A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT

Guidelines for text reduction were developed and evaluated to advance the art of manually preparing informative abstracts. The study was intended to: (1) develop guidelines that result in abstracts which provide maximal support to abstract-users, and (2) develop these guidelines so that they result...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: PAYNE,DAN, MUNGER,SARA J, ALTMAN,JAMES W
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator PAYNE,DAN
MUNGER,SARA J
ALTMAN,JAMES W
description Guidelines for text reduction were developed and evaluated to advance the art of manually preparing informative abstracts. The study was intended to: (1) develop guidelines that result in abstracts which provide maximal support to abstract-users, and (2) develop these guidelines so that they result in reliable, i.e., consistent, abstracts of scientific/technical material. The abstracting procedure, and Abstracting Form and associated instructions, produces reasonably consistent abstracts. An expert judge rated 13 subsections of six technical papers prepared by three different abstracters as 88% consistent, i.e., contained identical information. The abstracts prepared were a substantial reduction of the original text. Considering the six abstracts used in a performance test (judged as containing the most information, but not necessarily the longest) mean percentage reductions obtained were: 47% reduction of words, 28% reduction of figures, and 27% reduction of equations. Level of performance, as measured by accuracy on use-tests, supported by abstracts was equivalent to that supported by original text, regardless of test time restriction. However, total test time required was less using abstracts than with full text. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0285082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AD0285082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD02850823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAh0VAhxjQgJdfRRcHQKDglydA7x9HMHijl7-HkGhrrqKTgqBAS5-nj6evo5BkUquLiGufr4B_i6-oUoOPq5KLiGOfqEOoZ4-vspBIcGBPgHhfAwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dlJLM5Pjiksy81JJ4RxcDIwtTAwsjYwLSAOQsLKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>PAYNE,DAN ; MUNGER,SARA J ; ALTMAN,JAMES W</creator><creatorcontrib>PAYNE,DAN ; MUNGER,SARA J ; ALTMAN,JAMES W ; AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH PITTSBURGH PA</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines for text reduction were developed and evaluated to advance the art of manually preparing informative abstracts. The study was intended to: (1) develop guidelines that result in abstracts which provide maximal support to abstract-users, and (2) develop these guidelines so that they result in reliable, i.e., consistent, abstracts of scientific/technical material. The abstracting procedure, and Abstracting Form and associated instructions, produces reasonably consistent abstracts. An expert judge rated 13 subsections of six technical papers prepared by three different abstracters as 88% consistent, i.e., contained identical information. The abstracts prepared were a substantial reduction of the original text. Considering the six abstracts used in a performance test (judged as containing the most information, but not necessarily the longest) mean percentage reductions obtained were: 47% reduction of words, 28% reduction of figures, and 27% reduction of equations. Level of performance, as measured by accuracy on use-tests, supported by abstracts was equivalent to that supported by original text, regardless of test time restriction. However, total test time required was less using abstracts than with full text. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>ABSTRACTS ; DESIGN ; RELIABILITY ; STANDARDIZATION</subject><creationdate>1962</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,777,882,27548,27549</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0285082$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAYNE,DAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNGER,SARA J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALTMAN,JAMES W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH PITTSBURGH PA</creatorcontrib><title>A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT</title><description>Guidelines for text reduction were developed and evaluated to advance the art of manually preparing informative abstracts. The study was intended to: (1) develop guidelines that result in abstracts which provide maximal support to abstract-users, and (2) develop these guidelines so that they result in reliable, i.e., consistent, abstracts of scientific/technical material. The abstracting procedure, and Abstracting Form and associated instructions, produces reasonably consistent abstracts. An expert judge rated 13 subsections of six technical papers prepared by three different abstracters as 88% consistent, i.e., contained identical information. The abstracts prepared were a substantial reduction of the original text. Considering the six abstracts used in a performance test (judged as containing the most information, but not necessarily the longest) mean percentage reductions obtained were: 47% reduction of words, 28% reduction of figures, and 27% reduction of equations. Level of performance, as measured by accuracy on use-tests, supported by abstracts was equivalent to that supported by original text, regardless of test time restriction. However, total test time required was less using abstracts than with full text. (Author)</description><subject>ABSTRACTS</subject><subject>DESIGN</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>STANDARDIZATION</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1962</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAh0VAhxjQgJdfRRcHQKDglydA7x9HMHijl7-HkGhrrqKTgqBAS5-nj6evo5BkUquLiGufr4B_i6-oUoOPq5KLiGOfqEOoZ4-vspBIcGBPgHhfAwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dlJLM5Pjiksy81JJ4RxcDIwtTAwsjYwLSAOQsLKo</recordid><startdate>19620823</startdate><enddate>19620823</enddate><creator>PAYNE,DAN</creator><creator>MUNGER,SARA J</creator><creator>ALTMAN,JAMES W</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19620823</creationdate><title>A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT</title><author>PAYNE,DAN ; MUNGER,SARA J ; ALTMAN,JAMES W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_AD02850823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1962</creationdate><topic>ABSTRACTS</topic><topic>DESIGN</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>STANDARDIZATION</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAYNE,DAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNGER,SARA J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALTMAN,JAMES W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH PITTSBURGH PA</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAYNE,DAN</au><au>MUNGER,SARA J</au><au>ALTMAN,JAMES W</au><aucorp>AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH PITTSBURGH PA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT</btitle><date>1962-08-23</date><risdate>1962</risdate><abstract>Guidelines for text reduction were developed and evaluated to advance the art of manually preparing informative abstracts. The study was intended to: (1) develop guidelines that result in abstracts which provide maximal support to abstract-users, and (2) develop these guidelines so that they result in reliable, i.e., consistent, abstracts of scientific/technical material. The abstracting procedure, and Abstracting Form and associated instructions, produces reasonably consistent abstracts. An expert judge rated 13 subsections of six technical papers prepared by three different abstracters as 88% consistent, i.e., contained identical information. The abstracts prepared were a substantial reduction of the original text. Considering the six abstracts used in a performance test (judged as containing the most information, but not necessarily the longest) mean percentage reductions obtained were: 47% reduction of words, 28% reduction of figures, and 27% reduction of equations. Level of performance, as measured by accuracy on use-tests, supported by abstracts was equivalent to that supported by original text, regardless of test time restriction. However, total test time required was less using abstracts than with full text. (Author)</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_AD0285082
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ABSTRACTS
DESIGN
RELIABILITY
STANDARDIZATION
title A TEXTUAL ABSTRACTING TECHNIQUE. A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A50%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A%20TEXTUAL%20ABSTRACTING%20TECHNIQUE.%20A%20PRELIMINARY%20DEVELOPMENT%20AND%20EVALUATION%20SUPPORT&rft.au=PAYNE,DAN&rft.aucorp=AMERICAN%20INSTITUTES%20FOR%20RESEARCH%20PITTSBURGH%20PA&rft.date=1962-08-23&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EAD0285082%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true