Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs

The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) has conducted an investigation into the development of an optimal strategy for selecting and prioritizing energy research and development (R&D) projects. This work is part of an ongoing effort to ensure that USACERL's R&am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Windingland, Larry M, Teagan, Peter, Frantzis, Lisa
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Windingland, Larry M
Teagan, Peter
Frantzis, Lisa
description The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) has conducted an investigation into the development of an optimal strategy for selecting and prioritizing energy research and development (R&D) projects. This work is part of an ongoing effort to ensure that USACERL's R&D program includes an appropriate combination of new technologies for both short and longer term return on investment. The R&D goal is to provide the Army with most effective equipment and processes for conserving energy. Energy R&D work being conducted by various Governmental and private firms was reviewed and the methodologies for selection and prioritization of projects were analyzed. The processes require making judgments on key issues such as: probability of achieving performance goals; probable cost structures; commercial interest; status of competing technologies; and potential application of the technology. The existing approach taken at USACERL was compared with project selection methods of other Government and private organizations. Recommendations were developed for improving the selection criteria and methodology at USACERL.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA205051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA205051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2050513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFizEKwkAQRdNYiHoDi72AEJUcICQRG0E0fVg2k92BzUyYHQQ9vUHtrT689_4y8y24QBzZP80dIjhFJlMJKghaY6k3F9DA_TcZWMxVkGePLyRvGgKZ-Q0SWHHhc6jhAZGnEUjnmL3YMa2zxWBjgs1vV9n21LTVedcrui4pEmhX1uUhL_Jif_yj32jyPWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Windingland, Larry M ; Teagan, Peter ; Frantzis, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Windingland, Larry M ; Teagan, Peter ; Frantzis, Lisa ; CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) has conducted an investigation into the development of an optimal strategy for selecting and prioritizing energy research and development (R&amp;D) projects. This work is part of an ongoing effort to ensure that USACERL's R&amp;D program includes an appropriate combination of new technologies for both short and longer term return on investment. The R&amp;D goal is to provide the Army with most effective equipment and processes for conserving energy. Energy R&amp;D work being conducted by various Governmental and private firms was reviewed and the methodologies for selection and prioritization of projects were analyzed. The processes require making judgments on key issues such as: probability of achieving performance goals; probable cost structures; commercial interest; status of competing technologies; and potential application of the technology. The existing approach taken at USACERL was compared with project selection methods of other Government and private organizations. Recommendations were developed for improving the selection criteria and methodology at USACERL.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Administration and Management ; AST45 ; COSTS ; ENERGY ; OPTIMIZATION ; PE62781A ; PROBABILITY ; RESEARCH MANAGEMENT ; SELECTION ; STRATEGY ; STRUCTURES ; WU016</subject><creationdate>1989</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,777,882,27549,27550</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA205051$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Windingland, Larry M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teagan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantzis, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><title>Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs</title><description>The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) has conducted an investigation into the development of an optimal strategy for selecting and prioritizing energy research and development (R&amp;D) projects. This work is part of an ongoing effort to ensure that USACERL's R&amp;D program includes an appropriate combination of new technologies for both short and longer term return on investment. The R&amp;D goal is to provide the Army with most effective equipment and processes for conserving energy. Energy R&amp;D work being conducted by various Governmental and private firms was reviewed and the methodologies for selection and prioritization of projects were analyzed. The processes require making judgments on key issues such as: probability of achieving performance goals; probable cost structures; commercial interest; status of competing technologies; and potential application of the technology. The existing approach taken at USACERL was compared with project selection methods of other Government and private organizations. Recommendations were developed for improving the selection criteria and methodology at USACERL.</description><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>AST45</subject><subject>COSTS</subject><subject>ENERGY</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>PE62781A</subject><subject>PROBABILITY</subject><subject>RESEARCH MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>SELECTION</subject><subject>STRATEGY</subject><subject>STRUCTURES</subject><subject>WU016</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFizEKwkAQRdNYiHoDi72AEJUcICQRG0E0fVg2k92BzUyYHQQ9vUHtrT689_4y8y24QBzZP80dIjhFJlMJKghaY6k3F9DA_TcZWMxVkGePLyRvGgKZ-Q0SWHHhc6jhAZGnEUjnmL3YMa2zxWBjgs1vV9n21LTVedcrui4pEmhX1uUhL_Jif_yj32jyPWA</recordid><startdate>198901</startdate><enddate>198901</enddate><creator>Windingland, Larry M</creator><creator>Teagan, Peter</creator><creator>Frantzis, Lisa</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198901</creationdate><title>Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs</title><author>Windingland, Larry M ; Teagan, Peter ; Frantzis, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA2050513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>AST45</topic><topic>COSTS</topic><topic>ENERGY</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>PE62781A</topic><topic>PROBABILITY</topic><topic>RESEARCH MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>SELECTION</topic><topic>STRATEGY</topic><topic>STRUCTURES</topic><topic>WU016</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Windingland, Larry M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teagan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frantzis, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Windingland, Larry M</au><au>Teagan, Peter</au><au>Frantzis, Lisa</au><aucorp>CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LAB (ARMY) CHAMPAIGN IL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs</btitle><date>1989-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><abstract>The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) has conducted an investigation into the development of an optimal strategy for selecting and prioritizing energy research and development (R&amp;D) projects. This work is part of an ongoing effort to ensure that USACERL's R&amp;D program includes an appropriate combination of new technologies for both short and longer term return on investment. The R&amp;D goal is to provide the Army with most effective equipment and processes for conserving energy. Energy R&amp;D work being conducted by various Governmental and private firms was reviewed and the methodologies for selection and prioritization of projects were analyzed. The processes require making judgments on key issues such as: probability of achieving performance goals; probable cost structures; commercial interest; status of competing technologies; and potential application of the technology. The existing approach taken at USACERL was compared with project selection methods of other Government and private organizations. Recommendations were developed for improving the selection criteria and methodology at USACERL.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA205051
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects Administration and Management
AST45
COSTS
ENERGY
OPTIMIZATION
PE62781A
PROBABILITY
RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
SELECTION
STRATEGY
STRUCTURES
WU016
title Technology Selection Criteria and Methodology for Prioritizing Energy Research and Development Programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A31%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Technology%20Selection%20Criteria%20and%20Methodology%20for%20Prioritizing%20Energy%20Research%20and%20Development%20Programs&rft.au=Windingland,%20Larry%20M&rft.aucorp=CONSTRUCTION%20ENGINEERING%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20(ARMY)%20CHAMPAIGN%20IL&rft.date=1989-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA205051%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true