Retrospective Analysis of a Real-Life Use of Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab plus SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals for Treatment of COVID-19

Tixagevimab–cilgavimab is effective for the treatment of early COVID-19 in outpatients with risk factors for progression to severe illness, as well as for primary prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the hospital stay (expressed in days), prognosis, and nega...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2023-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1493
Hauptverfasser: Capoluongo, Nicolina, Mascolo, Annamaria, Bernardi, Francesca Futura, Sarno, Marina, Mattera, Valentina, di Flumeri, Giusy, Pustorino, Bruno, Spaterella, Micaela, Trama, Ugo, Capuano, Annalisa, Perrella, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Tixagevimab–cilgavimab is effective for the treatment of early COVID-19 in outpatients with risk factors for progression to severe illness, as well as for primary prevention and post-exposure prophylaxis. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the hospital stay (expressed in days), prognosis, and negativity rate for COVID-19 in patients after treatment with tixagevimab–cilgavimab. We enrolled 42 patients who were nasal swab-positive for SARS-CoV-2 (antigenic and molecular)—both vaccinated and not vaccinated for COVID-19—hospitalized at the first division of the Cotugno Hospital in Naples who had received a single intramuscular dose of tixagevimab–cilgavimab (300 mg/300 mg). All patient candidates for tixagevimab–cilgavimab had immunocompromised immune systems either due to chronic degenerative disorders (Group A: 27 patients) or oncohematological diseases (Group B: 15 patients). Patients enrolled in group A came under our observation after 10 days of clinical symptoms and 5 days after testing positivite for COVID-19, unlike the other patients enrolled in the study. The mean stay in hospital for the patients in Group A was 21 ± 5 days vs. 25 ± 5 days in Group B. Twenty patients tested negative after a median hospitalization stay of 16 days (IQR: 18–15.25); of them, five (25%) patients belonged to group B. Therefore, patients with active hematological malignancy had a lower negativization rate when treated 10 days after the onset of clinical symptoms and five days after their first COVID-19 positive nasal swab.
ISSN:1424-8247
1424-8247
DOI:10.3390/ph16101493