Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs
This volume presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate machines via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principle components contributing...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Burr,William E Fuller,Samuel H Shaman,Paul S Lamb,David A |
| description | This volume presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate machines via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principle components contributing to the nominal execution speed of the architecture. The S, M, and R measurements are discussed in detail in this report, but the following numbers are the most important, summary results of our evaluation process. These results are the composite performance of the candidate architectures for the set of 12 test programs specified by the CFA committee. Each test program was coded from two to four times on each architecture to minimize the effect of programmer variability. Analysis of Variance procedure was used to determine the overall relative performance of the three computer architectures.
See also Volume 4, AD-A049 483. |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA049482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA049482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA0494823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQRdNYiHoDi7mAQTSFlktMMJ1osA1DMtGB3WzYnQ3YeXSDiGBl9R_8x5tGz9SaPgg5yNGwfoBy9Z2FagmO4EJ6JLYdjJphESLIuUMNZ-qtkxiuVgdDUBRFDNmAOuBbty18wz_FgRFK8gInZ28OjZ9Hkxa1p8VnZ9Eyz8r0uGqE68oLdySVOqh1sk92m-2f-wUCp0W5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Burr,William E ; Fuller,Samuel H ; Shaman,Paul S ; Lamb,David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Burr,William E ; Fuller,Samuel H ; Shaman,Paul S ; Lamb,David A ; ARMY ELECTRONICS COMMAND FORT MONMOUTH N J</creatorcontrib><description>This volume presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate machines via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principle components contributing to the nominal execution speed of the architecture. The S, M, and R measurements are discussed in detail in this report, but the following numbers are the most important, summary results of our evaluation process. These results are the composite performance of the candidate architectures for the set of 12 test programs specified by the CFA committee. Each test program was coded from two to four times on each architecture to minimize the effect of programmer variability. Analysis of Variance procedure was used to determine the overall relative performance of the three computer architectures.
See also Volume 4, AD-A049 483.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ASH92 ; COMPARISON ; COMPATIBILITY ; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE ; Computer Hardware ; COMPUTER PERSONNEL ; COMPUTER PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION ; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ; Computer Programming and Software ; Computer software ; CYCLIC RATE ; DIGITAL COMPUTERS ; Execution time ; IBM S/370 computers ; Instruction sets ; Interdata 8/32 computers ; LIFE CYCLE COSTS ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MAINTENANCE ; Military computers ; MILITARY REQUIREMENTS ; PDP 11 computers ; PE62701A ; PROCUREMENT ; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES ; RANKING ; SELECTION ; Software compatibility ; STANDARDIZATION ; TEST AND EVALUATION ; TRAINING</subject><creationdate>1977</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA049482$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burr,William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller,Samuel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaman,Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb,David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ELECTRONICS COMMAND FORT MONMOUTH N J</creatorcontrib><title>Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs</title><description>This volume presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate machines via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principle components contributing to the nominal execution speed of the architecture. The S, M, and R measurements are discussed in detail in this report, but the following numbers are the most important, summary results of our evaluation process. These results are the composite performance of the candidate architectures for the set of 12 test programs specified by the CFA committee. Each test program was coded from two to four times on each architecture to minimize the effect of programmer variability. Analysis of Variance procedure was used to determine the overall relative performance of the three computer architectures.
See also Volume 4, AD-A049 483.</description><subject>ASH92</subject><subject>COMPARISON</subject><subject>COMPATIBILITY</subject><subject>COMPUTER APPLICATIONS</subject><subject>COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE</subject><subject>Computer Hardware</subject><subject>COMPUTER PERSONNEL</subject><subject>COMPUTER PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION</subject><subject>COMPUTER PROGRAMMING</subject><subject>Computer Programming and Software</subject><subject>Computer software</subject><subject>CYCLIC RATE</subject><subject>DIGITAL COMPUTERS</subject><subject>Execution time</subject><subject>IBM S/370 computers</subject><subject>Instruction sets</subject><subject>Interdata 8/32 computers</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLE COSTS</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MAINTENANCE</subject><subject>Military computers</subject><subject>MILITARY REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>PDP 11 computers</subject><subject>PE62701A</subject><subject>PROCUREMENT</subject><subject>PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES</subject><subject>RANKING</subject><subject>SELECTION</subject><subject>Software compatibility</subject><subject>STANDARDIZATION</subject><subject>TEST AND EVALUATION</subject><subject>TRAINING</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQRdNYiHoDi7mAQTSFlktMMJ1osA1DMtGB3WzYnQ3YeXSDiGBl9R_8x5tGz9SaPgg5yNGwfoBy9Z2FagmO4EJ6JLYdjJphESLIuUMNZ-qtkxiuVgdDUBRFDNmAOuBbty18wz_FgRFK8gInZ28OjZ9Hkxa1p8VnZ9Eyz8r0uGqE68oLdySVOqh1sk92m-2f-wUCp0W5</recordid><startdate>197709</startdate><enddate>197709</enddate><creator>Burr,William E</creator><creator>Fuller,Samuel H</creator><creator>Shaman,Paul S</creator><creator>Lamb,David A</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197709</creationdate><title>Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs</title><author>Burr,William E ; Fuller,Samuel H ; Shaman,Paul S ; Lamb,David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA0494823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>ASH92</topic><topic>COMPARISON</topic><topic>COMPATIBILITY</topic><topic>COMPUTER APPLICATIONS</topic><topic>COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE</topic><topic>Computer Hardware</topic><topic>COMPUTER PERSONNEL</topic><topic>COMPUTER PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION</topic><topic>COMPUTER PROGRAMMING</topic><topic>Computer Programming and Software</topic><topic>Computer software</topic><topic>CYCLIC RATE</topic><topic>DIGITAL COMPUTERS</topic><topic>Execution time</topic><topic>IBM S/370 computers</topic><topic>Instruction sets</topic><topic>Interdata 8/32 computers</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLE COSTS</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MAINTENANCE</topic><topic>Military computers</topic><topic>MILITARY REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>PDP 11 computers</topic><topic>PE62701A</topic><topic>PROCUREMENT</topic><topic>PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES</topic><topic>RANKING</topic><topic>SELECTION</topic><topic>Software compatibility</topic><topic>STANDARDIZATION</topic><topic>TEST AND EVALUATION</topic><topic>TRAINING</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burr,William E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller,Samuel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaman,Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb,David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ELECTRONICS COMMAND FORT MONMOUTH N J</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burr,William E</au><au>Fuller,Samuel H</au><au>Shaman,Paul S</au><au>Lamb,David A</au><aucorp>ARMY ELECTRONICS COMMAND FORT MONMOUTH N J</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs</btitle><date>1977-09</date><risdate>1977</risdate><abstract>This volume presents the evaluation of the Computer Family Architecture (CFA) candidate machines via a set of test programs. The measures used to rank the computer architectures were S, the size of the test program, and M and R, two measures designed to estimate the principle components contributing to the nominal execution speed of the architecture. The S, M, and R measurements are discussed in detail in this report, but the following numbers are the most important, summary results of our evaluation process. These results are the composite performance of the candidate architectures for the set of 12 test programs specified by the CFA committee. Each test program was coded from two to four times on each architecture to minimize the effect of programmer variability. Analysis of Variance procedure was used to determine the overall relative performance of the three computer architectures.
See also Volume 4, AD-A049 483.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA049482 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | ASH92 COMPARISON COMPATIBILITY COMPUTER APPLICATIONS COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE Computer Hardware COMPUTER PERSONNEL COMPUTER PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION COMPUTER PROGRAMMING Computer Programming and Software Computer software CYCLIC RATE DIGITAL COMPUTERS Execution time IBM S/370 computers Instruction sets Interdata 8/32 computers LIFE CYCLE COSTS Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies MAINTENANCE Military computers MILITARY REQUIREMENTS PDP 11 computers PE62701A PROCUREMENT PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES RANKING SELECTION Software compatibility STANDARDIZATION TEST AND EVALUATION TRAINING |
| title | Computer Family Architecture Selection Committee Final Report. Volume III. Evaluation of Computer Architecture via Test Programs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Computer%20Family%20Architecture%20Selection%20Committee%20Final%20Report.%20Volume%20III.%20Evaluation%20of%20Computer%20Architecture%20via%20Test%20Programs&rft.au=Burr,William%20E&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20ELECTRONICS%20COMMAND%20FORT%20MONMOUTH%20N%20J&rft.date=1977-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA049482%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |