The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants

Congress has directed that Department of Defense steam generating plants in the United States be converted to coal-burning facilities to reduce the dependence on petroleum fuels. To help meet this requirement, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assessed coal water fuel (CWF)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ask, Thomas E, Hartsock, Donald K, Davidson, Jill E, Schanche, Gary W
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ask, Thomas E
Hartsock, Donald K
Davidson, Jill E
Schanche, Gary W
description Congress has directed that Department of Defense steam generating plants in the United States be converted to coal-burning facilities to reduce the dependence on petroleum fuels. To help meet this requirement, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assessed coal water fuel (CWF) which has the potential to be an efficient, inexpensive, and reliable replacement for petroleum fuels. However, the actual costs of producing and burning CWF are not yet known. Researcher (1) developed a cost model for CWF, (2) assessed the engineering and economic requirements of converting a boiler to burn CWF, and (3) designed a complete firing system based on a specification for CWF developed to ensure that the fuel will work in converted boiler. This study indicated that a CWF retrofit is technically feasible and will soon become economically attractive. CWF can cost as little as $2.61 per million British thermal units (MBtu) and an industrial sized oil-designed boiler can be retrofitted to burn CWF for approximately $1.9 million. CWF should be demonstrated in a long-term test program to determine equipment specifications, operational characteristics, systems control requirements, and maintenance needs.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA240021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA240021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2400213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHAJyUhVcE3Oz8vPzUwuVkjMS1FwLCjIyUxOLMnMz1PIT1Nwzk_MUQhPLEktUnArTc1RyMxTcCzKrVTwSE0sUQjIScwrKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6ORiYGBkaGxgSkARCTLkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Ask, Thomas E ; Hartsock, Donald K ; Davidson, Jill E ; Schanche, Gary W</creator><creatorcontrib>Ask, Thomas E ; Hartsock, Donald K ; Davidson, Jill E ; Schanche, Gary W ; CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><description>Congress has directed that Department of Defense steam generating plants in the United States be converted to coal-burning facilities to reduce the dependence on petroleum fuels. To help meet this requirement, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assessed coal water fuel (CWF) which has the potential to be an efficient, inexpensive, and reliable replacement for petroleum fuels. However, the actual costs of producing and burning CWF are not yet known. Researcher (1) developed a cost model for CWF, (2) assessed the engineering and economic requirements of converting a boiler to burn CWF, and (3) designed a complete firing system based on a specification for CWF developed to ensure that the fuel will work in converted boiler. This study indicated that a CWF retrofit is technically feasible and will soon become economically attractive. CWF can cost as little as $2.61 per million British thermal units (MBtu) and an industrial sized oil-designed boiler can be retrofitted to burn CWF for approximately $1.9 million. CWF should be demonstrated in a long-term test program to determine equipment specifications, operational characteristics, systems control requirements, and maintenance needs.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ARMY FACILITIES ; AST45 ; BURNING RATE ; COAL ; COAL WATER FUEL ; ECONOMICS ; Fuels ; HEAT OF COMBUSTION ; NATURAL GAS ; OIL BURNERS ; PE62781A ; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ; WU006</subject><creationdate>1991</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA240021$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ask, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsock, Donald K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jill E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanche, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><title>The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants</title><description>Congress has directed that Department of Defense steam generating plants in the United States be converted to coal-burning facilities to reduce the dependence on petroleum fuels. To help meet this requirement, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assessed coal water fuel (CWF) which has the potential to be an efficient, inexpensive, and reliable replacement for petroleum fuels. However, the actual costs of producing and burning CWF are not yet known. Researcher (1) developed a cost model for CWF, (2) assessed the engineering and economic requirements of converting a boiler to burn CWF, and (3) designed a complete firing system based on a specification for CWF developed to ensure that the fuel will work in converted boiler. This study indicated that a CWF retrofit is technically feasible and will soon become economically attractive. CWF can cost as little as $2.61 per million British thermal units (MBtu) and an industrial sized oil-designed boiler can be retrofitted to burn CWF for approximately $1.9 million. CWF should be demonstrated in a long-term test program to determine equipment specifications, operational characteristics, systems control requirements, and maintenance needs.</description><subject>ARMY FACILITIES</subject><subject>AST45</subject><subject>BURNING RATE</subject><subject>COAL</subject><subject>COAL WATER FUEL</subject><subject>ECONOMICS</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>HEAT OF COMBUSTION</subject><subject>NATURAL GAS</subject><subject>OIL BURNERS</subject><subject>PE62781A</subject><subject>PETROLEUM PRODUCTS</subject><subject>WU006</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHAJyUhVcE3Oz8vPzUwuVkjMS1FwLCjIyUxOLMnMz1PIT1Nwzk_MUQhPLEktUnArTc1RyMxTcCzKrVTwSE0sUQjIScwrKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6ORiYGBkaGxgSkARCTLkg</recordid><startdate>199108</startdate><enddate>199108</enddate><creator>Ask, Thomas E</creator><creator>Hartsock, Donald K</creator><creator>Davidson, Jill E</creator><creator>Schanche, Gary W</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199108</creationdate><title>The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants</title><author>Ask, Thomas E ; Hartsock, Donald K ; Davidson, Jill E ; Schanche, Gary W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2400213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>ARMY FACILITIES</topic><topic>AST45</topic><topic>BURNING RATE</topic><topic>COAL</topic><topic>COAL WATER FUEL</topic><topic>ECONOMICS</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>HEAT OF COMBUSTION</topic><topic>NATURAL GAS</topic><topic>OIL BURNERS</topic><topic>PE62781A</topic><topic>PETROLEUM PRODUCTS</topic><topic>WU006</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ask, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartsock, Donald K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Jill E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanche, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ask, Thomas E</au><au>Hartsock, Donald K</au><au>Davidson, Jill E</au><au>Schanche, Gary W</au><aucorp>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants</btitle><date>1991-08</date><risdate>1991</risdate><abstract>Congress has directed that Department of Defense steam generating plants in the United States be converted to coal-burning facilities to reduce the dependence on petroleum fuels. To help meet this requirement, the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory assessed coal water fuel (CWF) which has the potential to be an efficient, inexpensive, and reliable replacement for petroleum fuels. However, the actual costs of producing and burning CWF are not yet known. Researcher (1) developed a cost model for CWF, (2) assessed the engineering and economic requirements of converting a boiler to burn CWF, and (3) designed a complete firing system based on a specification for CWF developed to ensure that the fuel will work in converted boiler. This study indicated that a CWF retrofit is technically feasible and will soon become economically attractive. CWF can cost as little as $2.61 per million British thermal units (MBtu) and an industrial sized oil-designed boiler can be retrofitted to burn CWF for approximately $1.9 million. CWF should be demonstrated in a long-term test program to determine equipment specifications, operational characteristics, systems control requirements, and maintenance needs.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA240021
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ARMY FACILITIES
AST45
BURNING RATE
COAL
COAL WATER FUEL
ECONOMICS
Fuels
HEAT OF COMBUSTION
NATURAL GAS
OIL BURNERS
PE62781A
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
WU006
title The Economics and Application of Coal Water Fuel in Army Heat Plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The%20Economics%20and%20Application%20of%20Coal%20Water%20Fuel%20in%20Army%20Heat%20Plants&rft.au=Ask,%20Thomas%20E&rft.aucorp=CONSTRUCTION%20ENGINEERING%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20(ARMY)%20CHAMPAIGN%20IL&rft.date=1991-08&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA240021%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true