Aerodynamic characteristics of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of high-speed trains under crosswinds: A comparison study
As train speeds continuously increase, the crosswind stability of high-speed trains (HSTs) has been a prominent research topic. Benefiting from advances in railway technology, the coupled operation of different HSTs has been proven to be permissible, but the crosswind performance of double-connected...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alexandria engineering journal 2023-02, Vol.64, p.465-481 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As train speeds continuously increase, the crosswind stability of high-speed trains (HSTs) has been a prominent research topic. Benefiting from advances in railway technology, the coupled operation of different HSTs has been proven to be permissible, but the crosswind performance of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of HSTs has rarely been studied. This paper therefore studied the differences in the aerodynamic performance of double-connected train groups composed of same and different train units under crosswinds. We employed an improved delayed detached-eddy simulation (IDDES) method to investigate the flow features around different groups of double-connected train. Two one-eighth-scale standard HSTs—Train 1 (T 1) and Train 2 (T 2)—currently operating in China were selected to form different group configurations for double-connected trains: T 1-T 1 (Case 1–1), T 1-T 2 (Case 1–2), T 2-T 1 (Case 2–1), and T 2-T 2 (Case 2–2). First, the reliability of the numerical algorithm and mesh independence were verified to ensure the accuracy of the numerical results. Second, the aerodynamic force coefficients, time-averaged, and instantaneous flow structures of different double-connected train group types were compared and analyzed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1110-0168 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.011 |