Heart rate detection properties of dry-electrode ECG compared to conventional 3-lead gel-electrode ECG in newborns

To compare the accuracy of heart rate detection properties of a novel, wireless, dry-electrode electrocardiogram (ECG) device, NeoBeat®, to that of a conventional 3-lead gel-electrode ECG monitor (PropaqM®) in newborns. The study population had a mean gestational age of 39 weeks and 2 days (1.5 week...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC research notes 2021-05, Vol.14 (1), p.166-166, Article 166
Hauptverfasser: Pike, Hanne, Eilevstjønn, Joar, Bjorland, Peder, Linde, Jørgen, Ersdal, Hege, Rettedal, Siren
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare the accuracy of heart rate detection properties of a novel, wireless, dry-electrode electrocardiogram (ECG) device, NeoBeat®, to that of a conventional 3-lead gel-electrode ECG monitor (PropaqM®) in newborns. The study population had a mean gestational age of 39 weeks and 2 days (1.5 weeks) and birth weight 3528 g (668 g). There were 950 heart rate notations from each device, but heart rate was absent from the reference monitor in 14 of these data points, leaving 936 data pairs to compare. The mean (SD) difference when comparing NeoBeat to the reference monitor was -0.25 (9.91) beats per minute (bpm) (p = 0.44). There was a deviation of more than 10 bpm in 7.4% of the data pairs, which primarily (78%) was attributed to ECG signal disturbance, and secondly (22%) due to algorithm differences between the devices. Excluding these outliers, the correlation was equally consistent (r  = 0.96) in the full range of heart rate captured measurements with a mean difference of - 0.16 (3.09) bpm. The mean difference was less than 1 bpm regardless of whether outliers were included or not.
ISSN:1756-0500
1756-0500
DOI:10.1186/s13104-021-05576-x