Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability
Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) present cognitive deficits interfering with the motor learning process. Objective: To analyze the motor learning of children with intellectual disability (ID) and compare with typically developing children. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 children...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Retos (Madrid) 2023-01, Vol.49 (49), p.807-812 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 812 |
---|---|
container_issue | 49 |
container_start_page | 807 |
container_title | Retos (Madrid) |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge Alane Silva, Érica Silva Guedes, Marília |
description | Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) present cognitive deficits interfering with the motor learning process. Objective: To analyze the motor learning of children with intellectual disability (ID) and compare with typically developing children. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 children of both genders (10 with ID and aged 8.5±1.57 years). The experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups were composed of children with and without ID, respectively. We used a maze task printed on a paper sheet (A4 size). Ten attempts were performed on the first day: five for the acquisition 1 (A1) and five for the acquisition 2 (A2) phase. Five attempts were also performed 48 hours later for the retention phase (RET). Results: The results related to the motor learning phases were lower in the EG compared with CG (p < 0.01). Within-group comparisons showed no significant differences between the outcomes. Children in the EG maintained the score in the A1 and A2 phases and declined in the RET phase, while the CG maintained the same scores over the three phases. Conclusion: Children with ID presented lower performance in the maze task than typically developing children. It seems that motor learning is slower in individuals with ID than controls, and they need more time and repetitions to learn the maze task.
Key words: Child development, Intellectual disability, Motor activity, Learning, Motor task |
doi_str_mv | 10.47197/retos.v49.98355 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dialnet_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001606405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6b034e7433de446ea6e1552623fc8bb6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001606405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3d641742d6bc4da553448dc3f9823f8ba839cbcd00c4dce30b5aa48eebeccd3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNTePe4f2JpsPjYLXoqoLQiC6DlMktkajRtJUqX_3qUWwdMM7_A-c3iq6pKSJe9o310lLDEvv3i_7BUT4qSa0V6ppiWcnk676PqGdq08rxY5e0MIa1tFJJtV69UIYZ99ruNQf8QSUx0Q0ujHbV0gv9d-rO2rDy7hWH_78joFBUNAW3YQauczGB982V9UZwOEjIvjnFcvd7fPN-vm4fF-c7N6aCyjojTMSU473jppLHcgBONcOcuGXrVsUAYU662xjpDpbJERIwC4QjRorWOGzavNL9dFeNOfyX9A2usIXh-CmLYaUvE2oJaGMI4dZ8wh5xJBIhWildMjq4yRE-v6yPIQRiz_ccdsN_rk4xtozHr19EwIoZJITsRUJ791m2LOCYe_PiX64EUfvOjJiz54YT_je4SC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability</title><source>Dialnet</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge ; Alane Silva, Érica ; Silva Guedes, Marília</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge ; Alane Silva, Érica ; Silva Guedes, Marília</creatorcontrib><description>Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) present cognitive deficits interfering with the motor learning process. Objective: To analyze the motor learning of children with intellectual disability (ID) and compare with typically developing children. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 children of both genders (10 with ID and aged 8.5±1.57 years). The experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups were composed of children with and without ID, respectively. We used a maze task printed on a paper sheet (A4 size). Ten attempts were performed on the first day: five for the acquisition 1 (A1) and five for the acquisition 2 (A2) phase. Five attempts were also performed 48 hours later for the retention phase (RET). Results: The results related to the motor learning phases were lower in the EG compared with CG (p < 0.01). Within-group comparisons showed no significant differences between the outcomes. Children in the EG maintained the score in the A1 and A2 phases and declined in the RET phase, while the CG maintained the same scores over the three phases. Conclusion: Children with ID presented lower performance in the maze task than typically developing children. It seems that motor learning is slower in individuals with ID than controls, and they need more time and repetitions to learn the maze task.
Key words: Child development, Intellectual disability, Motor activity, Learning, Motor task</description><identifier>ISSN: 1579-1726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1988-2041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1988-2041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47197/retos.v49.98355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>FEADEF</publisher><subject>Child development ; Intellectual disability ; Learning ; Motor activity ; Motor task</subject><ispartof>Retos (Madrid), 2023-01, Vol.49 (49), p.807-812</ispartof><rights>LICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,871,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alane Silva, Érica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva Guedes, Marília</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability</title><title>Retos (Madrid)</title><description>Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) present cognitive deficits interfering with the motor learning process. Objective: To analyze the motor learning of children with intellectual disability (ID) and compare with typically developing children. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 children of both genders (10 with ID and aged 8.5±1.57 years). The experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups were composed of children with and without ID, respectively. We used a maze task printed on a paper sheet (A4 size). Ten attempts were performed on the first day: five for the acquisition 1 (A1) and five for the acquisition 2 (A2) phase. Five attempts were also performed 48 hours later for the retention phase (RET). Results: The results related to the motor learning phases were lower in the EG compared with CG (p < 0.01). Within-group comparisons showed no significant differences between the outcomes. Children in the EG maintained the score in the A1 and A2 phases and declined in the RET phase, while the CG maintained the same scores over the three phases. Conclusion: Children with ID presented lower performance in the maze task than typically developing children. It seems that motor learning is slower in individuals with ID than controls, and they need more time and repetitions to learn the maze task.
Key words: Child development, Intellectual disability, Motor activity, Learning, Motor task</description><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Intellectual disability</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Motor activity</subject><subject>Motor task</subject><issn>1579-1726</issn><issn>1988-2041</issn><issn>1988-2041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FKZ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNTePe4f2JpsPjYLXoqoLQiC6DlMktkajRtJUqX_3qUWwdMM7_A-c3iq6pKSJe9o310lLDEvv3i_7BUT4qSa0V6ppiWcnk676PqGdq08rxY5e0MIa1tFJJtV69UIYZ99ruNQf8QSUx0Q0ujHbV0gv9d-rO2rDy7hWH_78joFBUNAW3YQauczGB982V9UZwOEjIvjnFcvd7fPN-vm4fF-c7N6aCyjojTMSU473jppLHcgBONcOcuGXrVsUAYU662xjpDpbJERIwC4QjRorWOGzavNL9dFeNOfyX9A2usIXh-CmLYaUvE2oJaGMI4dZ8wh5xJBIhWildMjq4yRE-v6yPIQRiz_ccdsN_rk4xtozHr19EwIoZJITsRUJ791m2LOCYe_PiX64EUfvOjJiz54YT_je4SC</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge</creator><creator>Alane Silva, Érica</creator><creator>Silva Guedes, Marília</creator><general>FEADEF</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AGMXS</scope><scope>FKZ</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability</title><author>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge ; Alane Silva, Érica ; Silva Guedes, Marília</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-3d641742d6bc4da553448dc3f9823f8ba839cbcd00c4dce30b5aa48eebeccd3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Intellectual disability</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Motor activity</topic><topic>Motor task</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alane Silva, Érica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva Guedes, Marília</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Dialnet (Open Access Full Text)</collection><collection>Dialnet</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Retos (Madrid)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jorge</au><au>Alane Silva, Érica</au><au>Silva Guedes, Marília</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability</atitle><jtitle>Retos (Madrid)</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>49</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>812</epage><pages>807-812</pages><issn>1579-1726</issn><issn>1988-2041</issn><eissn>1988-2041</eissn><abstract>Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) present cognitive deficits interfering with the motor learning process. Objective: To analyze the motor learning of children with intellectual disability (ID) and compare with typically developing children. Methods: The sample was composed of 20 children of both genders (10 with ID and aged 8.5±1.57 years). The experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups were composed of children with and without ID, respectively. We used a maze task printed on a paper sheet (A4 size). Ten attempts were performed on the first day: five for the acquisition 1 (A1) and five for the acquisition 2 (A2) phase. Five attempts were also performed 48 hours later for the retention phase (RET). Results: The results related to the motor learning phases were lower in the EG compared with CG (p < 0.01). Within-group comparisons showed no significant differences between the outcomes. Children in the EG maintained the score in the A1 and A2 phases and declined in the RET phase, while the CG maintained the same scores over the three phases. Conclusion: Children with ID presented lower performance in the maze task than typically developing children. It seems that motor learning is slower in individuals with ID than controls, and they need more time and repetitions to learn the maze task.
Key words: Child development, Intellectual disability, Motor activity, Learning, Motor task</abstract><pub>FEADEF</pub><doi>10.47197/retos.v49.98355</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1579-1726 |
ispartof | Retos (Madrid), 2023-01, Vol.49 (49), p.807-812 |
issn | 1579-1726 1988-2041 1988-2041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dialnet_primary_oai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001606405 |
source | Dialnet; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Child development Intellectual disability Learning Motor activity Motor task |
title | Analysis of motor learning task in children with intellectual disability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A52%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dialnet_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20motor%20learning%20task%20in%20children%20with%20intellectual%20disability&rft.jtitle=Retos%20(Madrid)&rft.au=Lopes%20Cavalcante%20Neto,%20Jorge&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=49&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=812&rft.pages=807-812&rft.issn=1579-1726&rft.eissn=1988-2041&rft_id=info:doi/10.47197/retos.v49.98355&rft_dat=%3Cdialnet_doaj_%3Eoai_dialnet_unirioja_es_ART0001606405%3C/dialnet_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6b034e7433de446ea6e1552623fc8bb6&rfr_iscdi=true |