Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019

To evaluate the activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and spp. for t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiology spectrum 2022-12, Vol.10 (6), p.e0171522-e0171522
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Li, Yang, Yang, Zheng, Changhe, Sun, Gang, Han, Renru, Guo, Yan, Yin, Dandan, Wu, Shi, Zhu, Demei, Hu, Fupin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Eravacycline was highly active against Staphylococcus and species isolates, proved by the MIC : 0.06/0.125, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.125/0.5, 0.125/0.25, and 0.03/0.06 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively. S. aureus isolates tested were fully susceptible to tedizolid. Still, nonsusceptible isolates were found for E. faecalis (72/567 [12.7%]) and E. faecium (12/501 [2.4%]). Norvancomycin at 2 mg/L could inhibit 100% of Staphylococcus spp., while 1 mg/L of ceftaroline could inhibit 78.9% of MRSA and 99.9% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Additionally, nemonoxacin was also active against Staphylococcus and species isolates tested (shown by the following MIC s and ranges, in milligrams per liter: 2 and ≤0.015 to 8 for MRSA, 0.25 and ≤0.015 to 4 for MSSA, 0.5 and ≤0.015 to 8 for S. epidermidis, and 4 and ≤0.015 to >32 for E. faecalis). In conclusion, both eravacycline and tedizolid were highly active against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. and spp. recently collected across China. Nemonoxacin showed potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. and E. faecalis but limited activity against E. faecium. Norvancomycin and ceftaroline displayed highly potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. Antimicrobial resistance has become a severe threat to global public health. According to statistics, nearly 700,000 people die from bacterial infections worldwide (J. O'Neill, , 2014; C. Y. Chin, K. A. Tipton, M. Farokhyfar, E. M. Burd, et al., Nat Microbiol 3:563-569, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0151-5). The number of bacterial infections is expected to climb to 10 million by 2050, showing that bacterial resistance has become a significant problem that cannot be ignored. It is crucial to develop new antimicrobial agents to combat antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemo
ISSN:2165-0497
2165-0497
DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01715-22