Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One
The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Brusso, Robert Barnieu,Joanne Huang,Jessie Lodato,Michael Mulvaney,Rebecca Cummings,Paul Zoellick,Christopher Thieme,Ken Spain,Randall |
description | The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1034442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD1034442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10344423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAhxSc3JLEstysxLVwgpSszMAzEci4tTi4tzU_NKihUy8xQSFYLzc1IyU4sUnIFCqUWpKQo-qYlFYKWueWWZRfl5ILVWCpFAUQX_vFQeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhm1KSmRxfXJKZl1oS7-hiaGBsYmJiZExAGgAxATU9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall</creator><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall ; ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><description>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Army Learning Model ; army personnel ; army training ; Assessments ; Computer Programming and Software ; Game-based Training ; games ; military doctrine ; Military Forces and Organizations ; mobile application software ; Mobile learning ; mobile phones ; training devices ; virtual reality</subject><creationdate>2014</creationdate><rights>Approved For Public Release</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1034442$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnieu,Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang,Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodato,Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoellick,Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme,Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain,Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><description>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</description><subject>Army Learning Model</subject><subject>army personnel</subject><subject>army training</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer Programming and Software</subject><subject>Game-based Training</subject><subject>games</subject><subject>military doctrine</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>mobile application software</subject><subject>Mobile learning</subject><subject>mobile phones</subject><subject>training devices</subject><subject>virtual reality</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAhxSc3JLEstysxLVwgpSszMAzEci4tTi4tzU_NKihUy8xQSFYLzc1IyU4sUnIFCqUWpKQo-qYlFYKWueWWZRfl5ILVWCpFAUQX_vFQeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhm1KSmRxfXJKZl1oS7-hiaGBsYmJiZExAGgAxATU9</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Brusso, Robert</creator><creator>Barnieu,Joanne</creator><creator>Huang,Jessie</creator><creator>Lodato,Michael</creator><creator>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creator><creator>Cummings,Paul</creator><creator>Zoellick,Christopher</creator><creator>Thieme,Ken</creator><creator>Spain,Randall</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><author>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10344423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Army Learning Model</topic><topic>army personnel</topic><topic>army training</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer Programming and Software</topic><topic>Game-based Training</topic><topic>games</topic><topic>military doctrine</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>mobile application software</topic><topic>Mobile learning</topic><topic>mobile phones</topic><topic>training devices</topic><topic>virtual reality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnieu,Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang,Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodato,Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoellick,Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme,Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain,Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brusso, Robert</au><au>Barnieu,Joanne</au><au>Huang,Jessie</au><au>Lodato,Michael</au><au>Mulvaney,Rebecca</au><au>Cummings,Paul</au><au>Zoellick,Christopher</au><au>Thieme,Ken</au><au>Spain,Randall</au><aucorp>ICF International Fairfax United States</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</btitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><abstract>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1034442 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | Army Learning Model army personnel army training Assessments Computer Programming and Software Game-based Training games military doctrine Military Forces and Organizations mobile application software Mobile learning mobile phones training devices virtual reality |
title | Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Delivering%20Training%20Assessments%20in%20a%20Soldier%20Centered%20Learning%20Environment:%20Year%20One&rft.au=Brusso,%20Robert&rft.aucorp=ICF%20International%20Fairfax%20United%20States&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD1034442%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |