Finite element analysis of the tibial component alignment in frontal and sagittal plane in total knee arthroplasty

Background. This study aims to analyze the tibial component using the finite element method by cutting the tibial in frontal and sagittal planes at an angle between 1.5° (valgus and anterior tilt) and -1.5° (varus and posterior tilt). Methods. This experimental study used the finite element method a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista medicală Română 2021-09, Vol.68 (3), p.374-378
Hauptverfasser: Popescu, Roman, Cristea, Stefan, Pascu, Adrian Marius, Oleksik, Valentin, Haritinian, Emil George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. This study aims to analyze the tibial component using the finite element method by cutting the tibial in frontal and sagittal planes at an angle between 1.5° (valgus and anterior tilt) and -1.5° (varus and posterior tilt). Methods. This experimental study used the finite element method as an useful tool for simulating the positioning of the tibial component in order to create a personal pre-operative planning. For the finite element method analysis, a geometrical model of a tibia from a cadaver was three – dimensionally scanned and the tibial component, polyethylene and cement, were three-dimensionally shaped in Computer-Aided Design program using material data such as Young modulus (gigapascal – GPa) and the Poisson coefficient. The analysis determined the equivalent von Mises stress, the maximum displacement of the components and the equivalent von Mises deformation. The results showed that equivalent tension and deformation have higher values in the tibia and the polyethylene, which deform faster than cement and the tibial component. In our study, we chose to simulate the tibial resection at a cutting angle ± 1.5° from neutral positioning (which is represented in frontal plane by the perpendicular on the mechanical axis and in sagittal plane by the posterior slope of 7 degree) in frontal and sagittal plane in order to find the minimum threshold from which the tibial component malalignment may begin to determine unfavorable effects. Results. Our results have shown detrimental effects begin to appear for the polyethene component at -1.5° in frontal plane, and the rest of the components at 1.5° in sagittal plane. Conclusion. This finding leads us to propose preoperative planning based on personal calculus of predefined angles, which may show the surgeon the optimal implantation position of the tibial component.
ISSN:1220-5478
2069-606X
DOI:10.37897/RMJ.2021.3.7