THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Proctor,John M |
description | The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author) |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0417937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD0417937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD04179373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbs4iPoHDu8HBKVCcQzJjQmEF01eJ4ciWqEgLs3_YxV3p3sP99x5dREHgrXQkilayji3YI1v1y7GQIoN2QAISVKePR8pMn1-CQIWP9Fkg4PPAkMnpByZEZbV7HF9jv3ql4tqbSHabe5luHVjGV596ZTZ7nfNoW7qP_MbUrwuvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Proctor,John M</creator><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M ; NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS ; NAVAL PERSONNEL ; RECRUITING</subject><creationdate>1963</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0417937$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><description>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</description><subject>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>NAVAL PERSONNEL</subject><subject>RECRUITING</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1963</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbs4iPoHDu8HBKVCcQzJjQmEF01eJ4ciWqEgLs3_YxV3p3sP99x5dREHgrXQkilayji3YI1v1y7GQIoN2QAISVKePR8pMn1-CQIWP9Fkg4PPAkMnpByZEZbV7HF9jv3ql4tqbSHabe5luHVjGV596ZTZ7nfNoW7qP_MbUrwuvg</recordid><startdate>196306</startdate><enddate>196306</enddate><creator>Proctor,John M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196306</creationdate><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><author>Proctor,John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD04179373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1963</creationdate><topic>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>NAVAL PERSONNEL</topic><topic>RECRUITING</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Proctor,John M</au><aucorp>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</btitle><date>1963-06</date><risdate>1963</risdate><abstract>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0417937 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS NAVAL PERSONNEL RECRUITING |
title | THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A03%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=THE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20SEQUENCE%20OF%20SCHOOL%20AND%20FLEET%20TRAINING%20ON%20THE%20RETENTION%20OF%20ENLISTED%20PERSONNEL&rft.au=Proctor,John%20M&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20PERSONNEL%20RESEARCH%20ACTIVITY%20WASHINGTON%20D%20C&rft.date=1963-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD0417937%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |