Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees

Trophy Hunting (TH) is thought to be the reason for the reduction in length and thickness of trophies as well as body size in several Bovidae species. In deer populations, changes have occurred in allele frequencies and in number of antler tips, possibly the result of the removal of males that showe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Galemys (Malaga) 2019-12, Vol.31, p.27-34
Hauptverfasser: García-Ferrer, David, Herrero, Juan, Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar, Arnal, Mari Cruz, García-Serrano, Alicia, Fernández de Luco, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue
container_start_page 27
container_title Galemys (Malaga)
container_volume 31
creator García-Ferrer, David
Herrero, Juan
Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar
Arnal, Mari Cruz
García-Serrano, Alicia
Fernández de Luco, Daniel
description Trophy Hunting (TH) is thought to be the reason for the reduction in length and thickness of trophies as well as body size in several Bovidae species. In deer populations, changes have occurred in allele frequencies and in number of antler tips, possibly the result of the removal of males that showed the best trophies. To evaluate whether TH selection occurred in a roe deer population, we compared the antlers and body biometrics of bucks harvested (n=278, 2006-2014) through stalking with a ranger within Game Reserves in the Aragonese Pyrenees (Spain) and those of non-hunted bucks found dead in the same and surrounding areas (n=28, 2004-2014); the latter were necropsied. For the analyses, hunters were assigned to one of three categories: local, regional, or national, depending on the origin and access to the hunting permissions. The study assessed the selection perception and hunt difficulty among rangers (n=18) and hunters (n=209). Statistical analyses used non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The results indicated that (i), in all biometrics except brow tines, hunted bucks were larger than the non-hunted ones, (ii) hunter typologies did not differ, and (iii) rangers and hunters did not differ in their perceptions of selection and difficulty. Our results suggest that, the roe deer hunt through stalking in the Game Reserves selected the best trophies, and the rangers were essential in that process. Furthermore, if the main objective of roe deer TH is to harvest the animals with larger antlers, this selection could have a long-term negative impact.
doi_str_mv 10.7325/Galemys.2019.A3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dialnet_FKZ</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001612585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001612585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c935-e2345fbe9d77a1a0f149bbd09cdb00c212ee5021a21ef3bb828b36d418ca78e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYRoMoOOauvc0f6PYmaZYUBClDpzBQZPchH29dpGsl6YT-ezc2vXrgwHkuDiH3DOZKcLlY2xb3Y55zYNW8FldkwrksC12CviYTxoQqtAK4JbOcowPGNV-KUk9IvbIdTT3SgJjo7tANsfukDmnGFv0Qf_CR1tTbfCTDIYy0Sf2eDjuk72PCDjHfkZvGthlnl52S7fPTdvVSbN7Wr6t6U_hKyAK5KGXjsApKWWahYWXlXIDKBwfgOeOIEjiznGEjnNNcO7EMJdPeKo1KTMnD-TZE23Y4mO8U9zaNprfR_LFDF1Psv6zBbOqPLQCwJeNSy6O-OOs-9TknbP59BuaU0FwSmlNCUwvxC-VpZiE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees</title><source>Dialnet</source><creator>García-Ferrer, David ; Herrero, Juan ; Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar ; Arnal, Mari Cruz ; García-Serrano, Alicia ; Fernández de Luco, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Ferrer, David ; Herrero, Juan ; Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar ; Arnal, Mari Cruz ; García-Serrano, Alicia ; Fernández de Luco, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Trophy Hunting (TH) is thought to be the reason for the reduction in length and thickness of trophies as well as body size in several Bovidae species. In deer populations, changes have occurred in allele frequencies and in number of antler tips, possibly the result of the removal of males that showed the best trophies. To evaluate whether TH selection occurred in a roe deer population, we compared the antlers and body biometrics of bucks harvested (n=278, 2006-2014) through stalking with a ranger within Game Reserves in the Aragonese Pyrenees (Spain) and those of non-hunted bucks found dead in the same and surrounding areas (n=28, 2004-2014); the latter were necropsied. For the analyses, hunters were assigned to one of three categories: local, regional, or national, depending on the origin and access to the hunting permissions. The study assessed the selection perception and hunt difficulty among rangers (n=18) and hunters (n=209). Statistical analyses used non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The results indicated that (i), in all biometrics except brow tines, hunted bucks were larger than the non-hunted ones, (ii) hunter typologies did not differ, and (iii) rangers and hunters did not differ in their perceptions of selection and difficulty. Our results suggest that, the roe deer hunt through stalking in the Game Reserves selected the best trophies, and the rangers were essential in that process. Furthermore, if the main objective of roe deer TH is to harvest the animals with larger antlers, this selection could have a long-term negative impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1137-8700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2254-8408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7325/Galemys.2019.A3</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Capreolus capreolus ; Caza de Trofeo ; Game Reserves ; guarda ; hunt perception ; hunter typology ; percepción de la caza ; ranger ; Reservas de Caza ; tipología de cazador ; Trophy Hunt</subject><ispartof>Galemys (Malaga), 2019-12, Vol.31, p.27-34</ispartof><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,870,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7207556$$EView_record_in_Universidad_de_la_Rioja$$FView_record_in_$$GUniversidad_de_la_Rioja$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Ferrer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnal, Mari Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Serrano, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández de Luco, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees</title><title>Galemys (Malaga)</title><description>Trophy Hunting (TH) is thought to be the reason for the reduction in length and thickness of trophies as well as body size in several Bovidae species. In deer populations, changes have occurred in allele frequencies and in number of antler tips, possibly the result of the removal of males that showed the best trophies. To evaluate whether TH selection occurred in a roe deer population, we compared the antlers and body biometrics of bucks harvested (n=278, 2006-2014) through stalking with a ranger within Game Reserves in the Aragonese Pyrenees (Spain) and those of non-hunted bucks found dead in the same and surrounding areas (n=28, 2004-2014); the latter were necropsied. For the analyses, hunters were assigned to one of three categories: local, regional, or national, depending on the origin and access to the hunting permissions. The study assessed the selection perception and hunt difficulty among rangers (n=18) and hunters (n=209). Statistical analyses used non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The results indicated that (i), in all biometrics except brow tines, hunted bucks were larger than the non-hunted ones, (ii) hunter typologies did not differ, and (iii) rangers and hunters did not differ in their perceptions of selection and difficulty. Our results suggest that, the roe deer hunt through stalking in the Game Reserves selected the best trophies, and the rangers were essential in that process. Furthermore, if the main objective of roe deer TH is to harvest the animals with larger antlers, this selection could have a long-term negative impact.</description><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>Caza de Trofeo</subject><subject>Game Reserves</subject><subject>guarda</subject><subject>hunt perception</subject><subject>hunter typology</subject><subject>percepción de la caza</subject><subject>ranger</subject><subject>Reservas de Caza</subject><subject>tipología de cazador</subject><subject>Trophy Hunt</subject><issn>1137-8700</issn><issn>2254-8408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYRoMoOOauvc0f6PYmaZYUBClDpzBQZPchH29dpGsl6YT-ezc2vXrgwHkuDiH3DOZKcLlY2xb3Y55zYNW8FldkwrksC12CviYTxoQqtAK4JbOcowPGNV-KUk9IvbIdTT3SgJjo7tANsfukDmnGFv0Qf_CR1tTbfCTDIYy0Sf2eDjuk72PCDjHfkZvGthlnl52S7fPTdvVSbN7Wr6t6U_hKyAK5KGXjsApKWWahYWXlXIDKBwfgOeOIEjiznGEjnNNcO7EMJdPeKo1KTMnD-TZE23Y4mO8U9zaNprfR_LFDF1Psv6zBbOqPLQCwJeNSy6O-OOs-9TknbP59BuaU0FwSmlNCUwvxC-VpZiE</recordid><startdate>20191231</startdate><enddate>20191231</enddate><creator>García-Ferrer, David</creator><creator>Herrero, Juan</creator><creator>Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar</creator><creator>Arnal, Mari Cruz</creator><creator>García-Serrano, Alicia</creator><creator>Fernández de Luco, Daniel</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191231</creationdate><title>Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees</title><author>García-Ferrer, David ; Herrero, Juan ; Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar ; Arnal, Mari Cruz ; García-Serrano, Alicia ; Fernández de Luco, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c935-e2345fbe9d77a1a0f149bbd09cdb00c212ee5021a21ef3bb828b36d418ca78e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>Caza de Trofeo</topic><topic>Game Reserves</topic><topic>guarda</topic><topic>hunt perception</topic><topic>hunter typology</topic><topic>percepción de la caza</topic><topic>ranger</topic><topic>Reservas de Caza</topic><topic>tipología de cazador</topic><topic>Trophy Hunt</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Ferrer, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnal, Mari Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Serrano, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández de Luco, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><jtitle>Galemys (Malaga)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Ferrer, David</au><au>Herrero, Juan</au><au>Jimeno-Brabo, Pilar</au><au>Arnal, Mari Cruz</au><au>García-Serrano, Alicia</au><au>Fernández de Luco, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees</atitle><jtitle>Galemys (Malaga)</jtitle><date>2019-12-31</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>27</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>27-34</pages><issn>1137-8700</issn><eissn>2254-8408</eissn><abstract>Trophy Hunting (TH) is thought to be the reason for the reduction in length and thickness of trophies as well as body size in several Bovidae species. In deer populations, changes have occurred in allele frequencies and in number of antler tips, possibly the result of the removal of males that showed the best trophies. To evaluate whether TH selection occurred in a roe deer population, we compared the antlers and body biometrics of bucks harvested (n=278, 2006-2014) through stalking with a ranger within Game Reserves in the Aragonese Pyrenees (Spain) and those of non-hunted bucks found dead in the same and surrounding areas (n=28, 2004-2014); the latter were necropsied. For the analyses, hunters were assigned to one of three categories: local, regional, or national, depending on the origin and access to the hunting permissions. The study assessed the selection perception and hunt difficulty among rangers (n=18) and hunters (n=209). Statistical analyses used non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The results indicated that (i), in all biometrics except brow tines, hunted bucks were larger than the non-hunted ones, (ii) hunter typologies did not differ, and (iii) rangers and hunters did not differ in their perceptions of selection and difficulty. Our results suggest that, the roe deer hunt through stalking in the Game Reserves selected the best trophies, and the rangers were essential in that process. Furthermore, if the main objective of roe deer TH is to harvest the animals with larger antlers, this selection could have a long-term negative impact.</abstract><doi>10.7325/Galemys.2019.A3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1137-8700
ispartof Galemys (Malaga), 2019-12, Vol.31, p.27-34
issn 1137-8700
2254-8408
language eng
recordid cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001612585
source Dialnet
subjects Capreolus capreolus
Caza de Trofeo
Game Reserves
guarda
hunt perception
hunter typology
percepción de la caza
ranger
Reservas de Caza
tipología de cazador
Trophy Hunt
title Can roe deer hunting be selective? A case study from the Pyrenees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dialnet_FKZ&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20roe%20deer%20hunting%20be%20selective?%20A%20case%20study%20from%20the%20Pyrenees&rft.jtitle=Galemys%20(Malaga)&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Ferrer,%20David&rft.date=2019-12-31&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=27-34&rft.issn=1137-8700&rft.eissn=2254-8408&rft_id=info:doi/10.7325/Galemys.2019.A3&rft_dat=%3Cdialnet_FKZ%3Eoai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001612585%3C/dialnet_FKZ%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true