Prediction Challenges From Errors in Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Trends
Models in the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) predict sea surface temperature (SST) trends in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean which are more positive than those observed over the period 1982–2020. These trend errors are accompanied by linear trends in the squared error of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in climate 2022-03, Vol.4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Models in the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) predict sea surface temperature (SST) trends in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean which are more positive than those observed over the period 1982–2020. These trend errors are accompanied by linear trends in the squared error of SST forecasts whose sign is determined by the mean model bias (cold equatorial bias is linked to negative trends in squared error and vice versa). The reason for this behavior is that the overly positive trend reduces the bias of models that are too cold and increases the bias of models that are too warm. The excessive positive SST trends in the models are also linked with overly positive trends in tropical precipitation anomalies. Larger (smaller) SST trend errors are associated with lower (higher) skill in predicting precipitation anomalies over the central Pacific Ocean. Errors in the linear SST trend do not explain a large percentage of variability in precipitation anomaly errors, but do account for large errors in amplitude. The predictions toward a too warm and wet tropical Pacific, especially since 2000, are strongly correlated with an increase in El Niño false alarms. These results may be relevant for interpreting the behavior of uninitialized CMIP5/6 models, which project SST trends that resemble the NMME trend errors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2624-9553 2624-9553 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fclim.2022.837483 |