force requests. This report describes the new methodology that RAND proposed, which also uses some concepts that were part of the Air Force's TFA-I methods. The authors show how various Air Force policies and other alternatives affect requirements. Using Air Force data, the report also contrasts its requirements results for two MTW scenarios with those TFA-I provided the Air Force. They also considered the Aerospace Expeditionary Force (AEF) environment to check the suitability of requirements for meeting the AEF's needs during peacetime to participate in small scale contingencies. ISBN-0-8330-3581-9 (paperback).
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA429788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA429788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4297883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyTEPwVAQAOAuBsE_MNwf0AGJGhs0DE0aKka5vB4ueb2r906k_57BbvqGb5i4Sj27HlAaKMke2qjXew-mcBCnodOARnDBYNwSVB4lAsu3azX0cE5PKeQcoNDgCEqUTt8U4EjPFwdqSSyOk8ENfaTJz1EyLXb1Zj9rjN01GgvZNd_my_l6lWWLP_0Bs8s6ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Carrillo, Manuel J ; Massey, Hugh G ; Bolten, Joseph G</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Manuel J ; Massey, Hugh G ; Bolten, Joseph G ; RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA</creatorcontrib><description>Manpower is a major component of the Air Force's capability to meet its designated wartime and peacetime missions. However, manpower requirements also are a major driver of costs in the Air Force budget. Periodically, the Air Force goes through an internal process that arrives at revised estimates of its manpower needs. The Total Force Assessment (TFA) carried out from 1999 to 2001 is the latest exercise to examine the wartime and peacetime demands for Air Force capability and to estimate overall manpower requirements. In 2000, Air Force Manpower and Organization (AF/XPM) asked the RAND Corporation to participate in the TFA. Robert Corsi, the deputy director at the time, emphasized the need for RAND to provide an independent assessment of the TFA process (later called TFA Phase I TFA-I) and its results, in addition to challenging assumptions while participating in the TFA. More recently, with the increased interest in sizing requirements for scenarios short of two major theater wars (MTWs), Brigadier General Joseph Stein, while at AF/XPM, asked RAND to provide a requirements-estimating methodology that would accommodate scenarios not previously used in requirements determination; this work would be part of a TFA Phase II (TFA-II). This report, which documents the information briefed to Colonel William Bennett, AF/XPMR, in October 2001, serves as a response to both of these Air Force requests. This report describes the new methodology that RAND proposed, which also uses some concepts that were part of the Air Force's TFA-I methods. The authors show how various Air Force policies and other alternatives affect requirements. Using Air Force data, the report also contrasts its requirements results for two MTW scenarios with those TFA-I provided the Air Force. They also considered the Aerospace Expeditionary Force (AEF) environment to check the suitability of requirements for meeting the AEF's needs during peacetime to participate in small scale contingencies. ISBN-0-8330-3581-9 (paperback).</description><language>eng</language><subject>AEF(AEROSPACE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE) ; AIR FORCE ; AIR FORCE BUDGETS ; AIR FORCE PERSONNEL ; AIR FORCE PLANNING ; BIM(BASE INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL) ; ESTIMATES ; INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT ; MANPOWER ; METHODOLOGY ; Military Forces and Organizations ; Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics ; MILITARY REQUIREMENTS ; MTW(MAJOR THEATER WARS) ; PEACETIME ; Personnel Management and Labor Relations ; POLICIES ; PROJECT AIR FORCE ; SCENARIOS ; SMALL SCALE CONTINGENCIES ; TFA(TOTAL FORCE ASSESSMENT) ; THEATER LEVEL OPERATIONS ; TPFDD(TIME PHASED FORCE AND DEPLOYMENT DATA) ; WARTIME</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27545,27546</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA429788$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Manuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Hugh G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolten, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA</creatorcontrib><title>Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements</title><description>Manpower is a major component of the Air Force's capability to meet its designated wartime and peacetime missions. However, manpower requirements also are a major driver of costs in the Air Force budget. Periodically, the Air Force goes through an internal process that arrives at revised estimates of its manpower needs. The Total Force Assessment (TFA) carried out from 1999 to 2001 is the latest exercise to examine the wartime and peacetime demands for Air Force capability and to estimate overall manpower requirements. In 2000, Air Force Manpower and Organization (AF/XPM) asked the RAND Corporation to participate in the TFA. Robert Corsi, the deputy director at the time, emphasized the need for RAND to provide an independent assessment of the TFA process (later called TFA Phase I TFA-I) and its results, in addition to challenging assumptions while participating in the TFA. More recently, with the increased interest in sizing requirements for scenarios short of two major theater wars (MTWs), Brigadier General Joseph Stein, while at AF/XPM, asked RAND to provide a requirements-estimating methodology that would accommodate scenarios not previously used in requirements determination; this work would be part of a TFA Phase II (TFA-II). This report, which documents the information briefed to Colonel William Bennett, AF/XPMR, in October 2001, serves as a response to both of these Air Force requests. This report describes the new methodology that RAND proposed, which also uses some concepts that were part of the Air Force's TFA-I methods. The authors show how various Air Force policies and other alternatives affect requirements. Using Air Force data, the report also contrasts its requirements results for two MTW scenarios with those TFA-I provided the Air Force. They also considered the Aerospace Expeditionary Force (AEF) environment to check the suitability of requirements for meeting the AEF's needs during peacetime to participate in small scale contingencies. ISBN-0-8330-3581-9 (paperback).</description><subject>AEF(AEROSPACE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE)</subject><subject>AIR FORCE</subject><subject>AIR FORCE BUDGETS</subject><subject>AIR FORCE PERSONNEL</subject><subject>AIR FORCE PLANNING</subject><subject>BIM(BASE INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL)</subject><subject>ESTIMATES</subject><subject>INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>MANPOWER</subject><subject>METHODOLOGY</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</subject><subject>MILITARY REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>MTW(MAJOR THEATER WARS)</subject><subject>PEACETIME</subject><subject>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</subject><subject>POLICIES</subject><subject>PROJECT AIR FORCE</subject><subject>SCENARIOS</subject><subject>SMALL SCALE CONTINGENCIES</subject><subject>TFA(TOTAL FORCE ASSESSMENT)</subject><subject>THEATER LEVEL OPERATIONS</subject><subject>TPFDD(TIME PHASED FORCE AND DEPLOYMENT DATA)</subject><subject>WARTIME</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFyTEPwVAQAOAuBsE_MNwf0AGJGhs0DE0aKka5vB4ueb2r906k_57BbvqGb5i4Sj27HlAaKMke2qjXew-mcBCnodOARnDBYNwSVB4lAsu3azX0cE5PKeQcoNDgCEqUTt8U4EjPFwdqSSyOk8ENfaTJz1EyLXb1Zj9rjN01GgvZNd_my_l6lWWLP_0Bs8s6ug</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Carrillo, Manuel J</creator><creator>Massey, Hugh G</creator><creator>Bolten, Joseph G</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements</title><author>Carrillo, Manuel J ; Massey, Hugh G ; Bolten, Joseph G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4297883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>AEF(AEROSPACE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE)</topic><topic>AIR FORCE</topic><topic>AIR FORCE BUDGETS</topic><topic>AIR FORCE PERSONNEL</topic><topic>AIR FORCE PLANNING</topic><topic>BIM(BASE INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL)</topic><topic>ESTIMATES</topic><topic>INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>MANPOWER</topic><topic>METHODOLOGY</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</topic><topic>MILITARY REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>MTW(MAJOR THEATER WARS)</topic><topic>PEACETIME</topic><topic>Personnel Management and Labor Relations</topic><topic>POLICIES</topic><topic>PROJECT AIR FORCE</topic><topic>SCENARIOS</topic><topic>SMALL SCALE CONTINGENCIES</topic><topic>TFA(TOTAL FORCE ASSESSMENT)</topic><topic>THEATER LEVEL OPERATIONS</topic><topic>TPFDD(TIME PHASED FORCE AND DEPLOYMENT DATA)</topic><topic>WARTIME</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Manuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Hugh G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolten, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrillo, Manuel J</au><au>Massey, Hugh G</au><au>Bolten, Joseph G</au><aucorp>RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements</btitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><abstract>Manpower is a major component of the Air Force's capability to meet its designated wartime and peacetime missions. However, manpower requirements also are a major driver of costs in the Air Force budget. Periodically, the Air Force goes through an internal process that arrives at revised estimates of its manpower needs. The Total Force Assessment (TFA) carried out from 1999 to 2001 is the latest exercise to examine the wartime and peacetime demands for Air Force capability and to estimate overall manpower requirements. In 2000, Air Force Manpower and Organization (AF/XPM) asked the RAND Corporation to participate in the TFA. Robert Corsi, the deputy director at the time, emphasized the need for RAND to provide an independent assessment of the TFA process (later called TFA Phase I TFA-I) and its results, in addition to challenging assumptions while participating in the TFA. More recently, with the increased interest in sizing requirements for scenarios short of two major theater wars (MTWs), Brigadier General Joseph Stein, while at AF/XPM, asked RAND to provide a requirements-estimating methodology that would accommodate scenarios not previously used in requirements determination; this work would be part of a TFA Phase II (TFA-II). This report, which documents the information briefed to Colonel William Bennett, AF/XPMR, in October 2001, serves as a response to both of these Air Force requests. This report describes the new methodology that RAND proposed, which also uses some concepts that were part of the Air Force's TFA-I methods. The authors show how various Air Force policies and other alternatives affect requirements. Using Air Force data, the report also contrasts its requirements results for two MTW scenarios with those TFA-I provided the Air Force. They also considered the Aerospace Expeditionary Force (AEF) environment to check the suitability of requirements for meeting the AEF's needs during peacetime to participate in small scale contingencies. ISBN-0-8330-3581-9 (paperback).</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA429788
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AEF(AEROSPACE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE)
AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE BUDGETS
AIR FORCE PERSONNEL
AIR FORCE PLANNING
BIM(BASE INFRASTRUCTURE MODEL)
ESTIMATES
INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT
MANPOWER
METHODOLOGY
Military Forces and Organizations
Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics
MILITARY REQUIREMENTS
MTW(MAJOR THEATER WARS)
PEACETIME
Personnel Management and Labor Relations
POLICIES
PROJECT AIR FORCE
SCENARIOS
SMALL SCALE CONTINGENCIES
TFA(TOTAL FORCE ASSESSMENT)
THEATER LEVEL OPERATIONS
TPFDD(TIME PHASED FORCE AND DEPLOYMENT DATA)
WARTIME
title Policy and Methodology to Incorporate Wartime Plans into Total U.S. Air Force Manpower Requirements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A14%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Policy%20and%20Methodology%20to%20Incorporate%20Wartime%20Plans%20into%20Total%20U.S.%20Air%20Force%20Manpower%20Requirements&rft.au=Carrillo,%20Manuel%20J&rft.aucorp=RAND%20CORP%20SANTA%20MONICA%20CA&rft.date=2004-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA429788%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true