Selection of numerical method for solving ordinary differential equation systems for a high-speed model of hydrocarbons steam cracking
Relevance. Caused by the need to increase production of light olefins. The use of advanced process control systems and Real–Time Optimization makes it possible to increase the efficiency of steam cracking plants, but requires a high-speed mathematical model of the process. Aim. To select a method fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Izvestiâ Tomskogo politehničeskogo universiteta. Inžiniring georesursov 2024-01, Vol.335 (1), p.202-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Relevance. Caused by the need to increase production of light olefins. The use of advanced process control systems and Real–Time Optimization makes it possible to increase the efficiency of steam cracking plants, but requires a high-speed mathematical model of the process. Aim. To select a method for numerical solution of systems of ordinary differential equations, which provides the highest speed when calculating the reaction coil of a steam cracking furnace. Reducing the time spent on calculating each scenario will allow the proposed model to be used for real-time process optimization tasks. Object. Mathematical model of ethane steam cracking, numerical methods for ordinary differential equations systems solution. Methods. System analysis, mathematical modeling. To solve the ordinary differential equations systems, various explicit numerical methods were used, differing in approach to integration step determination. Results. The authors have developed and tested a steady-state model of ethane steam cracking. The developed model was used to compare the calculation time required for solving ordinary differential equations systems using different numerical methods. It was demonstrated, that the use of an adaptive integration step reduces calculation time by more than 20 times (from more than 11 hours to 34 minutes) while maintaining the accuracy of calculations. This is due to different reaction rates through the length of the reaction coil – in areas of high temperatures and high concentrations of reagents, a reduction in the integration step is required to obtain the desired accuracy. And in low reaction rates areas an increase in the step and reduction in the total calculated iterations are acceptable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2500-1019 2413-1830 |
DOI: | 10.18799/24131830/2024/1/4364 |