What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001
This study set out to determine why the term Battlefield Air Interdiction (BAI) disappeared from the military lexicon following the Persian Gulf War. To accomplish this task, the study demonstrates that BAI was present in both US Army and US Air Force doctrine before the war and that it was removed...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | McCaffrey, Terrance J , III |
| description | This study set out to determine why the term Battlefield Air Interdiction (BAI) disappeared from the military lexicon following the Persian Gulf War. To accomplish this task, the study demonstrates that BAI was present in both US Army and US Air Force doctrine before the war and that it was removed after the war. Additionally, the study investigates three possible explanations for this occurrence. First, it considers whether BAI was eliminated because it no longer served a useful purpose. Second, it contemplates whether service self-interest was instrumental in removing BAI from the doctrine. Finally, the study examines each service's doctrinal development process to determine if the processes themselves were a contributing factor.
The original document contains color images. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA420526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA420526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4205263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjL0KwkAQBtNYiPoGFt8LBGLUtHJ6hpSCActw5DZ6cD9hswi-vSnsrQZmYJbZ8_EygsaMI0WyaBPOxp2gOHxgooVyjDpxT7MX8TQ48hY69cIuEjS9yacxUBQMnAJuTLmmiVhwl8QBklAWxW6dLQbjJ9r8uMq29bW9NLkV13eTzDPplFaHsjiW1f5P_gLQWToz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</creator><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III ; AIR UNIV MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><description>This study set out to determine why the term Battlefield Air Interdiction (BAI) disappeared from the military lexicon following the Persian Gulf War. To accomplish this task, the study demonstrates that BAI was present in both US Army and US Air Force doctrine before the war and that it was removed after the war. Additionally, the study investigates three possible explanations for this occurrence. First, it considers whether BAI was eliminated because it no longer served a useful purpose. Second, it contemplates whether service self-interest was instrumental in removing BAI from the doctrine. Finally, the study examines each service's doctrinal development process to determine if the processes themselves were a contributing factor.
The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AIR FORCE ; AIR INTERDICTION ; AIR POWER ; AIRBORNE ; BAI(BATTLEFIELD AIR INTERDICTION) ; BATTLEFIELDS ; INTERDICTION ; LESSONS LEARNED ; MILITARY DOCTRINE ; MILITARY OPERATIONS ; Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics ; PERSIAN GULF WAR ; WARFARE</subject><creationdate>2002</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA420526$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR UNIV MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><title>What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001</title><description>This study set out to determine why the term Battlefield Air Interdiction (BAI) disappeared from the military lexicon following the Persian Gulf War. To accomplish this task, the study demonstrates that BAI was present in both US Army and US Air Force doctrine before the war and that it was removed after the war. Additionally, the study investigates three possible explanations for this occurrence. First, it considers whether BAI was eliminated because it no longer served a useful purpose. Second, it contemplates whether service self-interest was instrumental in removing BAI from the doctrine. Finally, the study examines each service's doctrinal development process to determine if the processes themselves were a contributing factor.
The original document contains color images.</description><subject>AIR FORCE</subject><subject>AIR INTERDICTION</subject><subject>AIR POWER</subject><subject>AIRBORNE</subject><subject>BAI(BATTLEFIELD AIR INTERDICTION)</subject><subject>BATTLEFIELDS</subject><subject>INTERDICTION</subject><subject>LESSONS LEARNED</subject><subject>MILITARY DOCTRINE</subject><subject>MILITARY OPERATIONS</subject><subject>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</subject><subject>PERSIAN GULF WAR</subject><subject>WARFARE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjL0KwkAQBtNYiPoGFt8LBGLUtHJ6hpSCActw5DZ6cD9hswi-vSnsrQZmYJbZ8_EygsaMI0WyaBPOxp2gOHxgooVyjDpxT7MX8TQ48hY69cIuEjS9yacxUBQMnAJuTLmmiVhwl8QBklAWxW6dLQbjJ9r8uMq29bW9NLkV13eTzDPplFaHsjiW1f5P_gLQWToz</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001</title><author>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4205263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>AIR FORCE</topic><topic>AIR INTERDICTION</topic><topic>AIR POWER</topic><topic>AIRBORNE</topic><topic>BAI(BATTLEFIELD AIR INTERDICTION)</topic><topic>BATTLEFIELDS</topic><topic>INTERDICTION</topic><topic>LESSONS LEARNED</topic><topic>MILITARY DOCTRINE</topic><topic>MILITARY OPERATIONS</topic><topic>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</topic><topic>PERSIAN GULF WAR</topic><topic>WARFARE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR UNIV MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCaffrey, Terrance J , III</au><aucorp>AIR UNIV MAXWELL AFB AL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001</btitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><abstract>This study set out to determine why the term Battlefield Air Interdiction (BAI) disappeared from the military lexicon following the Persian Gulf War. To accomplish this task, the study demonstrates that BAI was present in both US Army and US Air Force doctrine before the war and that it was removed after the war. Additionally, the study investigates three possible explanations for this occurrence. First, it considers whether BAI was eliminated because it no longer served a useful purpose. Second, it contemplates whether service self-interest was instrumental in removing BAI from the doctrine. Finally, the study examines each service's doctrinal development process to determine if the processes themselves were a contributing factor.
The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA420526 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | AIR FORCE AIR INTERDICTION AIR POWER AIRBORNE BAI(BATTLEFIELD AIR INTERDICTION) BATTLEFIELDS INTERDICTION LESSONS LEARNED MILITARY DOCTRINE MILITARY OPERATIONS Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics PERSIAN GULF WAR WARFARE |
| title | What Happened To Bai? Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T00%3A43%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=What%20Happened%20To%20Bai?%20Army%20and%20Air%20Force%20Battlefield%20Doctrine%20Development%20from%20Pre-Desert%20Storm%20to%202001&rft.au=McCaffrey,%20Terrance%20J%20,%20III&rft.aucorp=AIR%20UNIV%20MAXWELL%20AFB%20AL&rft.date=2002-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA420526%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |