ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms

Based on analysis of years grouped by pre-ELF and operational periods, density fluctuations of arthropods (Collembola and mites) were, in some taxa, significantly different between sites; in others, differences between year groups were significant within either of the study sites. No consistent patt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Snider, Richard J, Snider, Renate M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Snider, Richard J
Snider, Renate M
description Based on analysis of years grouped by pre-ELF and operational periods, density fluctuations of arthropods (Collembola and mites) were, in some taxa, significantly different between sites; in others, differences between year groups were significant within either of the study sites. No consistent patterns were seen at the level of species or higher taxa. In some species, effects of the 1988 drought may have carried over into 1989, the first year of antenna operation. Surface-active Collembola, velvet mites and carabid beetles did not alter their activity patterns following antenna activation (e.g., species predominantly spring-active remained spring-active). Although analyses routinely yielded significant differences with respect to total numbers captured -in Test and Control, numbers alone were found to be unreliable estimators for disturbance, because a variety of potentially important factors other than EM fields were present. Weekly changes in relative numbers captured, however, showed that increases and decreases in activity were synchronous in the study sites. Carabid beetle activity, which is highly seasonal and governed mainly by reproductive processes, was not affected by EM fields.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA297182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA297182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2971823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFibEKwjAQQLM4iPoHDvcDDtZB7RZqioOCUMGxhDTGgyQnlxPx7-3g7vR4703VzZxaaCilV0ZnBSkX6D5FfALjKFIYa4QzZRRizAEuTIFtqqEjjKBZHkxPGgrYPICxo7-JU5mryd3G4hc_ztSyNdfmuBoEXV8Es5deH3S136531ebP_gIBmjb_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Snider, Richard J ; Snider, Renate M</creator><creatorcontrib>Snider, Richard J ; Snider, Renate M ; IIT RESEARCH INST CHICAGO IL</creatorcontrib><description>Based on analysis of years grouped by pre-ELF and operational periods, density fluctuations of arthropods (Collembola and mites) were, in some taxa, significantly different between sites; in others, differences between year groups were significant within either of the study sites. No consistent patterns were seen at the level of species or higher taxa. In some species, effects of the 1988 drought may have carried over into 1989, the first year of antenna operation. Surface-active Collembola, velvet mites and carabid beetles did not alter their activity patterns following antenna activation (e.g., species predominantly spring-active remained spring-active). Although analyses routinely yielded significant differences with respect to total numbers captured -in Test and Control, numbers alone were found to be unreliable estimators for disturbance, because a variety of potentially important factors other than EM fields were present. Weekly changes in relative numbers captured, however, showed that increases and decreases in activity were synchronous in the study sites. Carabid beetle activity, which is highly seasonal and governed mainly by reproductive processes, was not affected by EM fields.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ANTENNAS ; ARTHROPODA ; Biology ; COLEOPTERA ; CONSISTENCY ; DENSITY ; EARTHWORMS ; ECOLOGY ; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ; MITES ; NUMBERS ; OPERATION ; PATTERNS ; REPRODUCTION(PHYSIOLOGY) ; SITES ; SOILS ; VARIATIONS ; WORMS</subject><creationdate>1995</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,778,883,27554,27555</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA297182$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snider, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, Renate M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IIT RESEARCH INST CHICAGO IL</creatorcontrib><title>ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms</title><description>Based on analysis of years grouped by pre-ELF and operational periods, density fluctuations of arthropods (Collembola and mites) were, in some taxa, significantly different between sites; in others, differences between year groups were significant within either of the study sites. No consistent patterns were seen at the level of species or higher taxa. In some species, effects of the 1988 drought may have carried over into 1989, the first year of antenna operation. Surface-active Collembola, velvet mites and carabid beetles did not alter their activity patterns following antenna activation (e.g., species predominantly spring-active remained spring-active). Although analyses routinely yielded significant differences with respect to total numbers captured -in Test and Control, numbers alone were found to be unreliable estimators for disturbance, because a variety of potentially important factors other than EM fields were present. Weekly changes in relative numbers captured, however, showed that increases and decreases in activity were synchronous in the study sites. Carabid beetle activity, which is highly seasonal and governed mainly by reproductive processes, was not affected by EM fields.</description><subject>ANTENNAS</subject><subject>ARTHROPODA</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>COLEOPTERA</subject><subject>CONSISTENCY</subject><subject>DENSITY</subject><subject>EARTHWORMS</subject><subject>ECOLOGY</subject><subject>ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS</subject><subject>MITES</subject><subject>NUMBERS</subject><subject>OPERATION</subject><subject>PATTERNS</subject><subject>REPRODUCTION(PHYSIOLOGY)</subject><subject>SITES</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>VARIATIONS</subject><subject>WORMS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFibEKwjAQQLM4iPoHDvcDDtZB7RZqioOCUMGxhDTGgyQnlxPx7-3g7vR4703VzZxaaCilV0ZnBSkX6D5FfALjKFIYa4QzZRRizAEuTIFtqqEjjKBZHkxPGgrYPICxo7-JU5mryd3G4hc_ztSyNdfmuBoEXV8Es5deH3S136531ebP_gIBmjb_</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Snider, Richard J</creator><creator>Snider, Renate M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms</title><author>Snider, Richard J ; Snider, Renate M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2971823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>ANTENNAS</topic><topic>ARTHROPODA</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>COLEOPTERA</topic><topic>CONSISTENCY</topic><topic>DENSITY</topic><topic>EARTHWORMS</topic><topic>ECOLOGY</topic><topic>ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS</topic><topic>MITES</topic><topic>NUMBERS</topic><topic>OPERATION</topic><topic>PATTERNS</topic><topic>REPRODUCTION(PHYSIOLOGY)</topic><topic>SITES</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>VARIATIONS</topic><topic>WORMS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snider, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snider, Renate M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IIT RESEARCH INST CHICAGO IL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snider, Richard J</au><au>Snider, Renate M</au><aucorp>IIT RESEARCH INST CHICAGO IL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms</btitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><abstract>Based on analysis of years grouped by pre-ELF and operational periods, density fluctuations of arthropods (Collembola and mites) were, in some taxa, significantly different between sites; in others, differences between year groups were significant within either of the study sites. No consistent patterns were seen at the level of species or higher taxa. In some species, effects of the 1988 drought may have carried over into 1989, the first year of antenna operation. Surface-active Collembola, velvet mites and carabid beetles did not alter their activity patterns following antenna activation (e.g., species predominantly spring-active remained spring-active). Although analyses routinely yielded significant differences with respect to total numbers captured -in Test and Control, numbers alone were found to be unreliable estimators for disturbance, because a variety of potentially important factors other than EM fields were present. Weekly changes in relative numbers captured, however, showed that increases and decreases in activity were synchronous in the study sites. Carabid beetle activity, which is highly seasonal and governed mainly by reproductive processes, was not affected by EM fields.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA297182
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ANTENNAS
ARTHROPODA
Biology
COLEOPTERA
CONSISTENCY
DENSITY
EARTHWORMS
ECOLOGY
ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
MITES
NUMBERS
OPERATION
PATTERNS
REPRODUCTION(PHYSIOLOGY)
SITES
SOILS
VARIATIONS
WORMS
title ELF Communications System Ecological Monitoring Program: Soil Arthropods and Earthworms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=ELF%20Communications%20System%20Ecological%20Monitoring%20Program:%20Soil%20Arthropods%20and%20Earthworms&rft.au=Snider,%20Richard%20J&rft.aucorp=IIT%20RESEARCH%20INST%20CHICAGO%20IL&rft.date=1995-04&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA297182%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true