Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity

This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Higher education quarterly 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240
1. Verfasser: Ainley, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 225
container_title Higher education quarterly
container_volume 68
creator Ainley, Patrick
description This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hequ.12038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dipf</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dipf_primary_1044323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1044323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dipf_primary_10443233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9irsOgjAYRhujiXhZXF36AIK9yWUmGmfjTor8SA0UbIuRt5dBV7_l5OR8CG0oCei4fQXPPqCM8HiCPCrC2Gcs4lPkERZyP4nCZI4W1j4IOSRhIjyUXto8V9piAw00ORgosNQFLpT9-Q7fWu3g7XpZK6v0HbsKxpNWLzBWuWGFZqWsLay_XKLt6XhNz36hujLrjGqkGTJKhOCM8__1A-fKOto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Ainley, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-9769</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0951-5224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12038</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Ausland ; Großbritannien ; Hochschule ; Hochschulsystem ; Staat</subject><ispartof>Higher education quarterly, 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1044323$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><title>Higher education quarterly</title><description>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Großbritannien</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Hochschulsystem</subject><subject>Staat</subject><issn>0263-9769</issn><issn>0951-5224</issn><issn>1468-2273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9irsOgjAYRhujiXhZXF36AIK9yWUmGmfjTor8SA0UbIuRt5dBV7_l5OR8CG0oCei4fQXPPqCM8HiCPCrC2Gcs4lPkERZyP4nCZI4W1j4IOSRhIjyUXto8V9piAw00ORgosNQFLpT9-Q7fWu3g7XpZK6v0HbsKxpNWLzBWuWGFZqWsLay_XKLt6XhNz36hujLrjGqkGTJKhOCM8__1A-fKOto</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Ainley, Patrick</creator><scope>9S6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><author>Ainley, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dipf_primary_10443233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Großbritannien</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Hochschulsystem</topic><topic>Staat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><jtitle>Higher education quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ainley, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</atitle><jtitle>Higher education quarterly</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>225-240</pages><issn>0263-9769</issn><issn>0951-5224</issn><eissn>1468-2273</eissn><abstract>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><doi>10.1111/hequ.12038</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-9769
ispartof Higher education quarterly, 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240
issn 0263-9769
0951-5224
1468-2273
language eng
recordid cdi_dipf_primary_1044323
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Education Source
subjects Ausland
Großbritannien
Hochschule
Hochschulsystem
Staat
title Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dipf&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robbins%20remembered%20and%20dismembered,%20contextualising%20the%20anniversity&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education%20quarterly&rft.au=Ainley,%20Patrick&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=225-240&rft.issn=0263-9769&rft.eissn=1468-2273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hequ.12038&rft_dat=%3Cdipf%3E1044323%3C/dipf%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true