The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx

Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Con-textos kantianos 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133
1. Verfasser: Clayton Jr, Eugene
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue
container_start_page 127
container_title Con-textos kantianos
container_volume 18
creator Clayton Jr, Eugene
description Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.
doi_str_mv 10.5209/kant.88890
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_dialn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001649788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04556499v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWLQXP0GuSluTbP6Cl1LUihVB1nNIk0m7dd2U3VXst3fXquhlZni834N5CJ1RMhGMmMsXV7UTrbUhB2jAMi3HSgpx-Oc-RsOm2RBCqOIsI3SAaL4GPEuVh22LU8Q5lJDKtNrhosL3XeAIz2EF5Qi7KuAHV3-coqPoygaG3_sEPd9c57P5ePF4ezebLsaeKdV2ExTnzEcFnvvIliLqEPVSUi-pcUIGalRgnvogtQSqpQsZF9FEx6hc8uwEXe1zQ-HKClq7rYtXV-9scoX90d6qoi7Sxllo7PQp7z-T3CitO_x8j69d-Q-dTxe21wgXovOad9p5L_ZeX6emqSH-ApTYvlrbV2u_qs0-Adxeamw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><source>Dialnet</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creator><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><description>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2386-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2386-7655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5209/kant.88890</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Capital ; Hegel ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Kant ; Marx ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Teleology</subject><ispartof>Con-textos kantianos, 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,870,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04556499$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><title>Con-textos kantianos</title><description>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Hegel</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Kant</subject><subject>Marx</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><issn>2386-7655</issn><issn>2386-7655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWLQXP0GuSluTbP6Cl1LUihVB1nNIk0m7dd2U3VXst3fXquhlZni834N5CJ1RMhGMmMsXV7UTrbUhB2jAMi3HSgpx-Oc-RsOm2RBCqOIsI3SAaL4GPEuVh22LU8Q5lJDKtNrhosL3XeAIz2EF5Qi7KuAHV3-coqPoygaG3_sEPd9c57P5ePF4ezebLsaeKdV2ExTnzEcFnvvIliLqEPVSUi-pcUIGalRgnvogtQSqpQsZF9FEx6hc8uwEXe1zQ-HKClq7rYtXV-9scoX90d6qoi7Sxllo7PQp7z-T3CitO_x8j69d-Q-dTxe21wgXovOad9p5L_ZeX6emqSH-ApTYvlrbV2u_qs0-Adxeamw</recordid><startdate>20231212</startdate><enddate>20231212</enddate><creator>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231212</creationdate><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><author>Clayton Jr, Eugene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Hegel</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Kant</topic><topic>Marx</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>Con-textos kantianos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clayton Jr, Eugene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</atitle><jtitle>Con-textos kantianos</jtitle><date>2023-12-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>127-133</pages><issn>2386-7655</issn><eissn>2386-7655</eissn><abstract>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</abstract><doi>10.5209/kant.88890</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2386-7655
ispartof Con-textos kantianos, 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133
issn 2386-7655
2386-7655
language eng
recordid cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001649788
source Dialnet; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Capital
Hegel
Humanities and Social Sciences
Kant
Marx
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Teleology
title The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_dialn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Teleology%20in%20Kant,%20Hegel,%20and%20Marx&rft.jtitle=Con-textos%20kantianos&rft.au=Clayton%20Jr,%20Eugene&rft.date=2023-12-12&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=127-133&rft.issn=2386-7655&rft.eissn=2386-7655&rft_id=info:doi/10.5209/kant.88890&rft_dat=%3Chal_dialn%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04556499v1%3C/hal_dialn%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true