Aerodynamic characteristics of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of high-speed trains under crosswinds: A comparison study

As train speeds continuously increase, the crosswind stability of high-speed trains (HSTs) has been a prominent research topic. Benefiting from advances in railway technology, the coupled operation of different HSTs has been proven to be permissible, but the crosswind performance of double-connected...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alexandria engineering journal 2023-02, Vol.64, p.465-481
Hauptverfasser: Huo, Xiao-Shuai, Liu, Tang-Hong, Chen, Zheng-Wei, Li, Wen-Hui, Niu, Ji-Qiang, Gao, Hong-Rui
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As train speeds continuously increase, the crosswind stability of high-speed trains (HSTs) has been a prominent research topic. Benefiting from advances in railway technology, the coupled operation of different HSTs has been proven to be permissible, but the crosswind performance of double-connected train groups composed of different kinds of HSTs has rarely been studied. This paper therefore studied the differences in the aerodynamic performance of double-connected train groups composed of same and different train units under crosswinds. We employed an improved delayed detached-eddy simulation (IDDES) method to investigate the flow features around different groups of double-connected train. Two one-eighth-scale standard HSTs—Train 1 (T 1) and Train 2 (T 2)—currently operating in China were selected to form different group configurations for double-connected trains: T 1-T 1 (Case 1–1), T 1-T 2 (Case 1–2), T 2-T 1 (Case 2–1), and T 2-T 2 (Case 2–2). First, the reliability of the numerical algorithm and mesh independence were verified to ensure the accuracy of the numerical results. Second, the aerodynamic force coefficients, time-averaged, and instantaneous flow structures of different double-connected train group types were compared and analyzed.
ISSN:1110-0168
DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.011