Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads

A variety of procedures for predicting periodic bearing (shaft) loads and single-blade loads on propellers operating in circumferentially nonuniform flow are systematically evaluated. These procedures include the following: 1. a simple quasi-steady procedure that uses the open water characteristics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Boswell,R. J, Kim,K, Jessup,S. D, Lin,G
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Boswell,R. J
Kim,K
Jessup,S. D
Lin,G
description A variety of procedures for predicting periodic bearing (shaft) loads and single-blade loads on propellers operating in circumferentially nonuniform flow are systematically evaluated. These procedures include the following: 1. a simple quasi-steady procedure that uses the open water characteristics of the propeller; 2. a simple stripwise two-dimensional unsteady procedure; 3. an unsteady lifting line procedure; and 4. four different numerical procedures based on unsteady lifting surface theory. The ranges of applicability and limitations of the evaluated procedures are assessed. The assessments of applicability are based on comparisons with: 1. model experimental periodic bearing loads over systematic ranges of propeller parameter in idealized wake patterns; 2. model experimental single-blade loads in idealized wake patterns; and 3. model experimental single-blade loads simulating the effects of waves and ship motions. Tradeoffs between accuracy of predictions versus ease and simplicity of the computational procedures for practical applications are discussed. The results show that unsteady lifting surface procedures give the best prediction of periodic bearing loads over practical ranges of propeller parameters. However, quasi-steady and empirical methods are adequate for estimating single blade loads for most practical applications.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA135456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA135456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1354563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAMKEpMLslMTsxR8E0tychPKVZIyy9SCChKTckEiuelKwSkFmXmAzlAsfyC1Jyc1CIFn_zElGIeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhmwI0Lr4YqDe1JN7RxdHQ2NTE1MyYgDQAWqIrmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Boswell,R. J ; Kim,K ; Jessup,S. D ; Lin,G</creator><creatorcontrib>Boswell,R. J ; Kim,K ; Jessup,S. D ; Lin,G ; DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of procedures for predicting periodic bearing (shaft) loads and single-blade loads on propellers operating in circumferentially nonuniform flow are systematically evaluated. These procedures include the following: 1. a simple quasi-steady procedure that uses the open water characteristics of the propeller; 2. a simple stripwise two-dimensional unsteady procedure; 3. an unsteady lifting line procedure; and 4. four different numerical procedures based on unsteady lifting surface theory. The ranges of applicability and limitations of the evaluated procedures are assessed. The assessments of applicability are based on comparisons with: 1. model experimental periodic bearing loads over systematic ranges of propeller parameter in idealized wake patterns; 2. model experimental single-blade loads in idealized wake patterns; and 3. model experimental single-blade loads simulating the effects of waves and ship motions. Tradeoffs between accuracy of predictions versus ease and simplicity of the computational procedures for practical applications are discussed. The results show that unsteady lifting surface procedures give the best prediction of periodic bearing loads over practical ranges of propeller parameters. However, quasi-steady and empirical methods are adequate for estimating single blade loads for most practical applications.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Angle of attack ; Comparison ; Computations ; Fluid Mechanics ; Lift ; Loads(Forces) ; Marine Engineering ; Marine propellers ; Mathematical prediction ; Methodology ; Nonuniform flow ; Numerical Mathematics ; Propeller blades ; Ship motion</subject><creationdate>1983</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA135456$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boswell,R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim,K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessup,S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin,G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD</creatorcontrib><title>Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads</title><description>A variety of procedures for predicting periodic bearing (shaft) loads and single-blade loads on propellers operating in circumferentially nonuniform flow are systematically evaluated. These procedures include the following: 1. a simple quasi-steady procedure that uses the open water characteristics of the propeller; 2. a simple stripwise two-dimensional unsteady procedure; 3. an unsteady lifting line procedure; and 4. four different numerical procedures based on unsteady lifting surface theory. The ranges of applicability and limitations of the evaluated procedures are assessed. The assessments of applicability are based on comparisons with: 1. model experimental periodic bearing loads over systematic ranges of propeller parameter in idealized wake patterns; 2. model experimental single-blade loads in idealized wake patterns; and 3. model experimental single-blade loads simulating the effects of waves and ship motions. Tradeoffs between accuracy of predictions versus ease and simplicity of the computational procedures for practical applications are discussed. The results show that unsteady lifting surface procedures give the best prediction of periodic bearing loads over practical ranges of propeller parameters. However, quasi-steady and empirical methods are adequate for estimating single blade loads for most practical applications.</description><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Computations</subject><subject>Fluid Mechanics</subject><subject>Lift</subject><subject>Loads(Forces)</subject><subject>Marine Engineering</subject><subject>Marine propellers</subject><subject>Mathematical prediction</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Nonuniform flow</subject><subject>Numerical Mathematics</subject><subject>Propeller blades</subject><subject>Ship motion</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAMKEpMLslMTsxR8E0tychPKVZIyy9SCChKTckEiuelKwSkFmXmAzlAsfyC1Jyc1CIFn_zElGIeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhmwI0Lr4YqDe1JN7RxdHQ2NTE1MyYgDQAWqIrmg</recordid><startdate>198310</startdate><enddate>198310</enddate><creator>Boswell,R. J</creator><creator>Kim,K</creator><creator>Jessup,S. D</creator><creator>Lin,G</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198310</creationdate><title>Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads</title><author>Boswell,R. J ; Kim,K ; Jessup,S. D ; Lin,G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1354563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Computations</topic><topic>Fluid Mechanics</topic><topic>Lift</topic><topic>Loads(Forces)</topic><topic>Marine Engineering</topic><topic>Marine propellers</topic><topic>Mathematical prediction</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Nonuniform flow</topic><topic>Numerical Mathematics</topic><topic>Propeller blades</topic><topic>Ship motion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boswell,R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim,K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessup,S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin,G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boswell,R. J</au><au>Kim,K</au><au>Jessup,S. D</au><au>Lin,G</au><aucorp>DAVID W TAYLOR NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER BETHESDA MD</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads</btitle><date>1983-10</date><risdate>1983</risdate><abstract>A variety of procedures for predicting periodic bearing (shaft) loads and single-blade loads on propellers operating in circumferentially nonuniform flow are systematically evaluated. These procedures include the following: 1. a simple quasi-steady procedure that uses the open water characteristics of the propeller; 2. a simple stripwise two-dimensional unsteady procedure; 3. an unsteady lifting line procedure; and 4. four different numerical procedures based on unsteady lifting surface theory. The ranges of applicability and limitations of the evaluated procedures are assessed. The assessments of applicability are based on comparisons with: 1. model experimental periodic bearing loads over systematic ranges of propeller parameter in idealized wake patterns; 2. model experimental single-blade loads in idealized wake patterns; and 3. model experimental single-blade loads simulating the effects of waves and ship motions. Tradeoffs between accuracy of predictions versus ease and simplicity of the computational procedures for practical applications are discussed. The results show that unsteady lifting surface procedures give the best prediction of periodic bearing loads over practical ranges of propeller parameters. However, quasi-steady and empirical methods are adequate for estimating single blade loads for most practical applications.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA135456
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects Angle of attack
Comparison
Computations
Fluid Mechanics
Lift
Loads(Forces)
Marine Engineering
Marine propellers
Mathematical prediction
Methodology
Nonuniform flow
Numerical Mathematics
Propeller blades
Ship motion
title Practical Methods for Predicting Periodic Propeller Loads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A02%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Practical%20Methods%20for%20Predicting%20Periodic%20Propeller%20Loads&rft.au=Boswell,R.%20J&rft.aucorp=DAVID%20W%20TAYLOR%20NAVAL%20SHIP%20RESEARCH%20AND%20DEVELOPMENT%20CENTER%20BETHESDA%20MD&rft.date=1983-10&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA135456%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true