Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One

The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Brusso, Robert, Barnieu,Joanne, Huang,Jessie, Lodato,Michael, Mulvaney,Rebecca, Cummings,Paul, Zoellick,Christopher, Thieme,Ken, Spain,Randall
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Brusso, Robert
Barnieu,Joanne
Huang,Jessie
Lodato,Michael
Mulvaney,Rebecca
Cummings,Paul
Zoellick,Christopher
Thieme,Ken
Spain,Randall
description The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1034442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD1034442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10344423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAhxSc3JLEstysxLVwgpSszMAzEci4tTi4tzU_NKihUy8xQSFYLzc1IyU4sUnIFCqUWpKQo-qYlFYKWueWWZRfl5ILVWCpFAUQX_vFQeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhm1KSmRxfXJKZl1oS7-hiaGBsYmJiZExAGgAxATU9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall</creator><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall ; ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><description>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Army Learning Model ; army personnel ; army training ; Assessments ; Computer Programming and Software ; Game-based Training ; games ; military doctrine ; Military Forces and Organizations ; mobile application software ; Mobile learning ; mobile phones ; training devices ; virtual reality</subject><creationdate>2014</creationdate><rights>Approved For Public Release</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1034442$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnieu,Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang,Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodato,Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoellick,Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme,Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain,Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><description>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</description><subject>Army Learning Model</subject><subject>army personnel</subject><subject>army training</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer Programming and Software</subject><subject>Game-based Training</subject><subject>games</subject><subject>military doctrine</subject><subject>Military Forces and Organizations</subject><subject>mobile application software</subject><subject>Mobile learning</subject><subject>mobile phones</subject><subject>training devices</subject><subject>virtual reality</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAhxSc3JLEstysxLVwgpSszMAzEci4tTi4tzU_NKihUy8xQSFYLzc1IyU4sUnIFCqUWpKQo-qYlFYKWueWWZRfl5ILVWCpFAUQX_vFQeBta0xJziVF4ozc0g4-Ya4uyhm1KSmRxfXJKZl1oS7-hiaGBsYmJiZExAGgAxATU9</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Brusso, Robert</creator><creator>Barnieu,Joanne</creator><creator>Huang,Jessie</creator><creator>Lodato,Michael</creator><creator>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creator><creator>Cummings,Paul</creator><creator>Zoellick,Christopher</creator><creator>Thieme,Ken</creator><creator>Spain,Randall</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</title><author>Brusso, Robert ; Barnieu,Joanne ; Huang,Jessie ; Lodato,Michael ; Mulvaney,Rebecca ; Cummings,Paul ; Zoellick,Christopher ; Thieme,Ken ; Spain,Randall</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD10344423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Army Learning Model</topic><topic>army personnel</topic><topic>army training</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer Programming and Software</topic><topic>Game-based Training</topic><topic>games</topic><topic>military doctrine</topic><topic>Military Forces and Organizations</topic><topic>mobile application software</topic><topic>Mobile learning</topic><topic>mobile phones</topic><topic>training devices</topic><topic>virtual reality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brusso, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnieu,Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang,Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodato,Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvaney,Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings,Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoellick,Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme,Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain,Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ICF International Fairfax United States</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brusso, Robert</au><au>Barnieu,Joanne</au><au>Huang,Jessie</au><au>Lodato,Michael</au><au>Mulvaney,Rebecca</au><au>Cummings,Paul</au><au>Zoellick,Christopher</au><au>Thieme,Ken</au><au>Spain,Randall</au><aucorp>ICF International Fairfax United States</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One</btitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><abstract>The Army Learning Model (ALM) discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments in training technologies. It specifically mentions the use of pre-tests to tailor training and post-tests to ensure that learning has occurred to a standard. However, other than these recommendations, the ALM does not address how assessments should be designed, delivered, and otherwise used to maximize Soldier training. Questions regarding which type of assessment should be used, the optimal frequency of assessment and how to automate assessment in collaborative problem-solving scenarios remain to be answered. To address these issues the U.S. Army Research Institute (ARI) developed prototype training that provides a test-bed for conducting research on assessment strategies with maturing training technologies. This paper discusses the development of the prototype training and assessments, including a discussion of the prototype concept, the instructional design approach used to develop the training and corresponding assessments, and the technology considerations and constraints. The paper also describes the results of a beta test that examined the validity and usability of the training platforms and assessments. It concludes with a discussion of future research, which examines critical questions regarding the design and delivery of assessments within the prototype training.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_AD1034442
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects Army Learning Model
army personnel
army training
Assessments
Computer Programming and Software
Game-based Training
games
military doctrine
Military Forces and Organizations
mobile application software
Mobile learning
mobile phones
training devices
virtual reality
title Delivering Training Assessments in a Soldier Centered Learning Environment: Year One
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A28%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Delivering%20Training%20Assessments%20in%20a%20Soldier%20Centered%20Learning%20Environment:%20Year%20One&rft.au=Brusso,%20Robert&rft.aucorp=ICF%20International%20Fairfax%20United%20States&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD1034442%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true