Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis
This research was prompted by the need to select a suitable headset for auditory processing of passive-sonar information. The selection of an accurate transducer for auditory processing of passive sonar signals requires accurate measurement of frequency response. No standard for such measurement exi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Russotti, J S Santoro, T Haskell, G B Neal, R |
description | This research was prompted by the need to select a suitable headset for auditory processing of passive-sonar information. The selection of an accurate transducer for auditory processing of passive sonar signals requires accurate measurement of frequency response. No standard for such measurement exists. The method proposed here uses a modified Zwislocki acoustic coupler mounted in an anthropometrically and acoustically average mannikin, KEMAR, in order to simulate the acoustic load that an average human ear would place on the earphone element. A computerized signal-collection and -analysis system subtracted this transfer function from stored earphone-response data. Responses were averaged across samples of left and right earphone elements and across repeated measurements that sampled variability due to headset placement, seal around the ear, and headband tension. Analog plots of earphone frequency response were indistinguishable from computer regenerated plots of that same frequency response. Comparison of raw data and corrected data show the correction procedure to be within 0.2 dB of perfect accuracy. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA160054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA160054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1600543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAKKMovyC9OTVEIKUrMK05LLdJ1K81LLsnMz1MISU3OyMssLE1VSMsvUnBNLCrIyM9LVXDMS8ypLM4s5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6GZgYGpibGBKQBtGosRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Russotti, J S ; Santoro, T ; Haskell, G B ; Neal, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Russotti, J S ; Santoro, T ; Haskell, G B ; Neal, R ; NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><description>This research was prompted by the need to select a suitable headset for auditory processing of passive-sonar information. The selection of an accurate transducer for auditory processing of passive sonar signals requires accurate measurement of frequency response. No standard for such measurement exists. The method proposed here uses a modified Zwislocki acoustic coupler mounted in an anthropometrically and acoustically average mannikin, KEMAR, in order to simulate the acoustic load that an average human ear would place on the earphone element. A computerized signal-collection and -analysis system subtracted this transfer function from stored earphone-response data. Responses were averaged across samples of left and right earphone elements and across repeated measurements that sampled variability due to headset placement, seal around the ear, and headband tension. Analog plots of earphone frequency response were indistinguishable from computer regenerated plots of that same frequency response. Comparison of raw data and corrected data show the correction procedure to be within 0.2 dB of perfect accuracy.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACCURACY ; Acoustic Detection and Detectors ; ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT ; ACOUSTICS ; ANALOG SYSTEMS ; AUDITORY SIGNALS ; CORRECTIONS ; COUPLERS ; EAR ; EARPHONES ; FREQUENCY RESPONSE ; HUMANS ; MEASUREMENT ; PASSIVE SONAR ; PE64117N ; PLOTTING ; SIGNAL PROCESSING ; SONAR SIGNALS ; TRANSDUCERS ; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS ; WU0006</subject><creationdate>1985</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27545,27546</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA160054$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Russotti, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskell, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><title>Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis</title><description>This research was prompted by the need to select a suitable headset for auditory processing of passive-sonar information. The selection of an accurate transducer for auditory processing of passive sonar signals requires accurate measurement of frequency response. No standard for such measurement exists. The method proposed here uses a modified Zwislocki acoustic coupler mounted in an anthropometrically and acoustically average mannikin, KEMAR, in order to simulate the acoustic load that an average human ear would place on the earphone element. A computerized signal-collection and -analysis system subtracted this transfer function from stored earphone-response data. Responses were averaged across samples of left and right earphone elements and across repeated measurements that sampled variability due to headset placement, seal around the ear, and headband tension. Analog plots of earphone frequency response were indistinguishable from computer regenerated plots of that same frequency response. Comparison of raw data and corrected data show the correction procedure to be within 0.2 dB of perfect accuracy.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>Acoustic Detection and Detectors</subject><subject>ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT</subject><subject>ACOUSTICS</subject><subject>ANALOG SYSTEMS</subject><subject>AUDITORY SIGNALS</subject><subject>CORRECTIONS</subject><subject>COUPLERS</subject><subject>EAR</subject><subject>EARPHONES</subject><subject>FREQUENCY RESPONSE</subject><subject>HUMANS</subject><subject>MEASUREMENT</subject><subject>PASSIVE SONAR</subject><subject>PE64117N</subject><subject>PLOTTING</subject><subject>SIGNAL PROCESSING</subject><subject>SONAR SIGNALS</subject><subject>TRANSDUCERS</subject><subject>TRANSFER FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>WU0006</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAKKMovyC9OTVEIKUrMK05LLdJ1K81LLsnMz1MISU3OyMssLE1VSMsvUnBNLCrIyM9LVXDMS8ypLM4s5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6GZgYGpibGBKQBtGosRA</recordid><startdate>19850620</startdate><enddate>19850620</enddate><creator>Russotti, J S</creator><creator>Santoro, T</creator><creator>Haskell, G B</creator><creator>Neal, R</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850620</creationdate><title>Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis</title><author>Russotti, J S ; Santoro, T ; Haskell, G B ; Neal, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1600543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>Acoustic Detection and Detectors</topic><topic>ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT</topic><topic>ACOUSTICS</topic><topic>ANALOG SYSTEMS</topic><topic>AUDITORY SIGNALS</topic><topic>CORRECTIONS</topic><topic>COUPLERS</topic><topic>EAR</topic><topic>EARPHONES</topic><topic>FREQUENCY RESPONSE</topic><topic>HUMANS</topic><topic>MEASUREMENT</topic><topic>PASSIVE SONAR</topic><topic>PE64117N</topic><topic>PLOTTING</topic><topic>SIGNAL PROCESSING</topic><topic>SONAR SIGNALS</topic><topic>TRANSDUCERS</topic><topic>TRANSFER FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>WU0006</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Russotti, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskell, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Russotti, J S</au><au>Santoro, T</au><au>Haskell, G B</au><au>Neal, R</au><aucorp>NAVAL SUBMARINE MEDICAL RESEARCH LAB GROTON CT</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis</btitle><date>1985-06-20</date><risdate>1985</risdate><abstract>This research was prompted by the need to select a suitable headset for auditory processing of passive-sonar information. The selection of an accurate transducer for auditory processing of passive sonar signals requires accurate measurement of frequency response. No standard for such measurement exists. The method proposed here uses a modified Zwislocki acoustic coupler mounted in an anthropometrically and acoustically average mannikin, KEMAR, in order to simulate the acoustic load that an average human ear would place on the earphone element. A computerized signal-collection and -analysis system subtracted this transfer function from stored earphone-response data. Responses were averaged across samples of left and right earphone elements and across repeated measurements that sampled variability due to headset placement, seal around the ear, and headband tension. Analog plots of earphone frequency response were indistinguishable from computer regenerated plots of that same frequency response. Comparison of raw data and corrected data show the correction procedure to be within 0.2 dB of perfect accuracy.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA160054 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | ACCURACY Acoustic Detection and Detectors ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT ACOUSTICS ANALOG SYSTEMS AUDITORY SIGNALS CORRECTIONS COUPLERS EAR EARPHONES FREQUENCY RESPONSE HUMANS MEASUREMENT PASSIVE SONAR PE64117N PLOTTING SIGNAL PROCESSING SONAR SIGNALS TRANSDUCERS TRANSFER FUNCTIONS WU0006 |
title | Proposed Transfer-Function Technique for Earphone Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Proposed%20Transfer-Function%20Technique%20for%20Earphone%20Analysis&rft.au=Russotti,%20J%20S&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20SUBMARINE%20MEDICAL%20RESEARCH%20LAB%20GROTON%20CT&rft.date=1985-06-20&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA160054%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |