Fluorescence molecular optomic signatures improve identification of tumors in head and neck specimens

Fluorescence molecular imaging using ABY-029, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted, synthetic Affibody peptide labeled with a near-infrared fluorophore, is under investigation for surgical guidance during head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) resection. However, tumor-to-normal tissue contrast is confounded by intrinsic physiological limitations of heterogeneous EGFR expression and non-specific agent uptake. In this preliminary study, radiomic analysis was applied to optical ABY-029 fluorescence image data for HNSCC tissue classification through an approach termed "optomics." Optomics was employed to improve tumor identification by leveraging textural pattern differences in EGFR expression conveyed by fluorescence. The study objective was to compare the performance of conventional fluorescence intensity thresholding and optomics for binary classification of malignant vs. non-malignant HNSCC tissues. Fluorescence image data collected through a Phase 0 clinical trial of ABY-029 involved a total of 20,073 sub-image patches (size of 1.8 × 1.8 mm ) extracted from 24 bread-loafed slices of HNSCC surgical resections originating from 12 patients who were stratified into three dose groups (30, 90, and 171 nanomoles). Each dose group was randomly partitioned on the specimen-level 75%/25% into training/testing sets, then all training and testing sets were aggregated. A total of 1,472 standardized radiomic features were extracted from each patch and evaluated by minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection, and 25 top-ranked features were used to train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Predictive performance of the SVM classifier was compared to fluorescence intensity thresholding for classifying testing set image patches with histologically confirmed malignancy status. Optomics provided consistent improvement in prediction accuracy and false positive rate (FPR) and similar false negative rate (FNR) on all testing set slices, irrespective of dose, compared to fluorescence intensity thresholding (mean accuracies of 89% vs. 81%, = 0.0072; mean FPRs of 12% vs. 21%, = 0.0035; and mean FNRs of 13% vs. 17%, = 0.35). Optomics outperformed conventional fluorescence intensity thresholding for tumor identification using sub-image patches as the unit of analysis. Optomics mitigate diagnostic uncertainties introduced through physiological variability, imaging agent dose, and inter-specimen biases of fluorescence molecular imaging by pro