The Combined Impact of Intense Pulsed Light Combined and 3% Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study

Introduction The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the combination of intense pulsed light (IPL) with 3% diquafosol (DQS) ophthalmic solution is more effective than intense pulsed light in alleviating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED). Methods This randomized study inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology and Therapy 2023-12, Vol.12 (6), p.2959-2971
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Jiayan, Qin, Guanghao, Li, Liangzhe, Qi, Yifan, Xia, Yang, Zhang, Qing, Wu, Yi, You, Yue, Yang, Lanting, Guo, Naici, Moutari, Salissou, Moore, Jonathan E., Bu, Shaochong, Xu, Ling, He, Wei, Yu, Sile, Pazo, Emmanuel Eric, He, Xingru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the combination of intense pulsed light (IPL) with 3% diquafosol (DQS) ophthalmic solution is more effective than intense pulsed light in alleviating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED). Methods This randomized study included 66 participants with evaporative dry eye (EDE) who received IPL + DQS therapy ( n  = 44 eyes), IPL therapy ( n  = 44 eyes), or sham therapy ( n  = 44 eyes). All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 14 (D14), and day 28 (D28) for non-invasive break-up time (NITBUT), tear-film lipid layer (TFLL), corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expression (MGEx), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Results At day 28, comparison among the IPL + DQS therapy, IPL therapy, and sham therapy found significant differences in the mean NITBUT (12.03 ± 1.27 versus 10.47 ± 3.48 versus 4.57 ± 0.46; p  
ISSN:2193-8245
2193-6528
DOI:10.1007/s40123-023-00784-z