THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL

The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Proctor,John M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Proctor,John M
description The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0417937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD0417937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD04179373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbs4iPoHDu8HBKVCcQzJjQmEF01eJ4ciWqEgLs3_YxV3p3sP99x5dREHgrXQkilayji3YI1v1y7GQIoN2QAISVKePR8pMn1-CQIWP9Fkg4PPAkMnpByZEZbV7HF9jv3ql4tqbSHabe5luHVjGV596ZTZ7nfNoW7qP_MbUrwuvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Proctor,John M</creator><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M ; NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS ; NAVAL PERSONNEL ; RECRUITING</subject><creationdate>1963</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0417937$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><description>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</description><subject>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>NAVAL PERSONNEL</subject><subject>RECRUITING</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1963</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbs4iPoHDu8HBKVCcQzJjQmEF01eJ4ciWqEgLs3_YxV3p3sP99x5dREHgrXQkilayji3YI1v1y7GQIoN2QAISVKePR8pMn1-CQIWP9Fkg4PPAkMnpByZEZbV7HF9jv3ql4tqbSHabe5luHVjGV596ZTZ7nfNoW7qP_MbUrwuvg</recordid><startdate>196306</startdate><enddate>196306</enddate><creator>Proctor,John M</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196306</creationdate><title>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</title><author>Proctor,John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD04179373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1963</creationdate><topic>MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>NAVAL PERSONNEL</topic><topic>RECRUITING</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Proctor,John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Proctor,John M</au><aucorp>NAVAL PERSONNEL RESEARCH ACTIVITY WASHINGTON D C</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL</btitle><date>1963-06</date><risdate>1963</risdate><abstract>The effects of the sequence of school and fleet training on the retention of enlisted personnel were examined. Two training sequences were employed: (1) the ''School-First,'' or conven tional order, in which men are transferred from recruit training centers to Class ''A'' school and then to fleet assignments; and (2) the ''Fleet-First,'' or experimental, condition in which men were transferred from recruit training centers to the fleet for approximately six months, then to Class ''A'' school, and finally back to the fleet. Men who were guaranteed assignment to Class ''A'' schools were labelled ''Committed.'' All other men in the sample were labelled ''Un committed.'' Enlisted personnel in four ratings (Machinist's Mate, Storekeeper, Radioman, Elec tronics Technician) were assigned to five condi tions: (1) ''Committed, School-First;'' (2) ''Committed, Fleet-First;'' (3) ''Uncommitted, School-First;'' (4) ''Uncommitted, Fleet-First;'' and (5) ''Apprentice.'' The results indicated that, in general, there was little difference between the retention rates of personnel who were assigned either to the ''School-First'' or ''Fleet-First'' conditions. However, the rela tive advantage of ''School-First'' or ''Fleet First'' conditions did vary both within the ''Committed'' and ''Uncommitted'' conditions, and within rating. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0417937
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS
NAVAL PERSONNEL
RECRUITING
title THE EFFECTS OF SEQUENCE OF SCHOOL AND FLEET TRAINING ON THE RETENTION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A03%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=THE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20SEQUENCE%20OF%20SCHOOL%20AND%20FLEET%20TRAINING%20ON%20THE%20RETENTION%20OF%20ENLISTED%20PERSONNEL&rft.au=Proctor,John%20M&rft.aucorp=NAVAL%20PERSONNEL%20RESEARCH%20ACTIVITY%20WASHINGTON%20D%20C&rft.date=1963-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD0417937%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true