Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner
A series of exercises was undertaken by participants from the three services, private industry, and academia to assess the comparability of propellant burning rate data among installations. The study involved both the closed bomb and high pressure strand burner techniques. Identical propellant formu...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Juhasz, Arpad A |
description | A series of exercises was undertaken by participants from the three services, private industry, and academia to assess the comparability of propellant burning rate data among installations. The study involved both the closed bomb and high pressure strand burner techniques. Identical propellant formulations were distributed to the participants, burned, and the data converted to burning rates using methods prevailing at each installation. In some cases closed bomb as well as strand burner results showed excellent agreement (to + or - 2.5 percent on the average and to within + or - 1 percent mid-range). In less favorable cases closed bomb burning rates from different installations exhibited two or three times as much scatter. In one case there were significant differences between closed bomb and strand burner data. For the closed bomb data, variations could be linked to experimental factors such as loading density, sample quickness, and ignition parameters, as well as post- acquisition data manipulation techniques such as smoothing and differentiation. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA120850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA120850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1208503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAIyi_NS1EIyk_KzFMISi0uzSkpVshPUyjJSFVwzskvTk1RcMrPTVJIBCoKLikCUU6lRXmpRTwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HGzTXE2UM3pSQzOb64JDMvtSTe0cXR0MjAwtTAmIA0AMsuKkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Juhasz, Arpad A</creator><creatorcontrib>Juhasz, Arpad A ; CHEMICAL PROPULSION INFORMATION AGENCY LAUREL MD</creatorcontrib><description>A series of exercises was undertaken by participants from the three services, private industry, and academia to assess the comparability of propellant burning rate data among installations. The study involved both the closed bomb and high pressure strand burner techniques. Identical propellant formulations were distributed to the participants, burned, and the data converted to burning rates using methods prevailing at each installation. In some cases closed bomb as well as strand burner results showed excellent agreement (to + or - 2.5 percent on the average and to within + or - 1 percent mid-range). In less favorable cases closed bomb burning rates from different installations exhibited two or three times as much scatter. In one case there were significant differences between closed bomb and strand burner data. For the closed bomb data, variations could be linked to experimental factors such as loading density, sample quickness, and ignition parameters, as well as post- acquisition data manipulation techniques such as smoothing and differentiation.</description><language>eng</language><subject>BURNING RATE ; CLOSED BOMB TESTS ; Combustion and Ignition ; COMPARISON ; DATA ACQUISITION ; DATA REDUCTION ; GUN PROPELLANTS ; PROPELLANTS ; ROUND ROBIN ; Solid Rocket Propellants ; STRAND BURNING RATE ; STRANDS ; TEST METHODS</subject><creationdate>1982</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA120850$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juhasz, Arpad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEMICAL PROPULSION INFORMATION AGENCY LAUREL MD</creatorcontrib><title>Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner</title><description>A series of exercises was undertaken by participants from the three services, private industry, and academia to assess the comparability of propellant burning rate data among installations. The study involved both the closed bomb and high pressure strand burner techniques. Identical propellant formulations were distributed to the participants, burned, and the data converted to burning rates using methods prevailing at each installation. In some cases closed bomb as well as strand burner results showed excellent agreement (to + or - 2.5 percent on the average and to within + or - 1 percent mid-range). In less favorable cases closed bomb burning rates from different installations exhibited two or three times as much scatter. In one case there were significant differences between closed bomb and strand burner data. For the closed bomb data, variations could be linked to experimental factors such as loading density, sample quickness, and ignition parameters, as well as post- acquisition data manipulation techniques such as smoothing and differentiation.</description><subject>BURNING RATE</subject><subject>CLOSED BOMB TESTS</subject><subject>Combustion and Ignition</subject><subject>COMPARISON</subject><subject>DATA ACQUISITION</subject><subject>DATA REDUCTION</subject><subject>GUN PROPELLANTS</subject><subject>PROPELLANTS</subject><subject>ROUND ROBIN</subject><subject>Solid Rocket Propellants</subject><subject>STRAND BURNING RATE</subject><subject>STRANDS</subject><subject>TEST METHODS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAIyi_NS1EIyk_KzFMISi0uzSkpVshPUyjJSFVwzskvTk1RcMrPTVJIBCoKLikCUU6lRXmpRTwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HGzTXE2UM3pSQzOb64JDMvtSTe0cXR0MjAwtTAmIA0AMsuKkw</recordid><startdate>198207</startdate><enddate>198207</enddate><creator>Juhasz, Arpad A</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198207</creationdate><title>Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner</title><author>Juhasz, Arpad A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA1208503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>BURNING RATE</topic><topic>CLOSED BOMB TESTS</topic><topic>Combustion and Ignition</topic><topic>COMPARISON</topic><topic>DATA ACQUISITION</topic><topic>DATA REDUCTION</topic><topic>GUN PROPELLANTS</topic><topic>PROPELLANTS</topic><topic>ROUND ROBIN</topic><topic>Solid Rocket Propellants</topic><topic>STRAND BURNING RATE</topic><topic>STRANDS</topic><topic>TEST METHODS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juhasz, Arpad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEMICAL PROPULSION INFORMATION AGENCY LAUREL MD</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juhasz, Arpad A</au><aucorp>CHEMICAL PROPULSION INFORMATION AGENCY LAUREL MD</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner</btitle><date>1982-07</date><risdate>1982</risdate><abstract>A series of exercises was undertaken by participants from the three services, private industry, and academia to assess the comparability of propellant burning rate data among installations. The study involved both the closed bomb and high pressure strand burner techniques. Identical propellant formulations were distributed to the participants, burned, and the data converted to burning rates using methods prevailing at each installation. In some cases closed bomb as well as strand burner results showed excellent agreement (to + or - 2.5 percent on the average and to within + or - 1 percent mid-range). In less favorable cases closed bomb burning rates from different installations exhibited two or three times as much scatter. In one case there were significant differences between closed bomb and strand burner data. For the closed bomb data, variations could be linked to experimental factors such as loading density, sample quickness, and ignition parameters, as well as post- acquisition data manipulation techniques such as smoothing and differentiation.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA120850 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | BURNING RATE CLOSED BOMB TESTS Combustion and Ignition COMPARISON DATA ACQUISITION DATA REDUCTION GUN PROPELLANTS PROPELLANTS ROUND ROBIN Solid Rocket Propellants STRAND BURNING RATE STRANDS TEST METHODS |
title | Round Robin Results of the Closed Bomb and Strand Burner |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Round%20Robin%20Results%20of%20the%20Closed%20Bomb%20and%20Strand%20Burner&rft.au=Juhasz,%20Arpad%20A&rft.aucorp=CHEMICAL%20PROPULSION%20INFORMATION%20AGENCY%20LAUREL%20MD&rft.date=1982-07&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA120850%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |