The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx
Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Con-textos kantianos 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 133 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Con-textos kantianos |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Clayton Jr, Eugene |
description | Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5209/kant.88890 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_dialn</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001649788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04556499v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWLQXP0GuSluTbP6Cl1LUihVB1nNIk0m7dd2U3VXst3fXquhlZni834N5CJ1RMhGMmMsXV7UTrbUhB2jAMi3HSgpx-Oc-RsOm2RBCqOIsI3SAaL4GPEuVh22LU8Q5lJDKtNrhosL3XeAIz2EF5Qi7KuAHV3-coqPoygaG3_sEPd9c57P5ePF4ezebLsaeKdV2ExTnzEcFnvvIliLqEPVSUi-pcUIGalRgnvogtQSqpQsZF9FEx6hc8uwEXe1zQ-HKClq7rYtXV-9scoX90d6qoi7Sxllo7PQp7z-T3CitO_x8j69d-Q-dTxe21wgXovOad9p5L_ZeX6emqSH-ApTYvlrbV2u_qs0-Adxeamw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><source>Dialnet</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creator><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><description>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2386-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2386-7655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5209/kant.88890</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Capital ; Hegel ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Kant ; Marx ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Teleology</subject><ispartof>Con-textos kantianos, 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,870,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04556499$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><title>Con-textos kantianos</title><description>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Hegel</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Kant</subject><subject>Marx</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Teleology</subject><issn>2386-7655</issn><issn>2386-7655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMoWLQXP0GuSluTbP6Cl1LUihVB1nNIk0m7dd2U3VXst3fXquhlZni834N5CJ1RMhGMmMsXV7UTrbUhB2jAMi3HSgpx-Oc-RsOm2RBCqOIsI3SAaL4GPEuVh22LU8Q5lJDKtNrhosL3XeAIz2EF5Qi7KuAHV3-coqPoygaG3_sEPd9c57P5ePF4ezebLsaeKdV2ExTnzEcFnvvIliLqEPVSUi-pcUIGalRgnvogtQSqpQsZF9FEx6hc8uwEXe1zQ-HKClq7rYtXV-9scoX90d6qoi7Sxllo7PQp7z-T3CitO_x8j69d-Q-dTxe21wgXovOad9p5L_ZeX6emqSH-ApTYvlrbV2u_qs0-Adxeamw</recordid><startdate>20231212</startdate><enddate>20231212</enddate><creator>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231212</creationdate><title>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</title><author>Clayton Jr, Eugene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-c2e7442cf7ec4cf2b5f8df8b61c619a56d197d2c1cd686e186ad345f9fa216b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Hegel</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Kant</topic><topic>Marx</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Teleology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clayton Jr, Eugene</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>Con-textos kantianos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clayton Jr, Eugene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx</atitle><jtitle>Con-textos kantianos</jtitle><date>2023-12-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>127-133</pages><issn>2386-7655</issn><eissn>2386-7655</eissn><abstract>Breaking with Aristotle’s Physics, Kant effects a theoretical reconception of teleology. It is this paper’s contention that the truth of the Kantian conception of teleology as ‘a purposiveness of nature in behalf of our faculty for cognizing it’ is not that of being a solution to Hume’s problem of induction or the condition for the possibility of subjective cognition of the empirical, but that it is a theoretical means of the subjective domination over the objective. A materialist reading of Hegel’s criticism of Kant’s antinomy of teleological judgment in the Science of Logic is then proposed. Finally, the non-teleological nature of capital is demonstrated.</abstract><doi>10.5209/kant.88890</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2386-7655 |
ispartof | Con-textos kantianos, 2023-12, Vol.18, p.127-133 |
issn | 2386-7655 2386-7655 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001649788 |
source | Dialnet; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Capital Hegel Humanities and Social Sciences Kant Marx Metaphysics Philosophy Teleology |
title | The Concept of Teleology in Kant, Hegel, and Marx |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_dialn&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20Teleology%20in%20Kant,%20Hegel,%20and%20Marx&rft.jtitle=Con-textos%20kantianos&rft.au=Clayton%20Jr,%20Eugene&rft.date=2023-12-12&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=127-133&rft.issn=2386-7655&rft.eissn=2386-7655&rft_id=info:doi/10.5209/kant.88890&rft_dat=%3Chal_dialn%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04556499v1%3C/hal_dialn%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |