Edible insects: A survey about perceptions regarding possible beneficial health effects and safety concerns among adult citizens from Portugal and Romania

Although edible insects (EI) have been consumed for ages in many countries around the world, in most European countries, this is not a traditional practice. Still, it has been encouraged as a sustainable source of animal protein besides other nutrients. The Food and Agricultural Organization and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open agriculture 2024-09, Vol.9 (1), p.100309-91
Hauptverfasser: Guiné, Raquel P. F., Florença, Sofia G., Costa, Cristina A., Correia, Paula M. R., Ferreira, Manuela, Cardoso, Ana P., Campos, Sofia, Anjos, Ofélia, Bacarea, Vladimir, Bacarea, Anca, Buicu, Gabriela, Szasz, Simona, Martin-Hadmaș, Roxana, Tarcea, Monica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although edible insects (EI) have been consumed for ages in many countries around the world, in most European countries, this is not a traditional practice. Still, it has been encouraged as a sustainable source of animal protein besides other nutrients. The Food and Agricultural Organization and the United Nations, recommend consuming EI as a way to contribute to the sustainable development goals. Hence, this research investigated how participants from Portugal and Romania perceive EI, and how these can be useful as a source of nutrients and other benefits for human health, as well as possible risks. For that, it was undertaken a questionnaire survey, with data collected online in the two countries. For the analysis of data, basis statistics and chi-square tests were used. Results showed significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian participants in six out of ten questions, namely regarding safety ( < 0.001), use in traditional medicine ( < 0.001), possible infection with parasites ( = 0.021), of pesticides ( = 0.031), their usage as therapeutics ( = 0.001) and being potential sources of allergens ( < 0.001) and aflatoxins ( < 0.001). Also, differences were tested for other sociodemographic variables. The results showed significant differences according to age for only three questions, gender for only two questions, and Education for most of the questions, i.e., six out of the ten. These results highlighted the greater influence of variables like country of origin and education in the perception of the effects of EI in human health.
ISSN:2391-9531
2391-9531
DOI:10.1515/opag-2022-0326