The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction
Today illegal drugs, especially cocaine, and illegal aliens continue to flow into the United States in massive quantities. Interdiction programs intended to stem the flow of drugs and aliens have been relatively unsuccessful. The cost of drug use and illegal aliens creates crushing financial burdens...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Nimmich, Joseph L |
description | Today illegal drugs, especially cocaine, and illegal aliens continue to flow into the United States in massive quantities. Interdiction programs intended to stem the flow of drugs and aliens have been relatively unsuccessful. The cost of drug use and illegal aliens creates crushing financial burdens on our federal, state, and local governments, as well as on individuals. Maritime law enforcement interdiction operations more closely approximate military operations than conventional law enforcement. Military deterrence theory, both nuclear and conventional, is well researched and documented. This research has identified the elements which create conventional military deterrence. Through comparison of the elements of conventional military deterrence to maritime law enforcement interdiction we can identify shortcomings in creating deterrence in maritime law enforcement interdiction. Application of conventional military deterrence theory to maritime law enforcement interdiction can improve our understanding of the methods and tools necessary to create deterrence in maritime smuggling. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA326899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA326899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3268993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLsKwkAQRbexEPUPLOYHbAyIKZc8UDBd-rBsZnFgMxM2g-LfuwF7q8t9nLs1vn8i2HmO5J2SMEiASviFvDoXoaNI6tIHalRMCdkjZEZyogKdS6Q0ITzcGxoOkjxOmYU75_VIfn3Zm01wccHDT3fm2DZ9dTuNSn5YlBh1sLUtzpdrWRZ_6i8ezjuy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Nimmich, Joseph L</creator><creatorcontrib>Nimmich, Joseph L ; ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><description>Today illegal drugs, especially cocaine, and illegal aliens continue to flow into the United States in massive quantities. Interdiction programs intended to stem the flow of drugs and aliens have been relatively unsuccessful. The cost of drug use and illegal aliens creates crushing financial burdens on our federal, state, and local governments, as well as on individuals. Maritime law enforcement interdiction operations more closely approximate military operations than conventional law enforcement. Military deterrence theory, both nuclear and conventional, is well researched and documented. This research has identified the elements which create conventional military deterrence. Through comparison of the elements of conventional military deterrence to maritime law enforcement interdiction we can identify shortcomings in creating deterrence in maritime law enforcement interdiction. Application of conventional military deterrence theory to maritime law enforcement interdiction can improve our understanding of the methods and tools necessary to create deterrence in maritime smuggling.</description><language>eng</language><subject>COCAINE ; COSTS ; DETERRENCE ; DRUG INTERDICTION ; DRUGS ; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ; FLOW ; FOREIGN ; Government and Political Science ; INTERDICTION ; LAW ENFORCEMENT ; LOCAL GOVERNMENT ; MILITARY OPERATIONS ; THEORY ; UNITED STATES</subject><creationdate>1997</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA326899$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nimmich, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><title>The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction</title><description>Today illegal drugs, especially cocaine, and illegal aliens continue to flow into the United States in massive quantities. Interdiction programs intended to stem the flow of drugs and aliens have been relatively unsuccessful. The cost of drug use and illegal aliens creates crushing financial burdens on our federal, state, and local governments, as well as on individuals. Maritime law enforcement interdiction operations more closely approximate military operations than conventional law enforcement. Military deterrence theory, both nuclear and conventional, is well researched and documented. This research has identified the elements which create conventional military deterrence. Through comparison of the elements of conventional military deterrence to maritime law enforcement interdiction we can identify shortcomings in creating deterrence in maritime law enforcement interdiction. Application of conventional military deterrence theory to maritime law enforcement interdiction can improve our understanding of the methods and tools necessary to create deterrence in maritime smuggling.</description><subject>COCAINE</subject><subject>COSTS</subject><subject>DETERRENCE</subject><subject>DRUG INTERDICTION</subject><subject>DRUGS</subject><subject>FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>FLOW</subject><subject>FOREIGN</subject><subject>Government and Political Science</subject><subject>INTERDICTION</subject><subject>LAW ENFORCEMENT</subject><subject>LOCAL GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>MILITARY OPERATIONS</subject><subject>THEORY</subject><subject>UNITED STATES</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLsKwkAQRbexEPUPLOYHbAyIKZc8UDBd-rBsZnFgMxM2g-LfuwF7q8t9nLs1vn8i2HmO5J2SMEiASviFvDoXoaNI6tIHalRMCdkjZEZyogKdS6Q0ITzcGxoOkjxOmYU75_VIfn3Zm01wccHDT3fm2DZ9dTuNSn5YlBh1sLUtzpdrWRZ_6i8ezjuy</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Nimmich, Joseph L</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction</title><author>Nimmich, Joseph L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3268993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>COCAINE</topic><topic>COSTS</topic><topic>DETERRENCE</topic><topic>DRUG INTERDICTION</topic><topic>DRUGS</topic><topic>FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>FLOW</topic><topic>FOREIGN</topic><topic>Government and Political Science</topic><topic>INTERDICTION</topic><topic>LAW ENFORCEMENT</topic><topic>LOCAL GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>MILITARY OPERATIONS</topic><topic>THEORY</topic><topic>UNITED STATES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nimmich, Joseph L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nimmich, Joseph L</au><aucorp>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction</btitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><abstract>Today illegal drugs, especially cocaine, and illegal aliens continue to flow into the United States in massive quantities. Interdiction programs intended to stem the flow of drugs and aliens have been relatively unsuccessful. The cost of drug use and illegal aliens creates crushing financial burdens on our federal, state, and local governments, as well as on individuals. Maritime law enforcement interdiction operations more closely approximate military operations than conventional law enforcement. Military deterrence theory, both nuclear and conventional, is well researched and documented. This research has identified the elements which create conventional military deterrence. Through comparison of the elements of conventional military deterrence to maritime law enforcement interdiction we can identify shortcomings in creating deterrence in maritime law enforcement interdiction. Application of conventional military deterrence theory to maritime law enforcement interdiction can improve our understanding of the methods and tools necessary to create deterrence in maritime smuggling.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA326899 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | COCAINE COSTS DETERRENCE DRUG INTERDICTION DRUGS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FLOW FOREIGN Government and Political Science INTERDICTION LAW ENFORCEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT MILITARY OPERATIONS THEORY UNITED STATES |
title | The Application of Conventional Military Deterrence Theory to Maritime Law Enforcement Interdiction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The%20Application%20of%20Conventional%20Military%20Deterrence%20Theory%20to%20Maritime%20Law%20Enforcement%20Interdiction&rft.au=Nimmich,%20Joseph%20L&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20WAR%20COLL%20CARLISLE%20BARRACKS%20PA&rft.date=1997&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA326899%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |