Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations
Physics Education Research _PER_ practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physics 2008, Vol.76 (1), p.79-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | American journal of physics |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Henderson, C Dancy, M. H |
description | Physics Education Research _PER_ practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation, interviews were conducted with five likely users of physics education research. All reported making changes in their instructional practices and all were influenced, to some extent, by educational research. Yet, none made full use of educational research and most had complaints about their interactions with educational researchers. In this paper we examine how these instructors used educational research in making instructional decisions and identify divergent expectations about how researchers and faculty can work together to improve student learning. Although different instructors emphasized different aspects of this discrepancy between expectations, we believe that they are all related to a single underlying issue: the typical dissemination model is to disseminate curricular innovations and have faculty adopt them with minimal changes, while faculty expect researchers to work with them to incorporate research-based knowledge and materials into their unique instructional situations. Implications and recommendations are discussed. © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1119/1.2800352 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_dipf_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dipf_primary_820224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1404744841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-5ee55cd28878afe61c5bcb7c4782eb324899e08445862bf187c64ec58c4a0fa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqd0E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB6-egjeFrkmatIk3WT9hQQ96Dmk6cbOsTU3axf33Vrvg3dMwzMMw8yJ0SsmMUqqu6IxJQnLB9tCEKp5nTBG1jyaEEJYpQcQhOkppNbSKSjJB4WW5Td4m7Izt190Wm6bGUPfWdD40Zo0jJDDRLiGma3zrNxDfoekwfLVgu1-UsEm4MjH6weAu4G4JuPbO9WmY4uCwb5qwGe0xOnBmneBkV6fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnuY3i8zmknSZABDC1kzKUhoHBbWislVpeSkZVDnjUikgknMhC1Y5KktbcLBCWm6IMyqfovNxbxvDZw-p06vQx-GhpBktSsIKwQZ0MSIbQ0oRnG6j_zBxqynRP3FqqndxDvZytMn68e__4U2If1C3tRvw2Yhr3_5dIBlhjOffyhiNxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216702652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Henderson, C ; Dancy, M. H</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderson, C ; Dancy, M. H</creatorcontrib><description>Physics Education Research _PER_ practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation, interviews were conducted with five likely users of physics education research. All reported making changes in their instructional practices and all were influenced, to some extent, by educational research. Yet, none made full use of educational research and most had complaints about their interactions with educational researchers. In this paper we examine how these instructors used educational research in making instructional decisions and identify divergent expectations about how researchers and faculty can work together to improve student learning. Although different instructors emphasized different aspects of this discrepancy between expectations, we believe that they are all related to a single underlying issue: the typical dissemination model is to disseminate curricular innovations and have faculty adopt them with minimal changes, while faculty expect researchers to work with them to incorporate research-based knowledge and materials into their unique instructional situations. Implications and recommendations are discussed. © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2909</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1119/1.2800352</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPIAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Woodbury: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Akzeptanz ; Curricula ; Curriculum development ; Dissemination ; Fachdidaktik ; Forschung ; Hochschuldidaktik ; Physics ; Physik ; School faculty ; Science education</subject><ispartof>American journal of physics, 2008, Vol.76 (1), p.79-91</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physics Teachers</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Physics Jan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-5ee55cd28878afe61c5bcb7c4782eb324899e08445862bf187c64ec58c4a0fa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-5ee55cd28878afe61c5bcb7c4782eb324899e08445862bf187c64ec58c4a0fa93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/ajp/article-lookup/doi/10.1119/1.2800352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4010,4498,27900,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=820224$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dancy, M. H</creatorcontrib><title>Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations</title><title>American journal of physics</title><description>Physics Education Research _PER_ practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation, interviews were conducted with five likely users of physics education research. All reported making changes in their instructional practices and all were influenced, to some extent, by educational research. Yet, none made full use of educational research and most had complaints about their interactions with educational researchers. In this paper we examine how these instructors used educational research in making instructional decisions and identify divergent expectations about how researchers and faculty can work together to improve student learning. Although different instructors emphasized different aspects of this discrepancy between expectations, we believe that they are all related to a single underlying issue: the typical dissemination model is to disseminate curricular innovations and have faculty adopt them with minimal changes, while faculty expect researchers to work with them to incorporate research-based knowledge and materials into their unique instructional situations. Implications and recommendations are discussed. © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.</description><subject>Akzeptanz</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum development</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Fachdidaktik</subject><subject>Forschung</subject><subject>Hochschuldidaktik</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physik</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>Science education</subject><issn>0002-9505</issn><issn>1943-2909</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqd0E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rB6-egjeFrkmatIk3WT9hQQ96Dmk6cbOsTU3axf33Vrvg3dMwzMMw8yJ0SsmMUqqu6IxJQnLB9tCEKp5nTBG1jyaEEJYpQcQhOkppNbSKSjJB4WW5Td4m7Izt190Wm6bGUPfWdD40Zo0jJDDRLiGma3zrNxDfoekwfLVgu1-UsEm4MjH6weAu4G4JuPbO9WmY4uCwb5qwGe0xOnBmneBkV6fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnuY3i8zmknSZABDC1kzKUhoHBbWislVpeSkZVDnjUikgknMhC1Y5KktbcLBCWm6IMyqfovNxbxvDZw-p06vQx-GhpBktSsIKwQZ0MSIbQ0oRnG6j_zBxqynRP3FqqndxDvZytMn68e__4U2If1C3tRvw2Yhr3_5dIBlhjOffyhiNxw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Henderson, C</creator><creator>Dancy, M. H</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations</title><author>Henderson, C ; Dancy, M. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-5ee55cd28878afe61c5bcb7c4782eb324899e08445862bf187c64ec58c4a0fa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Akzeptanz</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum development</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Fachdidaktik</topic><topic>Forschung</topic><topic>Hochschuldidaktik</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physik</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>Science education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dancy, M. H</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American journal of physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderson, C</au><au>Dancy, M. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physics</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>79-91</pages><issn>0002-9505</issn><eissn>1943-2909</eissn><coden>AJPIAS</coden><abstract>Physics Education Research _PER_ practitioners have engaged in substantial curriculum development and dissemination work in recent years. Yet, it appears that this work has had minimal influence on the fundamental teaching practices of the typical physics faculty. To better understand this situation, interviews were conducted with five likely users of physics education research. All reported making changes in their instructional practices and all were influenced, to some extent, by educational research. Yet, none made full use of educational research and most had complaints about their interactions with educational researchers. In this paper we examine how these instructors used educational research in making instructional decisions and identify divergent expectations about how researchers and faculty can work together to improve student learning. Although different instructors emphasized different aspects of this discrepancy between expectations, we believe that they are all related to a single underlying issue: the typical dissemination model is to disseminate curricular innovations and have faculty adopt them with minimal changes, while faculty expect researchers to work with them to incorporate research-based knowledge and materials into their unique instructional situations. Implications and recommendations are discussed. © 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.</abstract><cop>Woodbury</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1119/1.2800352</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9505 |
ispartof | American journal of physics, 2008, Vol.76 (1), p.79-91 |
issn | 0002-9505 1943-2909 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dipf_primary_820224 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Akzeptanz Curricula Curriculum development Dissemination Fachdidaktik Forschung Hochschuldidaktik Physics Physik School faculty Science education |
title | Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_dipf_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physics%20faculty%20and%20educational%20researchers:%20Divergent%20expectations%20as%20barriers%20to%20the%20diffusion%20of%20innovations&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physics&rft.au=Henderson,%20C&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=79-91&rft.issn=0002-9505&rft.eissn=1943-2909&rft.coden=AJPIAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1119/1.2800352&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_dipf_%3E1404744841%3C/proquest_dipf_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216702652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |