The Airlift Dilemma: An Update

The US, in order to protect its security, must be able to support its forces currently forward deployed as well as projecting other military forces into regions of the world where they do not exist. Time has become a critical factor because of the rapid mobility of modern armed forces and especially...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Bullard, Edward M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Bullard, Edward M
description The US, in order to protect its security, must be able to support its forces currently forward deployed as well as projecting other military forces into regions of the world where they do not exist. Time has become a critical factor because of the rapid mobility of modern armed forces and especially for the US because of its geographic isolation from much of the world. Transport by air becomes the only available method of movement during the early stages of conflict. In order to satisfy that requirement, an airlift force structure must be capable of not only meeting the time constraints, but be capable of carrying a combat unit from its origin to its employment area. The current airlift force does not have this capability. After examining doctrinal and strategic principles, this report recommends a force structure which responds to our national military strategy. First, it recommends modernization of the tactical airlift force through purchase of newer model C-130 aircraft from a production line which is still open. Second, it recommends the purchase of a long-range C- 17 type aircraft which, through its method of direct delivery, can avoid the traditional hub and spoke transportation system and save precious reaction time. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA159307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA159307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1593073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZJALyUhVcMwsyslMK1FwycxJzc1NtFJwzFMILUhJLEnlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujoamlsYG5sYEpAExFSCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>The Airlift Dilemma: An Update</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Bullard, Edward M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bullard, Edward M ; AIR WAR COLL MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><description>The US, in order to protect its security, must be able to support its forces currently forward deployed as well as projecting other military forces into regions of the world where they do not exist. Time has become a critical factor because of the rapid mobility of modern armed forces and especially for the US because of its geographic isolation from much of the world. Transport by air becomes the only available method of movement during the early stages of conflict. In order to satisfy that requirement, an airlift force structure must be capable of not only meeting the time constraints, but be capable of carrying a combat unit from its origin to its employment area. The current airlift force does not have this capability. After examining doctrinal and strategic principles, this report recommends a force structure which responds to our national military strategy. First, it recommends modernization of the tactical airlift force through purchase of newer model C-130 aircraft from a production line which is still open. Second, it recommends the purchase of a long-range C- 17 type aircraft which, through its method of direct delivery, can avoid the traditional hub and spoke transportation system and save precious reaction time. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ; COMBAT SUPPORT ; CONFLICT ; DELIVERY ; FORWARD AREAS ; GLOBAL ; ISOLATION ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) ; Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics ; MILITARY STRATEGY ; MOBILITY ; NATIONAL SECURITY ; PRODUCTION ; QUICK REACTION ; RAPID DEPLOYMENT ; REACTION TIME ; REGIONS ; TACTICAL WARFARE ; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT ; TRANSPORTATION</subject><creationdate>1985</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA159307$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bullard, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR WAR COLL MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><title>The Airlift Dilemma: An Update</title><description>The US, in order to protect its security, must be able to support its forces currently forward deployed as well as projecting other military forces into regions of the world where they do not exist. Time has become a critical factor because of the rapid mobility of modern armed forces and especially for the US because of its geographic isolation from much of the world. Transport by air becomes the only available method of movement during the early stages of conflict. In order to satisfy that requirement, an airlift force structure must be capable of not only meeting the time constraints, but be capable of carrying a combat unit from its origin to its employment area. The current airlift force does not have this capability. After examining doctrinal and strategic principles, this report recommends a force structure which responds to our national military strategy. First, it recommends modernization of the tactical airlift force through purchase of newer model C-130 aircraft from a production line which is still open. Second, it recommends the purchase of a long-range C- 17 type aircraft which, through its method of direct delivery, can avoid the traditional hub and spoke transportation system and save precious reaction time. (Author)</description><subject>AIRLIFT OPERATIONS</subject><subject>COMBAT SUPPORT</subject><subject>CONFLICT</subject><subject>DELIVERY</subject><subject>FORWARD AREAS</subject><subject>GLOBAL</subject><subject>ISOLATION</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</subject><subject>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</subject><subject>MILITARY STRATEGY</subject><subject>MOBILITY</subject><subject>NATIONAL SECURITY</subject><subject>PRODUCTION</subject><subject>QUICK REACTION</subject><subject>RAPID DEPLOYMENT</subject><subject>REACTION TIME</subject><subject>REGIONS</subject><subject>TACTICAL WARFARE</subject><subject>TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT</subject><subject>TRANSPORTATION</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZJALyUhVcMwsyslMK1FwycxJzc1NtFJwzFMILUhJLEnlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujoamlsYG5sYEpAExFSCk</recordid><startdate>198505</startdate><enddate>198505</enddate><creator>Bullard, Edward M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198505</creationdate><title>The Airlift Dilemma: An Update</title><author>Bullard, Edward M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1593073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>AIRLIFT OPERATIONS</topic><topic>COMBAT SUPPORT</topic><topic>CONFLICT</topic><topic>DELIVERY</topic><topic>FORWARD AREAS</topic><topic>GLOBAL</topic><topic>ISOLATION</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)</topic><topic>Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics</topic><topic>MILITARY STRATEGY</topic><topic>MOBILITY</topic><topic>NATIONAL SECURITY</topic><topic>PRODUCTION</topic><topic>QUICK REACTION</topic><topic>RAPID DEPLOYMENT</topic><topic>REACTION TIME</topic><topic>REGIONS</topic><topic>TACTICAL WARFARE</topic><topic>TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT</topic><topic>TRANSPORTATION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bullard, Edward M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIR WAR COLL MAXWELL AFB AL</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bullard, Edward M</au><aucorp>AIR WAR COLL MAXWELL AFB AL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>The Airlift Dilemma: An Update</btitle><date>1985-05</date><risdate>1985</risdate><abstract>The US, in order to protect its security, must be able to support its forces currently forward deployed as well as projecting other military forces into regions of the world where they do not exist. Time has become a critical factor because of the rapid mobility of modern armed forces and especially for the US because of its geographic isolation from much of the world. Transport by air becomes the only available method of movement during the early stages of conflict. In order to satisfy that requirement, an airlift force structure must be capable of not only meeting the time constraints, but be capable of carrying a combat unit from its origin to its employment area. The current airlift force does not have this capability. After examining doctrinal and strategic principles, this report recommends a force structure which responds to our national military strategy. First, it recommends modernization of the tactical airlift force through purchase of newer model C-130 aircraft from a production line which is still open. Second, it recommends the purchase of a long-range C- 17 type aircraft which, through its method of direct delivery, can avoid the traditional hub and spoke transportation system and save precious reaction time. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA159307
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AIRLIFT OPERATIONS
COMBAT SUPPORT
CONFLICT
DELIVERY
FORWARD AREAS
GLOBAL
ISOLATION
Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies
MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES)
Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics
MILITARY STRATEGY
MOBILITY
NATIONAL SECURITY
PRODUCTION
QUICK REACTION
RAPID DEPLOYMENT
REACTION TIME
REGIONS
TACTICAL WARFARE
TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT
TRANSPORTATION
title The Airlift Dilemma: An Update
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A37%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=The%20Airlift%20Dilemma:%20An%20Update&rft.au=Bullard,%20Edward%20M&rft.aucorp=AIR%20WAR%20COLL%20MAXWELL%20AFB%20AL&rft.date=1985-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA159307%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true