Positive Lymph Node Ratio as a new prognostic score in Geriatric patients with operated gastric cancer
The pivotal prognostic determinant for recurrence and survival in surgically treated gastric cancer (GC) patients remains the lymph node status. Despite the adoption of D2 lymph node dissection as the standard approach in recent years, its association with increased morbidity in elderly patients rai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heliyon 2024-10, Vol.10 (19), p.e38809, Article e38809 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The pivotal prognostic determinant for recurrence and survival in surgically treated gastric cancer (GC) patients remains the lymph node status. Despite the adoption of D2 lymph node dissection as the standard approach in recent years, its association with increased morbidity in elderly patients raises concerns. This study aims to explore the prognostic significance of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio (PLNR) score in the context of recurrence and survival among elderly patients with surgically treated GC.
A retrospective review of files about surgically treated patients with GC was conducted. The prognostic impact of the PLNR score on overall survival (OS) was assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.
The cut-off value for the PLNR, determined through ROC analysis, was identified as 0.138. This value serves as a crucial threshold, as it distinguishes patients with a higher risk of poor outcomes. Patients with a PLNR score of 0.138 or below exhibited a median OS of 111 months, whereas those with a PLNR score above 0.138 had a significantly lower median OS of 22 months (p = 0.004).
Our findings revealed that the PLNR emerged as an independent predictor of survival and recurrence in patients undergoing GC resection.However, it's important to note that while valuable, the PLNR system has limitations. It does not encompass the T stage, a key factor in cancer staging. Therefore, it cannot be a direct substitute for the comprehensive information TNM staging provides. It should be used as a supplementary tool in predicting prognosis, particularly in elderly patients unsuitable for standard lymph node dissection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-8440 2405-8440 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38809 |