Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization
An analysis of two aspects of the Marine Corps' expeditionary airfield concept--logistic support and airfield survival suggests that existing procedures are extremely vulnerable vis-a-vis the modern threat. Threat capability is steadily growing as a result of the development of accurate, long r...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Hatch,James E |
description | An analysis of two aspects of the Marine Corps' expeditionary airfield concept--logistic support and airfield survival suggests that existing procedures are extremely vulnerable vis-a-vis the modern threat. Threat capability is steadily growing as a result of the development of accurate, long range, stand-off delivery systems, capable of inflicting severe damage to expeditionary facilities. Existing methods of establishing airfields ashore are based on operational concepts developed in the Pacific during World War II, when air supremacy was, in most cases, the norm. Refinement of the concept, subsequent to the conclusion of World War II, has not reflected a modification of the basis assumption of air supremacy. Tactical aviation, an essential ingredient in support of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) ashore, may be, in the final analysis, dependent of the support and survival of the expeditionary airfield. An option that alleviates existing logistical shortfalls is addressed. Survival shortfalls are identified for future resolution. (Author) |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA180154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA180154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1801543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLB0rShITcksyczPSyyqVHDMLErLTM1JUXDOz0tOLShR0FVwVHBOzMlRSMsvUvDNT0ktysusSgQp52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6GFgaGpibGBKQBI_QrBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Hatch,James E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatch,James E ; ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><description>An analysis of two aspects of the Marine Corps' expeditionary airfield concept--logistic support and airfield survival suggests that existing procedures are extremely vulnerable vis-a-vis the modern threat. Threat capability is steadily growing as a result of the development of accurate, long range, stand-off delivery systems, capable of inflicting severe damage to expeditionary facilities. Existing methods of establishing airfields ashore are based on operational concepts developed in the Pacific during World War II, when air supremacy was, in most cases, the norm. Refinement of the concept, subsequent to the conclusion of World War II, has not reflected a modification of the basis assumption of air supremacy. Tactical aviation, an essential ingredient in support of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) ashore, may be, in the final analysis, dependent of the support and survival of the expeditionary airfield. An option that alleviates existing logistical shortfalls is addressed. Survival shortfalls are identified for future resolution. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>AERIAL WARFARE ; AIR TO SURFACE ; DAMAGE ; DELIVERY ; FACILITIES ; LANDING FIELDS ; LOGISTICS SUPPORT ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; LONG RANGE(DISTANCE) ; LONG RANGE(TIME) ; MARINE CORPS ; Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics ; STANDOFF ; SURVIVABILITY ; SURVIVAL(GENERAL) ; TACTICAL AIRCRAFT ; TASK FORCES ; Terminal Flight Facilities ; THREATS ; VULNERABILITY ; WARFARE</subject><creationdate>1987</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA180154$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatch,James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><title>Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization</title><description>An analysis of two aspects of the Marine Corps' expeditionary airfield concept--logistic support and airfield survival suggests that existing procedures are extremely vulnerable vis-a-vis the modern threat. Threat capability is steadily growing as a result of the development of accurate, long range, stand-off delivery systems, capable of inflicting severe damage to expeditionary facilities. Existing methods of establishing airfields ashore are based on operational concepts developed in the Pacific during World War II, when air supremacy was, in most cases, the norm. Refinement of the concept, subsequent to the conclusion of World War II, has not reflected a modification of the basis assumption of air supremacy. Tactical aviation, an essential ingredient in support of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) ashore, may be, in the final analysis, dependent of the support and survival of the expeditionary airfield. An option that alleviates existing logistical shortfalls is addressed. Survival shortfalls are identified for future resolution. (Author)</description><subject>AERIAL WARFARE</subject><subject>AIR TO SURFACE</subject><subject>DAMAGE</subject><subject>DELIVERY</subject><subject>FACILITIES</subject><subject>LANDING FIELDS</subject><subject>LOGISTICS SUPPORT</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>LONG RANGE(DISTANCE)</subject><subject>LONG RANGE(TIME)</subject><subject>MARINE CORPS</subject><subject>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</subject><subject>STANDOFF</subject><subject>SURVIVABILITY</subject><subject>SURVIVAL(GENERAL)</subject><subject>TACTICAL AIRCRAFT</subject><subject>TASK FORCES</subject><subject>Terminal Flight Facilities</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>VULNERABILITY</subject><subject>WARFARE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLB0rShITcksyczPSyyqVHDMLErLTM1JUXDOz0tOLShR0FVwVHBOzMlRSMsvUvDNT0ktysusSgQp52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6GFgaGpibGBKQBI_QrBw</recordid><startdate>19870323</startdate><enddate>19870323</enddate><creator>Hatch,James E</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870323</creationdate><title>Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization</title><author>Hatch,James E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1801543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>AERIAL WARFARE</topic><topic>AIR TO SURFACE</topic><topic>DAMAGE</topic><topic>DELIVERY</topic><topic>FACILITIES</topic><topic>LANDING FIELDS</topic><topic>LOGISTICS SUPPORT</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>LONG RANGE(DISTANCE)</topic><topic>LONG RANGE(TIME)</topic><topic>MARINE CORPS</topic><topic>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</topic><topic>STANDOFF</topic><topic>SURVIVABILITY</topic><topic>SURVIVAL(GENERAL)</topic><topic>TACTICAL AIRCRAFT</topic><topic>TASK FORCES</topic><topic>Terminal Flight Facilities</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>VULNERABILITY</topic><topic>WARFARE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatch,James E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch,James E</au><aucorp>ARMY WAR COLL CARLISLE BARRACKS PA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization</btitle><date>1987-03-23</date><risdate>1987</risdate><abstract>An analysis of two aspects of the Marine Corps' expeditionary airfield concept--logistic support and airfield survival suggests that existing procedures are extremely vulnerable vis-a-vis the modern threat. Threat capability is steadily growing as a result of the development of accurate, long range, stand-off delivery systems, capable of inflicting severe damage to expeditionary facilities. Existing methods of establishing airfields ashore are based on operational concepts developed in the Pacific during World War II, when air supremacy was, in most cases, the norm. Refinement of the concept, subsequent to the conclusion of World War II, has not reflected a modification of the basis assumption of air supremacy. Tactical aviation, an essential ingredient in support of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) ashore, may be, in the final analysis, dependent of the support and survival of the expeditionary airfield. An option that alleviates existing logistical shortfalls is addressed. Survival shortfalls are identified for future resolution. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA180154 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | AERIAL WARFARE AIR TO SURFACE DAMAGE DELIVERY FACILITIES LANDING FIELDS LOGISTICS SUPPORT Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies LONG RANGE(DISTANCE) LONG RANGE(TIME) MARINE CORPS Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics STANDOFF SURVIVABILITY SURVIVAL(GENERAL) TACTICAL AIRCRAFT TASK FORCES Terminal Flight Facilities THREATS VULNERABILITY WARFARE |
title | Expeditionary Airfield Concept - A Call for Modernization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Expeditionary%20Airfield%20Concept%20-%20A%20Call%20for%20Modernization&rft.au=Hatch,James%20E&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20WAR%20COLL%20CARLISLE%20BARRACKS%20PA&rft.date=1987-03-23&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA180154%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |