Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights

At present the U.S. Coast Guard employs a two-station or parallax range method for indicating to a vessel's operator the correct path to follow while proceeding along certain navigation channels. Vertical alignment of two lights, one more distant than the other, indicates that hte vessel is pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Laxar, Kevin, Mandler, Marc B
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Laxar, Kevin
Mandler, Marc B
description At present the U.S. Coast Guard employs a two-station or parallax range method for indicating to a vessel's operator the correct path to follow while proceeding along certain navigation channels. Vertical alignment of two lights, one more distant than the other, indicates that hte vessel is positioned on the range axis, and any deviation from this course is readily apparent. To compare the sensitivity of various methods for range displays, including presumably less expensive single-station ranges, the performance of observers on four parallax range configurations was assessed psychophysically by measuring the observers' ability to determine lateral position in channel and direction of motion across a channel. The currently used two-point fixed range light configuration was found to afford a high degree of sensitivity in determining lateral position and motion. With a two-point flashing range, sensitivity is slightly decreased and errors in judging direction of motion are significantly higher than with the fixed range lights. Two alternatives parallax range light configurations afforded a slight potential improvement in sensitivity over the two-point fixed range lights. Strong evidence was found that training or experience could improve performance regardless of range light configuration. Judgements of motion toward the range axis were significantly more sensitive than judgments of motion away. These findings describe the sensitivity afforded by present parallax ranges and will allow comparison of proposed single-station ranges with present configurations to evaluate their adequacy as navigational aids.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA225935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA225935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2259353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDDySyzLTE8syczPUwhILUrLL8pNzEtOVQgtzsxLVwhILErMyUmsUAhKzEtPVfDJTM8oKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6ORkamlsamxgSkAQQqKP4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Laxar, Kevin ; Mandler, Marc B</creator><creatorcontrib>Laxar, Kevin ; Mandler, Marc B ; NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><description>At present the U.S. Coast Guard employs a two-station or parallax range method for indicating to a vessel's operator the correct path to follow while proceeding along certain navigation channels. Vertical alignment of two lights, one more distant than the other, indicates that hte vessel is positioned on the range axis, and any deviation from this course is readily apparent. To compare the sensitivity of various methods for range displays, including presumably less expensive single-station ranges, the performance of observers on four parallax range configurations was assessed psychophysically by measuring the observers' ability to determine lateral position in channel and direction of motion across a channel. The currently used two-point fixed range light configuration was found to afford a high degree of sensitivity in determining lateral position and motion. With a two-point flashing range, sensitivity is slightly decreased and errors in judging direction of motion are significantly higher than with the fixed range lights. Two alternatives parallax range light configurations afforded a slight potential improvement in sensitivity over the two-point fixed range lights. Strong evidence was found that training or experience could improve performance regardless of range light configuration. Judgements of motion toward the range axis were significantly more sensitive than judgments of motion away. These findings describe the sensitivity afforded by present parallax ranges and will allow comparison of proposed single-station ranges with present configurations to evaluate their adequacy as navigational aids.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ALIGNMENT ; CHANNELS(WATERWAYS) ; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION ; COURSE INDICATORS ; DISCRIMINATION ; DISPLAY SYSTEMS ; ERRORS ; FLASHES ; LATERAL SENSITIVITY ; LEADING LIGHTS ; MOTION ; Navigation and Guidance ; NAVIGATIONAL AIDS ; NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELS ; NAVIGATIONAL LIGHTS ; OBSERVERS ; PARALLAX RANGE LIGHTS ; PERFORMANCE(HUMAN) ; Psychology ; PSYCHOPHYSICS ; RANGE LIGHTS ; SENSITIVITY ; SURFACE NAVIGATION ; VERNIER ACUITY ; VISUAL ACUITY</subject><creationdate>1990</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA225935$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laxar, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandler, Marc B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><title>Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights</title><description>At present the U.S. Coast Guard employs a two-station or parallax range method for indicating to a vessel's operator the correct path to follow while proceeding along certain navigation channels. Vertical alignment of two lights, one more distant than the other, indicates that hte vessel is positioned on the range axis, and any deviation from this course is readily apparent. To compare the sensitivity of various methods for range displays, including presumably less expensive single-station ranges, the performance of observers on four parallax range configurations was assessed psychophysically by measuring the observers' ability to determine lateral position in channel and direction of motion across a channel. The currently used two-point fixed range light configuration was found to afford a high degree of sensitivity in determining lateral position and motion. With a two-point flashing range, sensitivity is slightly decreased and errors in judging direction of motion are significantly higher than with the fixed range lights. Two alternatives parallax range light configurations afforded a slight potential improvement in sensitivity over the two-point fixed range lights. Strong evidence was found that training or experience could improve performance regardless of range light configuration. Judgements of motion toward the range axis were significantly more sensitive than judgments of motion away. These findings describe the sensitivity afforded by present parallax ranges and will allow comparison of proposed single-station ranges with present configurations to evaluate their adequacy as navigational aids.</description><subject>ALIGNMENT</subject><subject>CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</subject><subject>COURSE INDICATORS</subject><subject>DISCRIMINATION</subject><subject>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</subject><subject>ERRORS</subject><subject>FLASHES</subject><subject>LATERAL SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>LEADING LIGHTS</subject><subject>MOTION</subject><subject>Navigation and Guidance</subject><subject>NAVIGATIONAL AIDS</subject><subject>NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELS</subject><subject>NAVIGATIONAL LIGHTS</subject><subject>OBSERVERS</subject><subject>PARALLAX RANGE LIGHTS</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>PSYCHOPHYSICS</subject><subject>RANGE LIGHTS</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>SURFACE NAVIGATION</subject><subject>VERNIER ACUITY</subject><subject>VISUAL ACUITY</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDDySyzLTE8syczPUwhILUrLL8pNzEtOVQgtzsxLVwhILErMyUmsUAhKzEtPVfDJTM8oKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66KSWZyfHFJZl5qSXxji6ORkamlsamxgSkAQQqKP4</recordid><startdate>199001</startdate><enddate>199001</enddate><creator>Laxar, Kevin</creator><creator>Mandler, Marc B</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199001</creationdate><title>Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights</title><author>Laxar, Kevin ; Mandler, Marc B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2259353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>ALIGNMENT</topic><topic>CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION</topic><topic>COURSE INDICATORS</topic><topic>DISCRIMINATION</topic><topic>DISPLAY SYSTEMS</topic><topic>ERRORS</topic><topic>FLASHES</topic><topic>LATERAL SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>LEADING LIGHTS</topic><topic>MOTION</topic><topic>Navigation and Guidance</topic><topic>NAVIGATIONAL AIDS</topic><topic>NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELS</topic><topic>NAVIGATIONAL LIGHTS</topic><topic>OBSERVERS</topic><topic>PARALLAX RANGE LIGHTS</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>PSYCHOPHYSICS</topic><topic>RANGE LIGHTS</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>SURFACE NAVIGATION</topic><topic>VERNIER ACUITY</topic><topic>VISUAL ACUITY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laxar, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandler, Marc B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laxar, Kevin</au><au>Mandler, Marc B</au><aucorp>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights</btitle><date>1990-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><abstract>At present the U.S. Coast Guard employs a two-station or parallax range method for indicating to a vessel's operator the correct path to follow while proceeding along certain navigation channels. Vertical alignment of two lights, one more distant than the other, indicates that hte vessel is positioned on the range axis, and any deviation from this course is readily apparent. To compare the sensitivity of various methods for range displays, including presumably less expensive single-station ranges, the performance of observers on four parallax range configurations was assessed psychophysically by measuring the observers' ability to determine lateral position in channel and direction of motion across a channel. The currently used two-point fixed range light configuration was found to afford a high degree of sensitivity in determining lateral position and motion. With a two-point flashing range, sensitivity is slightly decreased and errors in judging direction of motion are significantly higher than with the fixed range lights. Two alternatives parallax range light configurations afforded a slight potential improvement in sensitivity over the two-point fixed range lights. Strong evidence was found that training or experience could improve performance regardless of range light configuration. Judgements of motion toward the range axis were significantly more sensitive than judgments of motion away. These findings describe the sensitivity afforded by present parallax ranges and will allow comparison of proposed single-station ranges with present configurations to evaluate their adequacy as navigational aids.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA225935
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ALIGNMENT
CHANNELS(WATERWAYS)
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION
COURSE INDICATORS
DISCRIMINATION
DISPLAY SYSTEMS
ERRORS
FLASHES
LATERAL SENSITIVITY
LEADING LIGHTS
MOTION
Navigation and Guidance
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
NAVIGATIONAL CHANNELS
NAVIGATIONAL LIGHTS
OBSERVERS
PARALLAX RANGE LIGHTS
PERFORMANCE(HUMAN)
Psychology
PSYCHOPHYSICS
RANGE LIGHTS
SENSITIVITY
SURFACE NAVIGATION
VERNIER ACUITY
VISUAL ACUITY
title Navigation Performance Using Parallax Range Lights
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Navigation%20Performance%20Using%20Parallax%20Range%20Lights&rft.au=Laxar,%20Kevin&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20SUBMARINE%20MEDICAL%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20GROTON%20CT&rft.date=1990-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA225935%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true