Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control

The primary goal of this ongoing project is to model human behavior in specific situations and, in particular, to model high-level decisionmaking for antisubmarine warfare commanders. To abet this modeling effort the SHOR paradigm is presented as a structure for analyzing human cognitive decisionmak...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Wohl, Joseph G, Entin, Elliot E, Eterno, John S
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Wohl, Joseph G
Entin, Elliot E
Eterno, John S
description The primary goal of this ongoing project is to model human behavior in specific situations and, in particular, to model high-level decisionmaking for antisubmarine warfare commanders. To abet this modeling effort the SHOR paradigm is presented as a structure for analyzing human cognitive decisionmaking. SHOR describes decisionmaking as a cascading of four activities, they are: information processing, hypothesis generation and evaluation, option generation and evaluation, and decision execution. The commander's decisionmaking process is cast into the SHOR framework. A Bayesian (optimal) mathematical model of the decisionmaker's hypothesis evaluation procedure is developed. The inputs to the model are the hypotheses and sensor data, and its outputs are the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses' being true and their respective states of nature. It is assumed that these outputs are sufficient for the commander to perform the option generation and evaluation activities. A brief example of how the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses evolve in the light of new data and implications of the model are presented. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA125218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA125218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1252183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLDwzU9JzcnMS1fwKM1NzFNwSU3OLM7Mz1MIKMpPTi0uTi1WyMxTcM7PBUqmKICwc35eSVF-Dg8Da1piTnEqL5TmZpBxcw1x9tBNKclMji8uycxLLYl3dHE0NDI1MrQwJiANAAHZKtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Wohl, Joseph G ; Entin, Elliot E ; Eterno, John S</creator><creatorcontrib>Wohl, Joseph G ; Entin, Elliot E ; Eterno, John S ; ALPHATECH INC BURLINGTON MA</creatorcontrib><description>The primary goal of this ongoing project is to model human behavior in specific situations and, in particular, to model high-level decisionmaking for antisubmarine warfare commanders. To abet this modeling effort the SHOR paradigm is presented as a structure for analyzing human cognitive decisionmaking. SHOR describes decisionmaking as a cascading of four activities, they are: information processing, hypothesis generation and evaluation, option generation and evaluation, and decision execution. The commander's decisionmaking process is cast into the SHOR framework. A Bayesian (optimal) mathematical model of the decisionmaker's hypothesis evaluation procedure is developed. The inputs to the model are the hypotheses and sensor data, and its outputs are the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses' being true and their respective states of nature. It is assumed that these outputs are sufficient for the commander to perform the option generation and evaluation activities. A brief example of how the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses evolve in the light of new data and implications of the model are presented. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE ; COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS ; DECISION MAKING ; HUMANS ; INFORMATION PROCESSING ; MATHEMATICAL MODELS ; MILITARY COMMANDERS ; OFFICER PERSONNEL ; Psychology ; Undersea and Antisubmarine Warfare ; WUNR460001</subject><creationdate>1983</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA125218$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wohl, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Entin, Elliot E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eterno, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALPHATECH INC BURLINGTON MA</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control</title><description>The primary goal of this ongoing project is to model human behavior in specific situations and, in particular, to model high-level decisionmaking for antisubmarine warfare commanders. To abet this modeling effort the SHOR paradigm is presented as a structure for analyzing human cognitive decisionmaking. SHOR describes decisionmaking as a cascading of four activities, they are: information processing, hypothesis generation and evaluation, option generation and evaluation, and decision execution. The commander's decisionmaking process is cast into the SHOR framework. A Bayesian (optimal) mathematical model of the decisionmaker's hypothesis evaluation procedure is developed. The inputs to the model are the hypotheses and sensor data, and its outputs are the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses' being true and their respective states of nature. It is assumed that these outputs are sufficient for the commander to perform the option generation and evaluation activities. A brief example of how the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses evolve in the light of new data and implications of the model are presented. (Author)</description><subject>ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE</subject><subject>COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>HUMANS</subject><subject>INFORMATION PROCESSING</subject><subject>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</subject><subject>MILITARY COMMANDERS</subject><subject>OFFICER PERSONNEL</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Undersea and Antisubmarine Warfare</subject><subject>WUNR460001</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLDwzU9JzcnMS1fwKM1NzFNwSU3OLM7Mz1MIKMpPTi0uTi1WyMxTcM7PBUqmKICwc35eSVF-Dg8Da1piTnEqL5TmZpBxcw1x9tBNKclMji8uycxLLYl3dHE0NDI1MrQwJiANAAHZKtg</recordid><startdate>19830214</startdate><enddate>19830214</enddate><creator>Wohl, Joseph G</creator><creator>Entin, Elliot E</creator><creator>Eterno, John S</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830214</creationdate><title>Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control</title><author>Wohl, Joseph G ; Entin, Elliot E ; Eterno, John S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1252183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE</topic><topic>COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>HUMANS</topic><topic>INFORMATION PROCESSING</topic><topic>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</topic><topic>MILITARY COMMANDERS</topic><topic>OFFICER PERSONNEL</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Undersea and Antisubmarine Warfare</topic><topic>WUNR460001</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wohl, Joseph G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Entin, Elliot E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eterno, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALPHATECH INC BURLINGTON MA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wohl, Joseph G</au><au>Entin, Elliot E</au><au>Eterno, John S</au><aucorp>ALPHATECH INC BURLINGTON MA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control</btitle><date>1983-02-14</date><risdate>1983</risdate><abstract>The primary goal of this ongoing project is to model human behavior in specific situations and, in particular, to model high-level decisionmaking for antisubmarine warfare commanders. To abet this modeling effort the SHOR paradigm is presented as a structure for analyzing human cognitive decisionmaking. SHOR describes decisionmaking as a cascading of four activities, they are: information processing, hypothesis generation and evaluation, option generation and evaluation, and decision execution. The commander's decisionmaking process is cast into the SHOR framework. A Bayesian (optimal) mathematical model of the decisionmaker's hypothesis evaluation procedure is developed. The inputs to the model are the hypotheses and sensor data, and its outputs are the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses' being true and their respective states of nature. It is assumed that these outputs are sufficient for the commander to perform the option generation and evaluation activities. A brief example of how the posterior probabilities of the hypotheses evolve in the light of new data and implications of the model are presented. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA125218
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
DECISION MAKING
HUMANS
INFORMATION PROCESSING
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
MILITARY COMMANDERS
OFFICER PERSONNEL
Psychology
Undersea and Antisubmarine Warfare
WUNR460001
title Modeling Human Decision Processes in Command and Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Modeling%20Human%20Decision%20Processes%20in%20Command%20and%20Control&rft.au=Wohl,%20Joseph%20G&rft.aucorp=ALPHATECH%20INC%20BURLINGTON%20MA&rft.date=1983-02-14&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA125218%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true