Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity
This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Higher education quarterly 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | Higher education quarterly |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Ainley, Patrick |
description | This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/hequ.12038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dipf</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dipf_primary_1044323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1044323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dipf_primary_10443233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9irsOgjAYRhujiXhZXF36AIK9yWUmGmfjTor8SA0UbIuRt5dBV7_l5OR8CG0oCei4fQXPPqCM8HiCPCrC2Gcs4lPkERZyP4nCZI4W1j4IOSRhIjyUXto8V9piAw00ORgosNQFLpT9-Q7fWu3g7XpZK6v0HbsKxpNWLzBWuWGFZqWsLay_XKLt6XhNz36hujLrjGqkGTJKhOCM8__1A-fKOto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Ainley, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-9769</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0951-5224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12038</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Ausland ; Großbritannien ; Hochschule ; Hochschulsystem ; Staat</subject><ispartof>Higher education quarterly, 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1044323$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><title>Higher education quarterly</title><description>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Großbritannien</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Hochschulsystem</subject><subject>Staat</subject><issn>0263-9769</issn><issn>0951-5224</issn><issn>1468-2273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9irsOgjAYRhujiXhZXF36AIK9yWUmGmfjTor8SA0UbIuRt5dBV7_l5OR8CG0oCei4fQXPPqCM8HiCPCrC2Gcs4lPkERZyP4nCZI4W1j4IOSRhIjyUXto8V9piAw00ORgosNQFLpT9-Q7fWu3g7XpZK6v0HbsKxpNWLzBWuWGFZqWsLay_XKLt6XhNz36hujLrjGqkGTJKhOCM8__1A-fKOto</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Ainley, Patrick</creator><scope>9S6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</title><author>Ainley, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dipf_primary_10443233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Großbritannien</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Hochschulsystem</topic><topic>Staat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ainley, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><jtitle>Higher education quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ainley, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity</atitle><jtitle>Higher education quarterly</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>225-240</pages><issn>0263-9769</issn><issn>0951-5224</issn><eissn>1468-2273</eissn><abstract>This polemical paper was motivated by its author's concern that the United Kingdom Coalition higher education minister, Willetts, should claim at recent quinquageniary commemorations of the publication of the 1963 Robbins Report to be preserving its legacy for higher education. By contrast, this paper argues that the period of reform aimed at changing society through education marked by Robbins has been closed by the Coalition government's acceptance of the 2010 Browne Review recommendations. The paper is therefore little concerned with the contents of the report but places it in a wider context ending in the current attempted reversal towards a minority higher education with academic schooling dominant throughout the system. In a still greater reversal, the expansion of state over private provision characteristic of the 50-year period of reform of education, is also being reversed towards a state-subsidised privatisation at all levels of learning. In conclusion some alternatives are suggested. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><doi>10.1111/hequ.12038</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-9769 |
ispartof | Higher education quarterly, 2014, Vol.68 (2), p.225-240 |
issn | 0263-9769 0951-5224 1468-2273 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dipf_primary_1044323 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Education Source |
subjects | Ausland Großbritannien Hochschule Hochschulsystem Staat |
title | Robbins remembered and dismembered, contextualising the anniversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dipf&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robbins%20remembered%20and%20dismembered,%20contextualising%20the%20anniversity&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education%20quarterly&rft.au=Ainley,%20Patrick&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=225-240&rft.issn=0263-9769&rft.eissn=1468-2273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hequ.12038&rft_dat=%3Cdipf%3E1044323%3C/dipf%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |