A physical wind‐turbine wake growth model under different stratified atmospheric conditions
The wind‐turbine wake growth is crucial for wake assessment. At present, it can only be determined empirically, which is the primary source of prediction errors in the analytical wake model, and a physically‐based method is urgently needed. Recently, the plume model is proposed for wake width predic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wind energy (Chichester, England) England), 2022-10, Vol.25 (10), p.1812-1836 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The wind‐turbine wake growth is crucial for wake assessment. At present, it can only be determined empirically, which is the primary source of prediction errors in the analytical wake model, and a physically‐based method is urgently needed. Recently, the plume model is proposed for wake width prediction in the neutral boundary layer based on Taylor's diffusion theory. However, this model is not applicable for high‐roughness neutral and strongly convective conditions, which is mainly related to the fact that the specified far wake point in the plume model is too close to the virtual wake origin. In this condition, the wake width prediction has evident convex function characteristics, which is inconsistent with the actual linear expansion of wake width. To this end, we propose a coupled model of the plume model and the traditional wake model (CPT model) to calculate the wake growth rate iteratively, thereby obtaining the wake width and velocity deficits in the far‐wake region. The average wake width prediction error decreases from 11.75% to 3.1% in these conditions. Since the wind‐turbine‐induced‐turbulence contribution is dominant in the wake recovery in the very stable boundary layer, both models have low but engineering acceptable prediction accuracy. Except for the above conditions, both the plume and CPT models can predict the wake width well, and their average wake width prediction errors are 2.5% and 1.9%, respectively. This implies that the proposed CPT model has higher prediction accuracy and a broader application range. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1095-4244 1099-1824 |
DOI: | 10.1002/we.2770 |