CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS

A laboratory investigation was conducted (a) to determine compressive, tensile, and shear strength parameters of several concrete mixtures, (b) to evaluate the test methods utilized, and (c) to correlate the results obtained. Six- by twelve-in. concrete test specimens were cast from four different c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Saucier,Kenneth L
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Saucier,Kenneth L
description A laboratory investigation was conducted (a) to determine compressive, tensile, and shear strength parameters of several concrete mixtures, (b) to evaluate the test methods utilized, and (c) to correlate the results obtained. Six- by twelve-in. concrete test specimens were cast from four different concrete mixtures using the two types of aggregate (limestone and natural) and two cement factors (4 and 6 bags per cu yd). Compressive, tensile (diametral compression), and three types of direct shear strength tests were conducted on air-dried specimens, and triaxial tests were conducted on specimens representing three different moisture conditions. The shear strength determined by the Mohr envelope of failure for the triaxial tests most closely approximates the pure shear strength of concrete. The direct shear tests have inherent discrepancies in the methods and equipment that cast doubts on the results obtained through their use. The strength of concrete kept moist until time of test is lower than that of concrete that has been allowed to air-dry. The beneficial effects of angular aggregate as compared to rounded aggregate balance the detrimental effect of the higher water-cement ratios required for equal consistency. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0684920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD0684920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD06849203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLB09g8KcvVxDPH091Pwd1PwcAxycfVzdVFw9vdzDnINcVUIcQ0OUfB1DfHwdwlWcPRzUQhyDQ71CQnmYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4uBmYWJpZGBsYEpAH3bSXS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Saucier,Kenneth L</creator><creatorcontrib>Saucier,Kenneth L ; ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS</creatorcontrib><description>A laboratory investigation was conducted (a) to determine compressive, tensile, and shear strength parameters of several concrete mixtures, (b) to evaluate the test methods utilized, and (c) to correlate the results obtained. Six- by twelve-in. concrete test specimens were cast from four different concrete mixtures using the two types of aggregate (limestone and natural) and two cement factors (4 and 6 bags per cu yd). Compressive, tensile (diametral compression), and three types of direct shear strength tests were conducted on air-dried specimens, and triaxial tests were conducted on specimens representing three different moisture conditions. The shear strength determined by the Mohr envelope of failure for the triaxial tests most closely approximates the pure shear strength of concrete. The direct shear tests have inherent discrepancies in the methods and equipment that cast doubts on the results obtained through their use. The strength of concrete kept moist until time of test is lower than that of concrete that has been allowed to air-dry. The beneficial effects of angular aggregate as compared to rounded aggregate balance the detrimental effect of the higher water-cement ratios required for equal consistency. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>AGGREGATES(MATERIALS) ; CEMENTS ; COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES ; CONCRETE ; FAILURE(MECHANICS) ; GRAPHS(CHARTS) ; Laminates and Composite Materials ; LIMESTONE ; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES ; Mechanics ; MOISTURE ; SHEAR STRESSES ; STRAIN(MECHANICS) ; TENSILE PROPERTIES ; TEST METHODS</subject><creationdate>1969</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0684920$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saucier,Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS</creatorcontrib><title>CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS</title><description>A laboratory investigation was conducted (a) to determine compressive, tensile, and shear strength parameters of several concrete mixtures, (b) to evaluate the test methods utilized, and (c) to correlate the results obtained. Six- by twelve-in. concrete test specimens were cast from four different concrete mixtures using the two types of aggregate (limestone and natural) and two cement factors (4 and 6 bags per cu yd). Compressive, tensile (diametral compression), and three types of direct shear strength tests were conducted on air-dried specimens, and triaxial tests were conducted on specimens representing three different moisture conditions. The shear strength determined by the Mohr envelope of failure for the triaxial tests most closely approximates the pure shear strength of concrete. The direct shear tests have inherent discrepancies in the methods and equipment that cast doubts on the results obtained through their use. The strength of concrete kept moist until time of test is lower than that of concrete that has been allowed to air-dry. The beneficial effects of angular aggregate as compared to rounded aggregate balance the detrimental effect of the higher water-cement ratios required for equal consistency. (Author)</description><subject>AGGREGATES(MATERIALS)</subject><subject>CEMENTS</subject><subject>COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES</subject><subject>CONCRETE</subject><subject>FAILURE(MECHANICS)</subject><subject>GRAPHS(CHARTS)</subject><subject>Laminates and Composite Materials</subject><subject>LIMESTONE</subject><subject>MECHANICAL PROPERTIES</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>MOISTURE</subject><subject>SHEAR STRESSES</subject><subject>STRAIN(MECHANICS)</subject><subject>TENSILE PROPERTIES</subject><subject>TEST METHODS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1969</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLB09g8KcvVxDPH091Pwd1PwcAxycfVzdVFw9vdzDnINcVUIcQ0OUfB1DfHwdwlWcPRzUQhyDQ71CQnmYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4uBmYWJpZGBsYEpAH3bSXS</recordid><startdate>196903</startdate><enddate>196903</enddate><creator>Saucier,Kenneth L</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196903</creationdate><title>CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS</title><author>Saucier,Kenneth L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD06849203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1969</creationdate><topic>AGGREGATES(MATERIALS)</topic><topic>CEMENTS</topic><topic>COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES</topic><topic>CONCRETE</topic><topic>FAILURE(MECHANICS)</topic><topic>GRAPHS(CHARTS)</topic><topic>Laminates and Composite Materials</topic><topic>LIMESTONE</topic><topic>MECHANICAL PROPERTIES</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>MOISTURE</topic><topic>SHEAR STRESSES</topic><topic>STRAIN(MECHANICS)</topic><topic>TENSILE PROPERTIES</topic><topic>TEST METHODS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saucier,Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saucier,Kenneth L</au><aucorp>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MISS</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS</btitle><date>1969-03</date><risdate>1969</risdate><abstract>A laboratory investigation was conducted (a) to determine compressive, tensile, and shear strength parameters of several concrete mixtures, (b) to evaluate the test methods utilized, and (c) to correlate the results obtained. Six- by twelve-in. concrete test specimens were cast from four different concrete mixtures using the two types of aggregate (limestone and natural) and two cement factors (4 and 6 bags per cu yd). Compressive, tensile (diametral compression), and three types of direct shear strength tests were conducted on air-dried specimens, and triaxial tests were conducted on specimens representing three different moisture conditions. The shear strength determined by the Mohr envelope of failure for the triaxial tests most closely approximates the pure shear strength of concrete. The direct shear tests have inherent discrepancies in the methods and equipment that cast doubts on the results obtained through their use. The strength of concrete kept moist until time of test is lower than that of concrete that has been allowed to air-dry. The beneficial effects of angular aggregate as compared to rounded aggregate balance the detrimental effect of the higher water-cement ratios required for equal consistency. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0684920
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AGGREGATES(MATERIALS)
CEMENTS
COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES
CONCRETE
FAILURE(MECHANICS)
GRAPHS(CHARTS)
Laminates and Composite Materials
LIMESTONE
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
Mechanics
MOISTURE
SHEAR STRESSES
STRAIN(MECHANICS)
TENSILE PROPERTIES
TEST METHODS
title CORRELATION OF HARDENED CONCRETE TEST METHODS AND RESULTS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=CORRELATION%20OF%20HARDENED%20CONCRETE%20TEST%20METHODS%20AND%20RESULTS&rft.au=Saucier,Kenneth%20L&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20ENGINEER%20WATERWAYS%20EXPERIMENT%20STATION%20VICKSBURG%20MISS&rft.date=1969-03&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD0684920%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true