Water uptake patterns of pea and barley responded to drought but not to cropping systems
Agricultural production is under threat of water scarcity due to increasingly frequent and severe drought events under climate change. Whether a change in cropping systems can be used as an effective adaptation strategy against drought is still unclear. We investigated how plant water uptake pattern...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biogeosciences 2022-04, Vol.19 (6), p.1853-1869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Agricultural production is under threat of water scarcity
due to increasingly frequent and severe drought events under climate change.
Whether a change in cropping systems can be used as an effective adaptation
strategy against drought is still unclear. We investigated how plant water
uptake patterns of a field-grown pea–barley (Pisum sativum L. and Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture, an
important fodder intercrop, responded to experimental drought under four
cropping systems, i.e. organic intensive tillage, conventional intensive
tillage, conventional no tillage, and organic reduced tillage. Drought was
simulated after crop establishment using rain shelters. Proportional
contributions to plant water uptake from different soil layers were
estimated based on stable water isotopes using Bayesian mixing models. Pea
plants always took up proportionally more water from shallower depths than
barley plants. Water uptake patterns of neither species were affected by
cropping systems. Both species showed similar responses to the drought
simulation and increased their proportional water uptake from the shallow soil
layer (0–20 cm) in all cropping systems. Our results highlight the impact of
drought on plant water uptake patterns for two important crop species and
suggest that cropping systems might not be as successful as adaptation
strategies against drought as previously thought. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1726-4189 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
DOI: | 10.5194/bg-19-1853-2022 |