Amorphous alloys surpass E/10 strength limit at extreme strain rates

Theoretical predictions of the ideal strength of materials range from E /30 to E /10 ( E is Young’s modulus). However, despite intense interest over the last decade, the value of the ideal strength achievable through experiments for metals remains a mystery. This study showcases the remarkable spall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature communications 2024-02, Vol.15 (1), p.1717-1717, Article 1717
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Wenqing, Li, Zhi, Shu, Hua, Gao, Huajian, Wei, Xiaoding
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Theoretical predictions of the ideal strength of materials range from E /30 to E /10 ( E is Young’s modulus). However, despite intense interest over the last decade, the value of the ideal strength achievable through experiments for metals remains a mystery. This study showcases the remarkable spall strength of Cu 50 Zr 50 amorphous alloy that exceeds the E /10 limit at strain rates greater than 10 7 s −1 through laser-induced shock experiments. The material exhibits a spall strength of 11.5 GPa, approximately E /6 or 1/13 of its P-wave modulus, which sets a record for the elastic limit of metals. Electron microscopy and large-scale molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the primary failure mechanism at extreme strain rates is void nucleation and growth, rather than shear-banding. The rate dependence of material strength is explained by a void kinetic model controlled by surface energy. These findings help advance our understanding on the mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys under extreme strain rates. Magnitude of the ideal strength achievable in experiments for metals remains to be known. Here, the authors show that the spall strength of Cu50Zr50 amorphous alloy exceeds the E/10 limit at extreme strain rates, showing the void nucleation and growth as the primary failure mechanism.
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-45472-z