Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands
This report on the transition of Army missile acquisition programs is the first in a series of reports. Subsequent reports will be issued for the transition of Navy and Air Force missile acquisition programs. In part, the Army will accomplish severe cuts in its staff levels planned for FY 1998 by tr...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Brannin, Patricia A Meling, John E Flynn, Brian M Petz, Verne F Sullenberger, Keith A |
description | This report on the transition of Army missile acquisition programs is the first in a series of reports. Subsequent reports will be issued for the transition of Navy and Air Force missile acquisition programs. In part, the Army will accomplish severe cuts in its staff levels planned for FY 1998 by transitioning the responsibility for management of weapon systems from program management offices to commodity commands. Reductions in weapon system management staff levels are based on the premise that weapon systems that transition from their acquisition phase with program management offices to their sustainment phase with commodity commands require less intensive management and, therefore, less staff. The Army generally cuts program management staffing in half when programs transition to commodity commands. To assist in meeting planned Army-wide staff cuts for FY 1998, the Army is planning to transition as many as 200 weapon systems to commodity commands. The unusually large number of systems to be transitioned was the reason for this audit. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA369426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA369426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3694263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFiTEKwkAQANNYiPoDi_2AjZGA5REVm6BF-nDc7YWF3C7erkV-L0isrWaGWVfYF89KRsIgCVzJM3SkShOCC683Le9ZZCw-K6Qi-VfQefYjZmSDR0oUUMEEWslZItn8Nc9Rt9Uq-Ulxt3BT7W_Xvr0folEY1IjRBndxdXM-HZv6z_4Ar-U8WQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Brannin, Patricia A ; Meling, John E ; Flynn, Brian M ; Petz, Verne F ; Sullenberger, Keith A</creator><creatorcontrib>Brannin, Patricia A ; Meling, John E ; Flynn, Brian M ; Petz, Verne F ; Sullenberger, Keith A ; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA</creatorcontrib><description>This report on the transition of Army missile acquisition programs is the first in a series of reports. Subsequent reports will be issued for the transition of Navy and Air Force missile acquisition programs. In part, the Army will accomplish severe cuts in its staff levels planned for FY 1998 by transitioning the responsibility for management of weapon systems from program management offices to commodity commands. Reductions in weapon system management staff levels are based on the premise that weapon systems that transition from their acquisition phase with program management offices to their sustainment phase with commodity commands require less intensive management and, therefore, less staff. The Army generally cuts program management staffing in half when programs transition to commodity commands. To assist in meeting planned Army-wide staff cuts for FY 1998, the Army is planning to transition as many as 200 weapon systems to commodity commands. The unusually large number of systems to be transitioned was the reason for this audit.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Administration and Management ; ARMY EQUIPMENT ; ARMY PROCUREMENT ; AUDIT REPORT ; AUDITING ; DECISION MAKING ; GUIDED MISSILES ; MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL ; MILITARY BUDGETS ; MILITARY DOWNSIZING ; SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT ; WEAPON SYSTEMS ; Y2K COMPLIANT ; YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT</subject><creationdate>1997</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,778,883,27550,27551</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA369426$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brannin, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meling, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petz, Verne F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullenberger, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA</creatorcontrib><title>Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands</title><description>This report on the transition of Army missile acquisition programs is the first in a series of reports. Subsequent reports will be issued for the transition of Navy and Air Force missile acquisition programs. In part, the Army will accomplish severe cuts in its staff levels planned for FY 1998 by transitioning the responsibility for management of weapon systems from program management offices to commodity commands. Reductions in weapon system management staff levels are based on the premise that weapon systems that transition from their acquisition phase with program management offices to their sustainment phase with commodity commands require less intensive management and, therefore, less staff. The Army generally cuts program management staffing in half when programs transition to commodity commands. To assist in meeting planned Army-wide staff cuts for FY 1998, the Army is planning to transition as many as 200 weapon systems to commodity commands. The unusually large number of systems to be transitioned was the reason for this audit.</description><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>ARMY EQUIPMENT</subject><subject>ARMY PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>AUDIT REPORT</subject><subject>AUDITING</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>GUIDED MISSILES</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL</subject><subject>MILITARY BUDGETS</subject><subject>MILITARY DOWNSIZING</subject><subject>SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>WEAPON SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Y2K COMPLIANT</subject><subject>YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFiTEKwkAQANNYiPoDi_2AjZGA5REVm6BF-nDc7YWF3C7erkV-L0isrWaGWVfYF89KRsIgCVzJM3SkShOCC683Le9ZZCw-K6Qi-VfQefYjZmSDR0oUUMEEWslZItn8Nc9Rt9Uq-Ulxt3BT7W_Xvr0folEY1IjRBndxdXM-HZv6z_4Ar-U8WQ</recordid><startdate>19970728</startdate><enddate>19970728</enddate><creator>Brannin, Patricia A</creator><creator>Meling, John E</creator><creator>Flynn, Brian M</creator><creator>Petz, Verne F</creator><creator>Sullenberger, Keith A</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970728</creationdate><title>Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands</title><author>Brannin, Patricia A ; Meling, John E ; Flynn, Brian M ; Petz, Verne F ; Sullenberger, Keith A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3694263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>ARMY EQUIPMENT</topic><topic>ARMY PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>AUDIT REPORT</topic><topic>AUDITING</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>GUIDED MISSILES</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL</topic><topic>MILITARY BUDGETS</topic><topic>MILITARY DOWNSIZING</topic><topic>SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>WEAPON SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Y2K COMPLIANT</topic><topic>YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brannin, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meling, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petz, Verne F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullenberger, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brannin, Patricia A</au><au>Meling, John E</au><au>Flynn, Brian M</au><au>Petz, Verne F</au><au>Sullenberger, Keith A</au><aucorp>INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands</btitle><date>1997-07-28</date><risdate>1997</risdate><abstract>This report on the transition of Army missile acquisition programs is the first in a series of reports. Subsequent reports will be issued for the transition of Navy and Air Force missile acquisition programs. In part, the Army will accomplish severe cuts in its staff levels planned for FY 1998 by transitioning the responsibility for management of weapon systems from program management offices to commodity commands. Reductions in weapon system management staff levels are based on the premise that weapon systems that transition from their acquisition phase with program management offices to their sustainment phase with commodity commands require less intensive management and, therefore, less staff. The Army generally cuts program management staffing in half when programs transition to commodity commands. To assist in meeting planned Army-wide staff cuts for FY 1998, the Army is planning to transition as many as 200 weapon systems to commodity commands. The unusually large number of systems to be transitioned was the reason for this audit.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA369426 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | Administration and Management ARMY EQUIPMENT ARMY PROCUREMENT AUDIT REPORT AUDITING DECISION MAKING GUIDED MISSILES MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL MILITARY BUDGETS MILITARY DOWNSIZING SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT WEAPON SYSTEMS Y2K COMPLIANT YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT |
title | Transition of Army Missile Acquisition Programs from Program Management Offices to Commodity Commands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Transition%20of%20Army%20Missile%20Acquisition%20Programs%20from%20Program%20Management%20Offices%20to%20Commodity%20Commands&rft.au=Brannin,%20Patricia%20A&rft.aucorp=INSPECTOR%20GENERAL%20DEPT%20OF%20DEFENSE%20ARLINGTON%20VA&rft.date=1997-07-28&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA369426%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |