Pretransplant Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Decreases Access to High-quality Livers

Despite the revolutionary role of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the treatment timing for liver transplant candidates remains controversial. We hypothesize that deferring treatment until after liver transplantation improves access to a larger and higher-quality donor pool with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation direct 2021-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e684-e684
Hauptverfasser: Strauss, Alexandra T., Ishaque, Tanveen, Weeks, Sharon, Hamilton, James P., Simsek, Cem, Durand, Christine M., Massie, Allan B., Segev, Dorry L., Gurakar, Ahmet, Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite the revolutionary role of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the treatment timing for liver transplant candidates remains controversial. We hypothesize that deferring treatment until after liver transplantation improves access to a larger and higher-quality donor pool without a detrimental impact on post-liver transplantation outcomes. This single-center study includes recipients that underwent deceased-donor liver transplant with HCV as the primary indication January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. For recipients that were untreated (n = 87) versus treated (n = 42) pre-LT, we compared post-LT mortality using Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment-weighted data. Among pre-LT untreated recipients, 95% were willing to accept an HCV+ donor, and 44.8% received a positive HCV antibody and nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) liver. Among pre-LT treated recipients, 5% were willing to accept an HCV+ donor, and 100% received a negative HCV antibody and NAT liver. The median calculated model for end-stage liver disease at transplant was similar between pre-LT untreated (13, IQR = 9-22) and treated recipients (11, IQR = 8-14) (  = 0.1). Pre-LT treated recipients received livers from older (47 y old versus 37,  
ISSN:2373-8731
2373-8731
DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001127